2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.
View Poll Results: Best option for spool and power
Twin scroll .75 a/r with QSV
4
66.67%
Lower a/r
2
33.33%
Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll

Lower a/r vs. higher with QSV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2014 | 05:49 PM
  #1  
574's Avatar
574
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 11-16-11
Posts: 6,338
Likes: 2
From: Indiana
I am debating going to a lower a/r housing on my pte 5862 or going with a twin scroll and quick spool valve. Does lowering the a/r really kill power potential? I can only think of one guy on here that runs the QSV and hopefully he chimes in.

Basic question: if I lower my a/r could I still hit 600 horse with better spool?

Last edited by 574; Jul 22, 2014 at 06:09 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2014 | 07:54 PM
  #2  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
I got an idea make your own mind up
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2014 | 08:03 PM
  #3  
574's Avatar
574
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 11-16-11
Posts: 6,338
Likes: 2
From: Indiana
I don't know enough about a/r to make a decision right now. I don't wanna spend $1000 on a new twin scroll housing and QSV and come to find out I could still hit my goal with a lower a\r
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2014 | 09:14 PM
  #4  
noorj's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: 09-03-10
Posts: 2,746
Likes: 0
From: motor city
what aspect ratio is the current turbo
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2014 | 09:17 PM
  #5  
574's Avatar
574
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 11-16-11
Posts: 6,338
Likes: 2
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by noorj
what aspect ratio is the current turbo
I wanna say .63 because I remember there were 3 choices and I chose the middle one. It's a t4 flange
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2014 | 09:41 PM
  #6  
TStone's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 02-21-11
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 7
From: Dayton, Ohio
They were just talking about this in ARM's group. You'd have better luck posting in there.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2014 | 09:52 PM
  #7  
slitterell's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-29-12
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Denton Texas
Keeping the 5862? Just a larger AR with qsv?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2014 | 10:46 PM
  #8  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
you need to get everything lined out before you make knee jerk decisions your not even close to having the car 100% that could change things with the current snail setup
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2014 | 10:49 PM
  #9  
noorj's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: 09-03-10
Posts: 2,746
Likes: 0
From: motor city
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
you need to get everything lined out before you make knee jerk decisions your not even close to having the car 100% that could change things with the current snail setup
agree. do you have a 3" downpipe yet nick?
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 01:42 AM
  #10  
ATLsilverSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-09
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Your lower a/r will help spool but i wouldnt go lower than a .63 on that turbo. Too much backpressure going to put too much stress on the seals. If you are trying to make 600whp i dont know if youre gonna do that on a 58mm wheel. Sure the larger turbine will help but i dont know if it will help that much. Although i dont know the comp map (because there isnt one) of said wheel. If you want quicker spool i would switch to a 58mm turbine with the .63 housing. But that definitely wont get you 600whp. Really 500whp is that line where you have to sacrifice spool time for the desired power level as most "stg3" turbine wheels are 57-58mm and wont support much over 500 and going to a "stg5" turbine wheel which is usually in the 62mm range is going to add about 400-600rpm to spool time

I honestly didnt know much about the qsv until i read what paul wrote on arm's page. Im definitely gonna look more into it and may size up myself and run a qsv.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 05:51 PM
  #11  
BlkWdoSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Too many changes to your build will delay finish, I would get it up and running first, if spool is awesome and making the power you need then I wouldnt invest in the qsv.

once you come around to wanting a bigger turbo then I would look at qsv
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 06:04 PM
  #12  
574's Avatar
574
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 11-16-11
Posts: 6,338
Likes: 2
From: Indiana
Thanks for the advice all. I'm going to continue hunting this spool issue. Has to be a bug somewhere because on 15psi everything was dandy. Full 3" fab pipe came in today so time to get busy
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
dennis69
Appearance
9
Oct 20, 2015 04:49 PM
patooyee
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
50
Oct 15, 2015 05:11 PM
Dylan Johnson
Suspension
9
Sep 30, 2015 08:57 AM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
Sep 26, 2015 06:44 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 PM.