My 2.2 vs 95 eclipse GST
12-03-2008, 04:55 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 08-18-07
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My 2.2 vs 95 eclipse GST
what do you all think my chances are....he is running stock boost and has intake and exhaust my mods and best time are in my sig...i run very consistant. plz share thoughts
12-03-2008, 05:42 PM
#2
Junior Member
Join Date: 11-27-06
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He'll probably take you. They are pretty heavy and slow for a turbo car but when modded they can be beast. Maybe if he's auto or cant' shift to well you could edge him out.
12-03-2008, 05:46 PM
#3
Senior Member
hard to say. 95% of old turbo eclipses have leaking rings, worn out turbos, slipping clutches, half plugged injectors and shot ignitions... you may be able to shock him
12-03-2008, 05:51 PM
#6
Senior Member
in fact, these were motor trends numbers in 1995
1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS-T (Auto) 7.4 15.5 (MT June, 94)
and for a GSX of the same year, a 14.9. neither of those times would scare me too too much.
1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS-T (Auto) 7.4 15.5 (MT June, 94)
and for a GSX of the same year, a 14.9. neither of those times would scare me too too much.
12-03-2008, 05:59 PM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-20-08
Location: .
Posts: 6,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can't go by this site
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
A 98 Camaro Z28 runs a 13.7??
12-03-2008, 06:02 PM
#10
Senior Member
that site lists the same times that i just posted.
my biggest point is that DSMs don't exactly hold up well as-is, and a 95 is almost 14 years old... it's probably well beyond it's prime.
my biggest point is that DSMs don't exactly hold up well as-is, and a 95 is almost 14 years old... it's probably well beyond it's prime.
12-03-2008, 06:15 PM
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 08-18-07
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its listings on dragtimes.com arent that impressive either...and thats usually with good drivers
Last edited by jbenso4; 12-03-2008 at 06:15 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
12-03-2008, 07:43 PM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-20-08
Location: .
Posts: 6,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Found this link
Baseline dyno
166.8 HP 177.8 TQ
Injen Intake
184.9 HP 196.6 TQ
Exhaust
194.5 HP 203.7 TQ
Downpipe
202 HP 206.6 TQ
http://www.importtuner.com/powerpage...s_t/index.html
Easy power.
Baseline dyno
166.8 HP 177.8 TQ
Injen Intake
184.9 HP 196.6 TQ
Exhaust
194.5 HP 203.7 TQ
Downpipe
202 HP 206.6 TQ
http://www.importtuner.com/powerpage...s_t/index.html
Easy power.
Last edited by Perfect.disguise; 12-03-2008 at 07:43 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
12-04-2008, 09:03 PM
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-02-07
Location: Right here, Ohio
Posts: 7,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-04-2008, 09:05 PM
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 08-18-07
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
haha he has had it like 2 weeks...kid doesnt even have his liscense yet....was bragging over myspace and said he was cool cause it has a turbo...when he starts it it sounds like it is ging to die......he CANNOT drive to save his life...i will be first to admit that if it is driven by somebody who knows how to drive it will beat me..we will see...not to worried about it either way