War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

Raced a Mustang GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2009, 11:50 AM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
redcobaltss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-13-08
Location: san antonio
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Raced a Mustang GT

Just a quick vid vs a GT mustang. Cobalt mods-stage 2, 2.8, cai Mustang mods- H-pipe flows, cai, plenum, spacer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=banf0_85QSs
Old 01-09-2009, 11:51 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
D4u2s0t's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-18-05
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
you have to just post the link, not embed it.

http://www.youtube.com/v/banf0_85QSs&hl=en&fs=1
Old 01-09-2009, 11:54 AM
  #3  
New Member
 
sloancallaway's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-09-08
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ya mustang gt's have nothing even on the stock LSJ... i would know i own a 95 with the 5 liter no compitition Even the new ones are really no comp. if you know how to drive

if it was a stock mustang

Last edited by sloancallaway; 01-09-2009 at 11:54 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 01-09-2009, 11:55 AM
  #4  
Banned
 
D4u2s0t's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-18-05
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by sloancallaway
ya mustang gt's have nothing even on the stock LSJ... i would know i own a 95 with the 5 liter no compitition Even the new ones are really no comp. if you know how to drive

if it was a stock mustang
you're talking about a 13 year old car

the new ones are no comp for a stock ss/sc? do some more research.
Old 01-09-2009, 11:59 AM
  #5  
New Member
 
sloancallaway's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-09-08
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ya true mine is modded first and second i have raced 3 new ones and havent lost yet...

and the one in the video isn't even the new model

Last edited by sloancallaway; 01-09-2009 at 11:59 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 01-09-2009, 12:03 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice run!! That is to be expected since you're stage 2 and he drives an 03 GT. If it was an 05 or newer it would have been different.
Old 01-09-2009, 12:07 PM
  #7  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
redcobaltss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-13-08
Location: san antonio
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
Nice run!! That is to be expected since you're stage 2 and he drives an 03 GT. If it was an 05 or newer it would have been different.
i have raced new ones as well. Most of them i have taken. just because its not a newer sn97 style doesnt mean the older one is that much slower. they are lighter. i used to have a 03 GT with just bolt ons no gears and i would tear up newer ones with mods. i miss that GT

edit* also raced a mach 1 with a cat back about a week ago. Dont have vid but took him about 1 car up to 100 or so.
Old 01-09-2009, 12:11 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by redcobaltss
i have raced new ones as well. Most of them i have taken. just because its not a newer sn97 style doesnt mean the older one is that much slower. they are lighter. i used to have a 03 GT with just bolt ons no gears and i would tear up newer ones with mods.
I used to have an 01 GT with the same mods as my 05 GT, and the 01 never had a chance, EVER!!! Stock for stock with equal drivers, the 05+ GT's are a 1/2 second faster in the 1/4 mile, 13.5-13.6 compared to 14.1-14.2. And the fastest stock 99-04 GT has gone 13.7 and the fastest 05+ has gone 13.2, and has gone 12.8-12.9 with just an intake, tune and some DR's. Mach 1's on average are a tad bit faster than an 05+ GT. Race one from a dig instead of roll racing.
Old 01-09-2009, 12:28 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
TurdFerguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-24-08
Location: austin
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
race frum roll. i race frum roll.
Old 01-09-2009, 12:30 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Mike09SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-12-08
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 970
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good kill
Old 01-09-2009, 12:30 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Psykostevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,911
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
The mustang guy bought a Spacer LOL.
Old 01-09-2009, 12:31 PM
  #12  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
matego's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice Job I do not fear Mustangs at all. Sure there are some fast ones, but I rarely see them on the street. Heres a video of a 427r Roush vs. a St2 Cobalt I shot for my friend Brian at the track. Wasnt even a race. Sure Mustang guys are going to say its a shitty driver but his MPH sucked as well. If they are so bad ass why didnt he catch Brian in the back 1/2 ??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9maN9...e=channel_page
Old 01-09-2009, 12:32 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Psykostevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,911
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by matego
Nice Job I do not fear Mustangs at all. Sure there are some fast ones, but I rarely see them on the street. Heres a video of a 427r Roush vs. a St2 Cobalt I shoot for my friend Brian at the track. Wasnt even a race. Sure Mustang guys are going to say its a shitty driver but his MPH sucked as well. If they are so bad ass why didnt he catch Brian in the back 1/2 ??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9maN9...e=channel_page
The 427R makes a whopping 360rwhp/380rwtq. Hahahaha! Not all that mighty, but still faster than a GT.

