War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

got SSmoked by a Mazda 3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 08:51 PM
  #1  
TorontoSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-14-07
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
got SSmoked by a Mazda 3

As the title goes, it was not a even a competiton. Gotta post up the bruises as well right not only the trophies...lol...well here it goes. First race ever in this car

His car looked very stock, until...well until he passed me, that thing was loooooooooooooud. Manual of course, I heard his shift points well from my car with my windows up. Had some kinda aftermarket exhaust well hidden, prolly intake as well. Cuz it was loud. Anyways I gave up after he had 2 cars on me and pulling away.

I know i have only had this car for a weak, but i have put almost 1200km on it, cuz i drive waay too much. And in couple of months im going away, which means the car will be collecting dust in my garage. Prolly gonna stow her away after the first oil change.

But yeah word to those considering a 2.4, GET THE MANUAL. The Automagic is slow..lol
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 08:58 PM
  #2  
chevysalesman614's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-03-06
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 09:01 PM
  #3  
MachiBLue's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-20-05
Posts: 3,402
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Nice...it's always good to post some deaths..and yes Auto's FTL
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 09:04 PM
  #4  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
he musta had something, i don't even see a mazda 3 as a threat.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 09:05 PM
  #5  
TorontoSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-14-07
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by chevysalesman614
I know my car is teh slow

im contemplating getting custom license plates "So Slow" or "Supa Slo" or "BRICK"
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 09:11 PM
  #6  
syP's Avatar
syP
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-24-07
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
From: Wheaton, Illinois
how about slobalt?
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 09:14 PM
  #7  
TorontoSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-14-07
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by syP
how about slobalt?
mmm

Seems to common, prolly taken if not, im all over that
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 09:18 PM
  #8  
madmark's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: FT Knox KY
how do you lose to a mazda 3, my friends prelude is faster than a 3
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 09:28 PM
  #9  
Jimmys2007CobaltSS/C's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-30-07
Posts: 7,835
Likes: 1
From: Philadelphia, Pa
mazda 3 r slow the prelude will kill them and the ss/na....i use to have a prelude and they r really quick....my buddie has one to and he was riding my ASS 2day and i was flooring it and then led off at 60 somethinkg
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 09:32 PM
  #10  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
maybe it was a mazdaspeed 3?
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #11  
TorontoSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-14-07
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
maybe it was a mazdaspeed 3?
it most definetly was not. My cousing has a mazdaspeed 3, this one was prolly modded mazda 3 GT.

visual and audible mods, led me to the conclusion that he definetly had an intake and exhaust mod, also he was 5spd.

Mine is an automagic 2.4 n/a, although i keep feeding it 91 octane, i think i need a few mods and tune
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #12  
madmark's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: FT Knox KY
and i hope a mazda speed 3 will beat a ss/na by more than 2 cars
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 12:05 AM
  #13  
Quicksilver83's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-22-06
Posts: 4,511
Likes: 1
From: Grand Prairie, Texas
my brother has a mazda 3, he doesn't even try bother comparing his car to mine. I wish a mazda 3 would try to race me i'd love to break his little heart, lol. I'm a bastard i know i know!
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 12:12 AM
  #14  
N8s07SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-19-06
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by madmark
and i hope a mazda speed 3 will beat a ss/na by more than 2 cars
He didn't say at what speed he let off. Maybe it was only 60 mph, and by then the Mazda already had 2 cars on him. He says it wasn't a MS3, but there isn't much difference, unless he knows the guy. Don't the regular 3s only have like 150 crank hp/tq? I thought the 2.4 SS had 170 hp / 160 tq. I don't know much about either car though, so it's possible that one or the other may be underrated.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 12:14 AM
  #15  
cougar2588's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-01-07
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
2.2 cobalt ls: 145 hp 155 lb-ft torque.
2.3 mazda 3: 156 hp 150 lb-ft torque.

stock for stock, that is a drivers race. but dont be ashamed u lost cuz no doubt about it, the mazda u ran into, HAD to have been heavily modded to even keep up with the ss/na
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 12:19 AM
  #16  
nitrous818's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-11-07
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: california
ive raced a mazdapeed and i lost by four cars.[ im auto] i would tear up a mazda 3. my friend has one no hp/tq at all
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 04:51 AM
  #17  
ICEMAN187's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-31-07
Posts: 3,818
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster, California
Ok the 2.4 SS is rated at 173 hp at the crank. With my mods I have got to be pushing 200 hp at the crank. I raced a Mazda 3 last month and beat it by 4 and a half cars when I hit 95mph! It was stock of course, but still those cars are weaksauce foesure! The car you raced must have been heavily modded, and I have an auto too and I still smashed one.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 04:53 AM
  #18  
tREBs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-16-06
Posts: 6,540
Likes: 0
From: World
ahaha nice death!
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 05:15 AM
  #19  
Punkloser6's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 01-17-06
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Originally Posted by TorontoSS
As the title goes, it was not a even a competiton. Gotta post up the bruises as well right not only the trophies...lol...well here it goes. First race ever in this car

His car looked very stock, until...well until he passed me, that thing was loooooooooooooud. Manual of course, I heard his shift points well from my car with my windows up. Had some kinda aftermarket exhaust well hidden, prolly intake as well. Cuz it was loud. Anyways I gave up after he had 2 cars on me and pulling away.

I know i have only had this car for a weak, but i have put almost 1200km on it, cuz i drive waay too much. And in couple of months im going away, which means the car will be collecting dust in my garage. Prolly gonna stow her away after the first oil change.

