i **** on one with a 100hp civic hatch before i got my motor swap. THEY ARE SLOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

 

You last two guys are funny.

A- You didn't beat a Mustang GT or LX 5.0 in a 100hp ricer

B- The fastest S-Series was the 1994-1995 S-10 SS, and they ran 15.8

 

i ran an 88 5.0 in my old car and walked all over it , i had an 89 ford probe gt, came stock 2.2 turbo running 14.6's, same motor the 89 SHO mustangs had basically except their turbos were a tad bigger.

if it is stock you should beat it, if you can drive

 

WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!

No such thing as an SHO Mustang. There's an SHO taurus but it used a 3.2l V6

No such thing as a Turbo 5.0 in 1988 from the factory. I think in 79 you could get a turbo 5.0....

The motor in the Turbo Mustang was a 2.3 SVO. Not a 2.2

No probe GT stock ran 14.6 ever.

 

Damn people and I get **** for stating a GTO is a 13.0 second car.

 

100whp in a 2100car WITH DRIVER.

cant beat a slow ass 5.0? spare me...you have no comprehension what power to weight ratio is.


you call me a ricer because i drive a honda....

im sure a 2100# civic hatch with a GSR swap and a wet kit with toda cams.

id put cash down that it would beat your POS.

 

a stock 88 5.0 is a joke. i wouldn't have wasted my time on one when i had my ss s/c

modded however, it could run a 10. you never know what the guy has under the hood..

 

I had a 90 mazda MX6 GT (sister car to the probe GT), they were quick in the day but would never run a 14.6 stock! maybe a 15.5!


And the 2.3L Turbo in the mustangs were not at all the same as the motor in the Probe GT/MX6...you lost some credability with this post. Whats a SHO mustang?????? haha

 

damn sorry i will do my homework next time.it has been a while since i have seen them..you are correct i forgot they were 2.3l...plus i had alot of work done to my probe, thats why it ran 14.6 i never said it was stock, i said it came stock 2.2 turbo..i had ecu chipped, greddy profec b spec2 boost control, full exhaust, intake, fat front tires, weight reduction, and ignition mods..14.6 was the best i got it to run.

1986 Ford Mustang SVO The last year for the SVO was 1986. In its last year it boasted a 2.3 intercooled turbo engine, dual exhaust, 200 horsepower with 240 torque, oil and water turbo cooling, a third brake light, and halogen bulb flush headlights.

It was an SVO mustang...i forgot i apologize...its been a while since i have seen them or even heard about them..next time i will read before i post.


agreed, sorry as well...damn people are quick to cut throats around here.

 

its like a box of chocolates..

i have an 88GT HO at the house.. stock i managed a 14.7 @ 94 with smoking 60' so dont under estimate him... it really boils down to how well the car was cared for and how well he can drive..
i have seen stock times in 5.0s from 13.8 - 15.8 depending on auto/manual and which trim edition

 

the 1986 SVO Mustang produced 235hp, the 1983-1985 produced 205hp. I don't know the torque on the 86 but the 83-85 produced 248ft.lbs.

 

Sorry I was trying to be a dick! I realize people jump all over other members for posting sometimes inaccurate or slightly streched info...So my apologies, Those older probes and MX6's responded well to mods, and no doubt with the mods you had would be running 14.6

 

they were some nice cars..its ashame they stopped making them..i remember the first time i saw one at the track years ago i couldnt believe it.. thanks for the correction on the numbers..i just pulled them off a ford forum so they probally are not 100% credible. thanks


lol apology accepted..i did jump on it too fast and should have read before i posted..but god i miss that car..they were quite the sleepers..that was my first car ever.

 

Ricers and your power to weight ratio....

I cant find the video, but there's this ricer guy saying his stock civic can outrun a lamborghinin murcielago cause his hp weight ratio was better than the lambo...

But let's just say you took the civic and put toda cams (wtf is toda) on it and nitrous then took a 5.0 mustang and put a cam in it with nitrous.....

