Tuning For tuning and related discussions

How lean is Safe???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 07:26 PM
  #1  
Lithium's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
How lean is Safe???

Now I don't want a bunch of B.S. in this thread, so leave out anything having to do with 42# injectors and 2.7" pulley. Right now I'm tuned at 12.1 and have no detonation at all. Reading 0* knock all thru. My tuner say the car wants to run closer to 13.1. He says that the GM stage 2 tune is set at 13.1. Is it safe?????

Right now I'm running intake, 2.7" pulley, 42# injectors and 1 step colder plugs. Keep in mind I'm at 5600' here in Albuquerque.

Third gear pull netted me 257hp/236tq.


My tuner thinks that 13.1 will net me closer to 280hp/240tq.

Stock tune I ran 217hp/189tq and I was at nearly 14.1 then it dropped to 12.5.1
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 07:30 PM
  #2  
BooSSted's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-07-05
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 0
From: Bantario
Personally, I don't think I would want my car over 12.5:1. Running leaner will increase your HP numbers, but it comes with risks. If your car is running well now and your happy, you should just leave it the way it is!
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #3  
zinner's Avatar
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: 08-26-04
Posts: 4,944
Likes: 2
From: RTP, NC
I shoot for 12.5 to 1.



You think you are going to get that much power from leaning it out 1 afr pt.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 07:40 PM
  #4  
Lithium's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
Originally Posted by zinner
I shoot for 12.5 to 1.



You think you are going to get that much power from leaning it out 1 afr pt.

It went from 217 down to 205 when he took the stock tune from12.5.1 down to 11.8.1
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 07:43 PM
  #5  
Shortbus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-25-06
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by zinner
I shoot for 12.5 to 1.



You think you are going to get that much power from leaning it out 1 afr pt.

Exactly your risking so much for so little, and the 2.7 with 42#'s It would be in you, and your cars best intrest to upgrade.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 07:45 PM
  #6  
zinner's Avatar
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: 08-26-04
Posts: 4,944
Likes: 2
From: RTP, NC
Here is the issue I see, you are giving up a margine of safety for performance. That might be fine, but you then your car isn't a daily driver anymore.

Just watch out for knock
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 07:50 PM
  #7  
Lithium's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
Originally Posted by Shortbus
Exactly your risking so much for so little, and the 2.7 with 42#'s It would be in you, and your cars best intrest to upgrade.

Once agian I said I didn't want to here the old 2.7/2.8 and 42# injectors bullshit!

If you must here are my numbers.
Currentyl 12.1 A/F and only 81% duty cycle. Its 42* here and atmosphereic pressure puts us at about 3600' instead of the actual of 5600'. I will post up graphs and all that jazz later.
So STFU about the 2.7/2.8 and 42# injectors already, they are more than enough for me and my current setup.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 07:58 PM
  #8  
Ljavy17's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-05
Posts: 3,622
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Originally Posted by Lithium
It went from 217 down to 205 when he took the stock tune from12.5.1 down to 11.8.1
I donnu I should believe that man, sounds too much, I mean that and you cant gain 20whp from going 1.0 AFR leaner, thats just insane. Too much power, I mean thats what people get with Water INjection.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 08:01 PM
  #9  
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 7,570
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
I don't have a wide band, but I like to keep mine in the low 12s, like 12.2 - 12.5 any leaner your just waiting to burn a piston.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 08:08 PM
  #10  
Lithium's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
Originally Posted by Ljavy17
I donnu I should believe that man, sounds too much, I mean that and you cant gain 20whp from going 1.0 AFR leaner, thats just insane. Too much power, I mean thats what people get with Water INjection.

Thats not 20 thats 12, and I didn't say this, my tuner did..... I do know a little about the laws of combustion though, and too wet (i.e. too much fuel) effects combustion much more than too much air (I mean they both hinder the process, but it takes much more air to start to hinder combustion of any solvent than it does fuel in the same settings)..... just a thought.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 08:10 PM
  #11  
CTORANGESC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-22-06
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
13.1 A/F ratio is perfectly fine to run. Just try and monitor the knock. In now way is 13.1 lean. Anything above 14.7 is going to be considered lean. 12.5 in just a mark that has been set to be perfectly safe when doing high performance mods. Also anything under 12.5 is not good. Eventhough people may think it is better, if you go below this, lets say in the 11's then you run the risk of wasing the cylinders with gas. Thats not good for the motor. I have done many dyno runs on many diff vehicles (v8, v6, 4, turbo, supercharged whatever. Most of the airfuel ratios were right at 13.1. So I have to say 13.1 is fine just try and keep an eye on the knock.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 08:13 PM
  #12  
Shortbus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-25-06
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Lithium
Once agian I said I didn't want to here the old 2.7/2.8 and 42# injectors bullshit!

