06 SS/SC vs RSX-S
Originally Posted by phxSS
It would be intersting to drive a V8 Honda. Speaking of high rpm's, the '96-'98 cobra's can rev to 7,000 rpm all day long, which is pretty impressive for a V8.
The way I see it, is you can brag all day how high your engine can rev..I'm still going to laugh when I beat you.
The way I see it, is you can brag all day how high your engine can rev..I'm still going to laugh when I beat you.
Originally Posted by Chevypowered
I am wondering if some of you guys know how HP is tested. It is figured out from TORQUE x A Constant x RPMS. So the more Torque you have early on the more HP you have. That is why VTEC engines create max HP and TQ at almost Redline.
As for the comment about a RSX-S running 11s with 270whp I can highly doubt that. I know of a few guys with 300 whp/290 ft-lbs in a GTI running 11.8- 12.0 with a semi-gutted car. Some guys need to think before they start throwing numbers. My brother has a VW 1.8t putting down around 215 whp/250 wft-lbs and pulls a lot harder bottom end vs. my SS but doesn't have enough top end to keep up.
I am not sure why the comment was made that GM had to put the Supercharger on there to get 100 hp/liter. Hell there are V8s that don't put down 50hp/liter. And not everyone wants a engine that takes till redline to create any reasonable about of power and still have half any normal engines torque. If you want to talk trash about higher reving why don't you talk about the Street bikes that rev to 13k-15k and still create more power than a honda engine all over the board.
As for the comment about a RSX-S running 11s with 270whp I can highly doubt that. I know of a few guys with 300 whp/290 ft-lbs in a GTI running 11.8- 12.0 with a semi-gutted car. Some guys need to think before they start throwing numbers. My brother has a VW 1.8t putting down around 215 whp/250 wft-lbs and pulls a lot harder bottom end vs. my SS but doesn't have enough top end to keep up.
I am not sure why the comment was made that GM had to put the Supercharger on there to get 100 hp/liter. Hell there are V8s that don't put down 50hp/liter. And not everyone wants a engine that takes till redline to create any reasonable about of power and still have half any normal engines torque. If you want to talk trash about higher reving why don't you talk about the Street bikes that rev to 13k-15k and still create more power than a honda engine all over the board.
alright now think of a 600cc 4 wheeler that might have 1 huge cyliner...sohc with one carb....and a rather restrictive quiet stock exhaust...it wouldnt even come close to the hp that the gixxer makes...
Originally Posted by FastFrontier17
can you tell me the difference between a cobra's v8 compared to a GT ??? doesnt the cobra have a ohc
....
Lots of people consider Fords move to OHC one of their worst, the LSX motors are widely considered better ... infact unless you are looking for smothness fords OHC motors fall short of the pushrod LS serries
Originally Posted by FastFrontier17
can you tell me the difference between a cobra's v8 compared to a GT ??? doesnt the cobra have a ohc
....
96-04 GT: 2 valve/cylinder SOHC 4.6
05-06 GT: 3 valve/cylinder SOHC 4.6
96-99,01,03-04 Cobra: 4 valve/cylinder DOHC 4.6
Originally Posted by 03EBZ06
Yup, all the cars you've mentioned lack torque.
Don't care if you could take it up to 20,000 rpm, your car is still slow.
Don't care if you could take it up to 20,000 rpm, your car is still slow.
Originally Posted by Darksun280
I don't know how many times I gotta explain to people on this forum that short gearing is a torque multiplier. Most Honda's come with some crazy ass gearing to make up for the lack of actuall Tq the motors make. Honda thought out what they where doing. Its not like they designed these motor and where like "Damn it Jim we for got to put torque in our motors. They'll never be fast and can never win races".
Originally Posted by Darksun280
Um.....You Were getting walked if we go by your exsample. Just cause the raced ended at that point and he was only a car and a half ahead doesn't mean you weren't getting walked. See since he traped higher than you at that point that means he was going faster than you right? So If he was going faster than you that means he was pulling away. The longer the race went It might have gottend worse. No guarentee that you woulda came back by 140 mph. If you weren't getting walked he would have been a car and a half ahead of you and you would traped almost the same. him doing almost 2mph more than you translates to you got walked.
Originally Posted by SS4ME
Wow, I did not realize that 2 mph made such a huge difference! Right!! 
Originally Posted by xonic
it wouldn't be a fast walk but it's possible, FastF let me guess the mods... I/RH/E (maybe an IMG and motor mounts)?
Originally Posted by FastFrontier17
stock tires... rh/cai/e
Originally Posted by FastFrontier17
ok wow...what if i said you car is slow compared to the other cars in my family garage...does that make you sad? 
Originally Posted by 03EBZ06
Go ahead and make up list of cars you don't have. Although my car isn't all that fast, your car is still painfully slow.
Originally Posted by FastFrontier17
no im not going to be childish and tell you that the slowest of the cars in the garage is faster than yours...oops guess i just did... 
a guy whos garage is full of cars faster than a z06 must have a digital cam and you obviously have some spare time so I expect these up in about 10-15 mins ...starting now
Originally Posted by FastFrontier17
short gearing? 40 + in first...60+ in second....sounds normal to me for a 4 banger with a 6-speed...
Originally Posted by c7015
saying what **** you has doesnt prove **** ..people are going to suspect you of lying so save us all the trouble walk out to the garage and take a picture with you and the cars that says **** you c7015
a guy whos garage is full of cars faster than a z06 must have a digital cam and you obviously have some spare time so I expect these up in about 10-15 mins ...starting now
a guy whos garage is full of cars faster than a z06 must have a digital cam and you obviously have some spare time so I expect these up in about 10-15 mins ...starting now
i've got a few vids and it looks like they can go 40+ in first and around 65ish in 2nd.
Edit: Actually it looks like 1st tops out at 40. But the vid I'm watchin the car has it's redline raised a few hundred rpms.
Edit: Actually it looks like 1st tops out at 40. But the vid I'm watchin the car has it's redline raised a few hundred rpms.
Originally Posted by FastFrontier17
no im not going to be childish and tell you that the slowest of the cars in the garage is faster than yours...oops guess i just did... 
Originally Posted by 03EBZ06
Likely story. Hey it's not my car but is faster than yours, what a tool.