But yeah word to those considering a 2.4, GET THE MANUAL. The Automagic is slow..lol
automatics r crappy. real men,(and women) drive manual. personally i dont like that much drivetrain loss due to those CRAPPY ass clutches in automatics. clutchpacks can goto hell haha. autos r MAYBE for cadillacs for old ppl who cant move much. otherwise i think ALL cars should be manuals. =D crap why spend the extra 1500$ for a auto when manuals cheaper anywayz
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 06:22 AM
  #20  
ICEMAN187's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-31-07
Posts: 3,818
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster, California
Originally Posted by Punkloser6
automatics r crappy. real men,(and women) drive manual. personally i dont like that much drivetrain loss due to those CRAPPY ass clutches in automatics. clutchpacks can goto hell haha. autos r MAYBE for cadillacs for old ppl who cant move much. otherwise i think ALL cars should be manuals. =D crap why spend the extra 1500$ for a auto when manuals cheaper anywayz
The manual 2.4 SS is only rated about 1-3hp more than the 2.4 SS auto. I have the auto and I have smashed plenty of cars. Think before you post bro, just a suggestion! Believe it or not there are auto cars that could beat your car, some food for thought! Im out peace!
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #21  
BooSSted's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-07-05
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 0
From: Bantario
Originally Posted by ICEMAN187
The manual 2.4 SS is only rated about 1-3hp more than the 2.4 SS auto. I have the auto and I have smashed plenty of cars. Think before you post bro, just a suggestion! Believe it or not there are auto cars that could beat your car, some food for thought! Im out peace!
Manuals don't make more HP than Automatics, haha. The gear ratios being shorter in the 5sp and the painfully slow shift of the automatics is what makes the difference.

Originally Posted by Punkloser6
automatics r crappy. real men,(and women) drive manual. personally i dont like that much drivetrain loss due to those CRAPPY ass clutches in automatics. clutchpacks can goto hell haha. autos r MAYBE for cadillacs for old ppl who cant move much. otherwise i think ALL cars should be manuals. =D crap why spend the extra 1500$ for a auto when manuals cheaper anywayz
Because daily driving in a busy City is a nightmare with a Manual transmission.

I think your outlook is a little narrow minded and really doesn't make a hell of a lot of sense, haha. Based on your style of typing, I would say your 18yrs old at most, you'll grow up soon and realize there is more to life than manual transmissions

Last edited by BooSSted; Jun 25, 2007 at 10:41 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 10:46 AM
  #22  
JRelly's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-27-06
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville,Florida
Originally Posted by BooSSted
Manuals don't make more HP than Automatics, haha. The gear ratios being shorter in the 5sp and the painfully slow shift of the automatics is what makes the difference.



Because daily driving in a busy City is a nightmare with a Manual transmission.

I think your outlook is a little narrow minded and really doesn't make a hell of a lot of sense, haha. Based on your style of typing, I would say your 18yrs old at most, you'll grow up soon and realize there is more to life than manual transmissions
Actually Automatics are attributed to power loss depending on the car it can be upwards of 25% loss. But the shift points in an auto are death in races.

Originally Posted by Punkloser6
automatics r crappy. real men,(and women) drive manual. personally i dont like that much drivetrain loss due to those CRAPPY ass clutches in automatics. clutchpacks can goto hell haha. autos r MAYBE for cadillacs for old ppl who cant move much. otherwise i think ALL cars should be manuals. =D crap why spend the extra 1500$ for a auto when manuals cheaper anywayz
Automatics are more practical for everyday use....enough said

Last edited by JRelly; Jun 25, 2007 at 10:46 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 10:49 AM
  #23  
blown06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-06
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Central IL
i use to have a mazda 3 with catback 4-2-1 long tube header air intake, and catback I loved the car i wouldnt dawg on them to much slap a turbo on and you have a potential beast..... www.hiboost.com
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 10:53 AM
  #24  
JRelly's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-27-06
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville,Florida
Originally Posted by blown06
i use to have a mazda 3 with catback 4-2-1 long tube header air intake, and catback I loved the car i wouldnt dawg on them to much slap a turbo on and you have a potential beast..... www.hiboost.com
I agree if done right any car can be quick its just a matter of proper planning and good money management
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 03:58 PM
  #25  
CynicX's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-11-06
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally Posted by Punkloser6
automatics r crappy. real men,(and women) drive manual. personally i dont like that much drivetrain loss due to those CRAPPY ass clutches in automatics. clutchpacks can goto hell haha. autos r MAYBE for cadillacs for old ppl who cant move much. otherwise i think ALL cars should be manuals. =D crap why spend the extra 1500$ for a auto when manuals cheaper anywayz
You dont know much about automatics.

Most nowaday get better MPG. The are more convinent in heavy traffic. Its easier to multitask if you do business from your car IE cell phone etc. You can drive a automatic without the use of BOTH hands and BOTH legs, hurt one leg or one arm and driving an manual can be near impossible.

And to top if off a modded automatic transmission is the best way to go in many competitive sports. Such has 4x4 rock climbing. Also a modded automatic transmission (valve body, shift kit, torque converter, etc) will out shift even the best manual driver with shifting speeds that are measured in milliseconds. Add launching controls and it will constantly out launch the best manual driver too. Plus a properly setup automatic is generally stronger then a manual transmission.

You should really broaden your outlook on automatics. Then try to educate yourself.

Do you think these glorified automatics (ie tiptronic, paddle shifting, dsg) are dumb? Because they are superior to manual transmission in everyway. Automatic CVT transmission such as the one found in the new Altima dont even shift its one really really long gear from 0-120+ MPH that keep the car at its peak power, try to race that.

I own a 5 speed w/ PPG straight cut 1-2 helical cut 3-4 stock 5th w/ synchrod shifting. IE I'm a manual fan. But understand the benefits of an automatic...
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 AM.