If you must here are my numbers.
Currentyl 12.1 A/F and only 81% duty cycle. Its 42* here and atmosphereic pressure puts us at about 3600' instead of the actual of 5600'. I will post up graphs and all that jazz later.
So STFU about the 2.7/2.8 and 42# injectors already, they are more than enough for me and my current setup.

Ok, its your car. No need to get your panites in a bunch, but hey you know it all so.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 08:16 PM
  #13  
Lithium's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
Oh, I forgot to mention, I also went with a step colder plugs....
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 08:17 PM
  #14  
Shortbus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-25-06
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Lithium
Oh, I forgot to mention, I also went with a step colder plugs....

Right now I'm running intake, 2.7" pulley, 42# injectors and 1 step colder plugs. Keep in mind I'm at 5600' here in Albuquerque.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 08:22 PM
  #15  
Lithium's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
Originally Posted by Shortbus
Right now I'm running intake, 2.7" pulley, 42# injectors and 1 step colder plugs. Keep in mind I'm at 5600' here in Albuquerque.

Oops!!!
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 08:35 PM
  #16  
Lithium's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
Originally Posted by Jim@Tagracecraft
Wow you guys really like it on the lean side
We always tune our cars to 11.5 a/f for turbo and 11.8-12a/f for the supercharged cars including the cobalts
Going to 13 a/f is plain Crazy I think you should find another tuner Unless you want new pistons and or a head gasket
We tune all motor Cars to 13.1-2 at the most

Coming from a turbo car, 11.2-11.5 is what I am used to, thats why this thread was made in the first place. I was absolutely amazed when he pulled up the GM stage 2 tune and it showed 13.1.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #17  
Shortbus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-25-06
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Jim@Tagracecraft
Wow you guys really like it on the lean side
We always tune our cars to 11.5 a/f for turbo and 11.8-12a/f for the supercharged cars including the cobalts
Going to 13 a/f is plain Crazy I think you should find another tuner Unless you want new pistons and or a head gasket
We tune all motor Cars to 13.1-2 at the most

Dont bother explaining, no one wants to listen until they break something.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 08:54 PM
  #18  
Lithium's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
Alright, new numbers for the night.

265hp/236tq thats just from adjusting the A/F from 12.1 to 12.5.1.


Tuning resumes in the morning.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 10:17 PM
  #19  
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 7,570
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
I asked Rob, and he said for a daily driver tune a good AFR would be 12.2-12.5 and for the track 12.8-13.0
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 07:14 AM
  #20  
DWK5150's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-04-06
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
I shoot personally for 12:1 and at the track go a bit leaner.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #21  
Matty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-27-06
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
From: eh
Mine is set at 11.8 at 7K.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 11:48 AM
  #22  
distillion's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-11-05
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 1
From: mississauga
20-21* timing.
11.5 AFR
car runs mint.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 03:50 PM
  #23  
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
I'd say 11.5-12 max. This is a boosted car, not N/A where a 13:1 would be great. A little bit more fuel will save the car from going to lean and boom. Just my thoughts from seeing tunes on other boosted car forums and discussions amongst the local tuners.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 03:55 PM
  #24  
Darksun's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-04-05
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
From: LongIsland
Originally Posted by CTORANGESC
13.1 A/F ratio is perfectly fine to run. Just try and monitor the knock. In now way is 13.1 lean. Anything above 14.7 is going to be considered lean. 12.5 in just a mark that has been set to be perfectly safe when doing high performance mods. Also anything under 12.5 is not good. Eventhough people may think it is better, if you go below this, lets say in the 11's then you run the risk of wasing the cylinders with gas. Thats not good for the motor. I have done many dyno runs on many diff vehicles (v8, v6, 4, turbo, supercharged whatever. Most of the airfuel ratios were right at 13.1. So I have to say 13.1 is fine just try and keep an eye on the knock.
hahaha i hope people take what you say with a grain of salt. I dabbled in in the 12.8 from 5800 on till 6450's and it took some time and car ran hard but the motor finally started to fall apart from constantly running it at that a/f. If the injector can give enough fuel to leave you in the low 12's high 11's i would suggest the person stay in that range. my cars at 12.3 right now i doubt i'll go any leaner ever again. 12.3 put me at 243WHP back in the day and 12.8 put me at 250whp. 7extra whp wasn't worth my motor.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 09:07 AM
  #25  
InfinityzeN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
From: Harker Heights, TX
Ummmm... first off, the GM Stage 2 is tuned for around 11.8 at WOT IIR. If there is 13.1 in there somewhere, I'm betting it is for crusing. For F/I engines you want more fuel. 13a/f ratios are only good for N/A engines. If you try running a S/C... or even worse a T/C car at that ratio as a daily driver you are going to blow it up bad.

12~12.5 is what I would look at with a S/C setup. Closer to 12 if you don't have any cooling mods, closer to 12.5 if you have a high performance heat exchanger/water injection/etc.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 AM.