2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.
View Poll Results: Best option for spool and power
Twin scroll .75 a/r with QSV
4
66.67%
Lower a/r
2
33.33%
Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll

Lower a/r vs. higher with QSV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2014, 05:49 PM
  #1  
574
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
574's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-16-11
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,434
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I am debating going to a lower a/r housing on my pte 5862 or going with a twin scroll and quick spool valve. Does lowering the a/r really kill power potential? I can only think of one guy on here that runs the QSV and hopefully he chimes in.

Basic question: if I lower my a/r could I still hit 600 horse with better spool?

Last edited by 574; 07-22-2014 at 06:09 PM.
Old 07-22-2014, 07:54 PM
  #2  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
mrbelvedere's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-05
Location: KY
Posts: 8,165
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
I got an idea make your own mind up
Old 07-22-2014, 08:03 PM
  #3  
574
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
574's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-16-11
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,434
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't know enough about a/r to make a decision right now. I don't wanna spend $1000 on a new twin scroll housing and QSV and come to find out I could still hit my goal with a lower a\r
Old 07-22-2014, 09:14 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
noorj's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-10
Location: motor city
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what aspect ratio is the current turbo
Old 07-22-2014, 09:17 PM
  #5  
574
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
574's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-16-11
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,434
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by noorj
what aspect ratio is the current turbo
I wanna say .63 because I remember there were 3 choices and I chose the middle one. It's a t4 flange
Old 07-22-2014, 09:41 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
TStone's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-21-11
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
They were just talking about this in ARM's group. You'd have better luck posting in there.
Old 07-22-2014, 09:52 PM
  #7  
Member
 
slitterell's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-29-12
Location: Denton Texas
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keeping the 5862? Just a larger AR with qsv?
Old 07-22-2014, 10:46 PM
  #8  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
mrbelvedere's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-05
Location: KY
Posts: 8,165
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
you need to get everything lined out before you make knee jerk decisions your not even close to having the car 100% that could change things with the current snail setup
Old 07-22-2014, 10:49 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
noorj's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-10
Location: motor city
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
you need to get everything lined out before you make knee jerk decisions your not even close to having the car 100% that could change things with the current snail setup
agree. do you have a 3" downpipe yet nick?
Old 07-23-2014, 01:42 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ATLsilverSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-22-09
Location: georgia
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your lower a/r will help spool but i wouldnt go lower than a .63 on that turbo. Too much backpressure going to put too much stress on the seals. If you are trying to make 600whp i dont know if youre gonna do that on a 58mm wheel. Sure the larger turbine will help but i dont know if it will help that much. Although i dont know the comp map (because there isnt one) of said wheel. If you want quicker spool i would switch to a 58mm turbine with the .63 housing. But that definitely wont get you 600whp. Really 500whp is that line where you have to sacrifice spool time for the desired power level as most "stg3" turbine wheels are 57-58mm and wont support much over 500 and going to a "stg5" turbine wheel which is usually in the 62mm range is going to add about 400-600rpm to spool time

I honestly didnt know much about the qsv until i read what paul wrote on arm's page. Im definitely gonna look more into it and may size up myself and run a qsv.
Old 07-23-2014, 05:51 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
BlkWdoSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too many changes to your build will delay finish, I would get it up and running first, if spool is awesome and making the power you need then I wouldnt invest in the qsv.

once you come around to wanting a bigger turbo then I would look at qsv
Old 07-23-2014, 06:04 PM
  #12  
574
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
574's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-16-11
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,434
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for the advice all. I'm going to continue hunting this spool issue. Has to be a bug somewhere because on 15psi everything was dandy. Full 3" fab pipe came in today so time to get busy
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
05-28-2022 03:47 AM
dennis69
Appearance
9
10-20-2015 04:49 PM
patooyee
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
50
10-15-2015 05:11 PM
Dylan Johnson
Suspension
9
09-30-2015 08:57 AM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
09-26-2015 06:44 PM



Quick Reply: Lower a/r vs. higher with QSV



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:08 AM.