Hmmm.... wtf do you think would happen?

 

Hey rice boy take the time and do your own math. Take your awesome POS and figure the ratio. Then figure the same for a 170-180whp 3200lbs Mustang.

And please don't call my GTO a POS because your fucked up dream tuner could beat it. Look at the mother ******* thing for christ sake. No wonder you ricer kids love anorexic bitches.

 

well you call me a ricer and i dont even have any ricey mods done to it. my **** ran 13.6 at 103 so call that a rice ride...

and yeah i did stomp a 5.0 but all you domestic guys just have your head up your asses and think anyone who drives an import is a ricer....thats just like anyone who drives a domestic is a hillbilly... spare me the bs

toda cams delete vtec and give you a better power band. it also helps tuning with nitrous.


and i beat the 5.0 before i got the cams,motor swap or the nitrous.

 

a mark 7 lincoln i have done some tuning work on used to have some serious lag issues.

it all comes down to how you tune it, and what size the a/r of the exhaust housings are.


in short. YES YOU CAN HAVE LAG WITH TWINS

 

wait so you ran a 13.6 with the swap, cams and nitrous, but you beat a fox with 100whp? was the fox running on one cylinder?

 

Not only did you not beat a 5.0 with 100hp your modded car would still get eaten alive by my car.

And your statements not your car makes you a ricer. When I see a soccer mom or old lady driving a Civic (since thats who there built for) I don't think what a ricer.

Although I am plenty sure 90% of the peopl who see your car think it's rice. By the way you talk there is no way it doesn't have a fart can.

 

The 5.0 either was f-ing with you or he had no clue how to drive and the car was f-ed up. We're not calling you rice cause you drive an import, alot of people on this site have imports. We're calling you rice cause you have the ricer attitude. Saying these insane mods that would beat us and how if you had them or whatever. Then calling us domestic guys.... No one says that but ricers. It's official you be rice...

 

i just picked up a 92 GT tonight- 5 speed w/308 gears, intake, exhaust, headers, cams, Ported/polished, race clutch, perfect body and paint for $5000.00, FAST AS HELL, when i looked at it, i thought it just had bolt ons; its supposed to be a 12 sec car, we will see. i drove a stock LX 5speed v8 yesterday, with only 75k on it and it was slow as *****, i think you will take him, just dont bet money till you here it run. . . that will tell a lot.

 

i didnt know you had a gto, i thought u had a cobalt...and so far not one cobalt SS/SC or a turbod one around here has even touched close to what i run.

for a civic my **** is fast. im not sure if your aware of what the hybrid swaps do, but they make quite a bit of power.

you take a 90hp hatch that runs 16.5 stock
drop a 200hp GSR motor with toda cams and a 50 shot

and you expect it not to run fast as hell. thats over 2x the power without any forced induction, with just the motor swap. last time i checked even if you did a FI setup on a stock block youd only make about 60% of the base hp. not 200%+

and on spray the **** is insane.


i dont have a ricer attitude, i just take pride in my ride.

oh and also, i didnt have a ricer attitude by saying a ****** stock 5.0 is slow. its the truth.

 

To each there own I guess.

I myself have never been impressed with even 10 second Civics well because look at it it's a Civic. I have always been about looks and performance but I guess the new generation doesn't care.

And seriously guys a 5.0 in nice condition will stay right with a SS/SC. The older 5.0 was rev happy and had a 6000rpm redline and isn't much slower than a 1999-2004 GT.

 

you think 13.6 is fast? that's ricer. And with "just" a swap? If i swapped any motor into my car it'd be making 400+whp all motor. u come in here acting like ur **** is fast being cocky as hell when in reality you did a motor swap a cam and nitrous and run mid-high 13's? If i spent the same amount you did on your civic in a fox i'd be running 11's. face the facts, you are wrong in this thread.

 

^^^^^Agreed

13.6 with a motor swap and you think you are completely badass...
My slobalt is faster than that...