I like my setup better.
Old 01-09-2009, 12:35 PM
  #14  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
redcobaltss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-13-08
Location: san antonio
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
I used to have an 01 GT with the same mods as my 05 GT, and the 01 never had a chance, EVER!!! Stock for stock with equal drivers, the 05+ GT's are a 1/2 second faster in the 1/4 mile, 13.5-13.6 compared to 14.1-14.2. And the fastest stock 99-04 GT has gone 13.7 and the fastest 05+ has gone 13.2, and has gone 12.8-12.9 with just an intake, tune and some DR's. Mach 1's on average are a tad bit faster than an 05+ GT. Race one from a dig instead of roll racing.
I have raced on from a dig. he got me by about 1 car to about 80ish. of course i had traction issues of course u would say raced from a dig. that's where a mustang shines and a cobalt doesn't. a low roll is much more suited for us so there's no arguing about traction. as for the newer and older GTs, anything can happen. This what i had on my gt- Plenum, flows, prochamber, timing adjuster, and k&n filter. my best times where 13.6 street tires, and 12.95 and dr's. no tune on the car. when i raced newer sn97's they mostly had mid pipes and cat backs, and full cai i would leave the about 1 to 1 1/2 cars. the ones with gears would take me just the same. Its all different on the streets then in magazines.
Old 01-09-2009, 03:17 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by redcobaltss
I have raced on from a dig. he got me by about 1 car to about 80ish. of course i had traction issues of course u would say raced from a dig. that's where a mustang shines and a cobalt doesn't. a low roll is much more suited for us so there's no arguing about traction. as for the newer and older GTs, anything can happen. This what i had on my gt- Plenum, flows, prochamber, timing adjuster, and k&n filter. my best times where 13.6 street tires, and 12.95 and dr's. no tune on the car. when i raced newer sn97's they mostly had mid pipes and cat backs, and full cai i would leave the about 1 to 1 1/2 cars. the ones with gears would take me just the same. Its all different on the streets then in magazines.
Sorry, but you're not gonna run a 13.6 with street tires and those mods and then slap on some DR's and knock off .7 seconds down to a 12.9, that is complete BS, not gonna happen.

Originally Posted by Psykostevo
The 427R makes a whopping 360rwhp/380rwtq. Hahahaha! Not all that mighty, but still faster than a GT.

I like my setup better.
I'm pretty sure with the right driver in a 427R it would put a serious hurtin on a GT, hell I would say it's safe to say it would beat an 03/04 Cobra.

Last edited by FutureEcotecOwner; 01-09-2009 at 03:17 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 01-09-2009, 03:55 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
06SS ALL DAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-01-08
Location: Philthydelphia, PA
Posts: 4,793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
stock or even 04 and below stang gt's with cat-backs and intake. i dont race i know for a fact i win by walking away. did it 4x already. waste of gas now
Old 01-09-2009, 04:09 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
04YellowGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-30-06
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by matego
Nice Job I do not fear Mustangs at all. Sure there are some fast ones, but I rarely see them on the street. Heres a video of a 427r Roush vs. a St2 Cobalt I shot for my friend Brian at the track. Wasnt even a race. Sure Mustang guys are going to say its a shitty driver but his MPH sucked as well. If they are so bad ass why didnt he catch Brian in the back 1/2 ??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9maN9...e=channel_page
Uhh the guy obviously couldn't drive. The car only ran 14.2, a bone stock 05 runs mid 13s.

Originally Posted by Psykostevo
The 427R makes a whopping 360rwhp/380rwtq. Hahahaha! Not all that mighty, but still faster than a GT.

I like my setup better.
They actually make 435hp/400tq but still a rip for the price.

Originally Posted by redcobaltss
I have raced on from a dig. he got me by about 1 car to about 80ish. of course i had traction issues of course u would say raced from a dig. that's where a mustang shines and a cobalt doesn't. a low roll is much more suited for us so there's no arguing about traction. as for the newer and older GTs, anything can happen. This what i had on my gt- Plenum, flows, prochamber, timing adjuster, and k&n filter. my best times where 13.6 street tires, and 12.95 and dr's. no tune on the car. when i raced newer sn97's they mostly had mid pipes and cat backs, and full cai i would leave the about 1 to 1 1/2 cars. the ones with gears would take me just the same. Its all different on the streets then in magazines.
Unless you had some serious weight reduction and slicks there is no way in hell you’re going to run 12.9 with those mods. The 13.6 is believable but the 12.9 is just not going to happen.
Old 01-09-2009, 04:34 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Psykostevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-06
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,911
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by 04YellowGT
They actually make 435hp/400tq but still a rip for the price.
Thanks for reading the brochure. I was talking about the RWHP as mentioned in my quote.
Old 01-09-2009, 04:39 PM
  #19  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
redcobaltss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-13-08
Location: san antonio
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 04YellowGT
Uhh the guy obviously couldn't drive. The car only ran 14.2, a bone stock 05 runs mid 13s.



They actually make 435hp/400tq but still a rip for the price.



Unless you had some serious weight reduction and slicks there is no way in hell you’re going to run 12.9 with those mods. The 13.6 is believable but the 12.9 is just not going to happen.
a little weight reduction i guess u can say. No spare tire, skinnies, no back seat and on DR's. many said my car was a freak. i would pull other cars that had twice the mods (gears, tune, pulleys, Full exhaust) it was ran at San Antonio Race way. It has been known to set some fast times.
Old 01-09-2009, 04:40 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
THRcobalt07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-13-08
Location: Palm Beach/Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mustangs suck plain and simple..unless its a Terminator or something. I as well raced a GT last night, either an 01 or 02 with exhaust, the video got messed up during filming somehow, but I won from a 40 by about a car to a car 1/2 and lost from a 30 by about a car cuz i decided to granny shift 3rd for some reason.
Old 01-09-2009, 04:55 PM
  #21  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
redcobaltss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-13-08
Location: san antonio
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
Sorry, but you're not gonna run a 13.6 with street tires and those mods and then slap on some DR's and knock off .7 seconds down to a 12.9, that is complete BS, not gonna happen.
well i did hit a 13.69 at 103 i think it was. It was a cold night. i ran about 10 times that night running constant 13.7-8s. its koo if you dont believe it. u weren't there. that was launching at about 1500-2000 rpm. had some tire spin most but not much. on the drags i would launch at about 4-4500 rpm and power shifted.
Old 01-09-2009, 04:57 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
cakeeater's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-07
Location: right behind you.
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by THRcobalt07
Mustangs suck plain and simple..unless its a Terminator or something. I as well raced a GT last night, either an 01 or 02 with exhaust, the video got messed up during filming somehow, but I won from a 40 by about a car to a car 1/2 and lost from a 30 by about a car cuz i decided to granny shift 3rd for some reason.
so a car that is 8 years old, had a base price about 1,000-2,000 more than your car, with just exhaust, sucks because it lost to you by a car and beat you in another race? damn. You have some high standards pal.
Old 01-09-2009, 05:08 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by redcobaltss
well i did hit a 13.69 at 103 i think it was. It was a cold night. i ran about 10 times that night running constant 13.7-8s. its koo if you dont believe it. u weren't there. that was launching at about 1500-2000 rpm. had some tire spin most but not much. on the drags i would launch at about 4-4500 rpm and power shifted.
I'm not saying you didnt run that 13.6 with your mods, I'm saying going from stock tires to DR's isnt going to drop your ET down to a 12.9.

Originally Posted by cakeeater
so a car that is 8 years old, had a base price about 1,000-2,000 more than your car, with just exhaust, sucks because it lost to you by a car and beat you in another race? damn. You have some high standards pal.
You can never win on here if you're trying to back the Mustang. And I'll even agree if it's the truth, but most the **** said about Mustangs on here isnt true.

Last edited by FutureEcotecOwner; 01-09-2009 at 05:08 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 01-09-2009, 05:24 PM
  #24  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
redcobaltss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-13-08
Location: san antonio
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
I'm not saying you didnt run that 13.6 with your mods, I'm saying going from stock tires to DR's isnt going to drop your ET down to a 12.9.
i u understand what ur saying. when i had the dr, i had the weight reduction i guess u could say. i wish i had the proof to show ya.
Old 01-09-2009, 05:31 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by redcobaltss
i u understand what ur saying. when i had the dr, i had the weight reduction i guess u could say. i wish i had the proof to show ya.
Yeah, maybe it can happen, but usually the best a 99-04 GT will run with full bolt ons, gears and DR's is in the 13.2-13.3 range. It usually takes atleast some cams and a nice tune to get into the 12's N/A.


Quick Reply: Raced a Mustang GT



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:41 PM.