2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

M62 Supercharger Limit!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2005, 08:51 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
dirtySSout's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-14-05
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
M62 Supercharger Limit!

I talked with Magnuson today and they said our Eaton M62 Blower should not exceed 14,000 Max RPM. Does anyone know how fast our M62 Blower is spinning with the stock 3.5 inch pulley? I was told by the tech at Magnuson to measure the blower pulley and the crank pulley, then calculate the ratio between the two. Then I should be able to tell the stock operating blower rpm. uh okay....Lil help please.....
Old 07-14-2005, 09:05 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
3fo893013L's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-30-05
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
14,000 is all you can get out of it anyways You would get away with the 2.8' pulley but I won't recommend any lower. Just makes a **** load of heat and won't measure any real results.
Old 07-14-2005, 09:08 PM
  #3  
The Stig
 
MarcS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-05
Location: New York
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
http://www.harrop.com.au/root_folder...eaton-m62.html

found some info on it. It says it's max output is 2bar. 1 bar is 14.7 so 2 bar must be 29.4psi.

I dont think it is even close to 14,000 rpm with the 3.5 pulley.

I doubt it's safe to run it at 2bar, It would probably decrease the life of the blower dramatically.
Old 07-15-2005, 10:32 PM
  #4  
Member
 
DanM's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-25-05
Location: Canada
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the stock crank pulley is 6.375". If the stock SC pulley is 3.5", that means at 6500 engine rpm, the SC is at ~11,800. With a 2.8" SC pulley, 6500 engine rpm would give you 14,800.
Old 07-16-2005, 01:20 PM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
dirtySSout's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-14-05
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks guyz! That helps! DanM if your right about the ratio then the 2.8in. pulley is too small for the M62 blower. It would cause it to run 800rpm over it's max rpm. Why would manufactures produce these small pulleys without doing proper research. That could ruin our blowers!
Old 07-16-2005, 02:13 PM
  #6  
Member
 
DanM's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-25-05
Location: Canada
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dirtySSout
Thanks guyz! That helps! DanM if your right about the ratio then the 2.8in. pulley is too small for the M62 blower. It would cause it to run 800rpm over it's max rpm. Why would manufactures produce these small pulleys without doing proper research. That could ruin our blowers!
Who says 14,000rpm is the maximum, and that damage will result if spun faster?

I'm not arguing with you, just asking where you got the information (and I don't think Magnusson, a competing company, is the best source).

Eaton's website shows the SC operating in a normal, linear region up to 14,000rpm. I would think from that, that it is probably just fine at 14,800. It may not be flowing much more (and just making more heat), but I doubt any damage will result.
Old 07-20-2005, 08:55 PM
  #7  
Yaj
New Member
 
Yaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-08-05
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just some FYI...

On the Series II M90 SC Eaton shows charts only going up to 12000 rpm. It once was thought that going over 12k rpm wouldn't yeild any positive results...well if you check with the 3800SC guys now many of them are spinning the blower over 14k...just have to have the mods to support it.
Old 07-21-2005, 05:21 PM
  #8  
New Member
 
jmonte345's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-05
Location: At Work
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DanM
Who says 14,000rpm is the maximum, and that damage will result if spun faster?

I'm not arguing with you, just asking where you got the information (and I don't think Magnusson, a competing company, is the best source).
They are not competing compains.

"Eaton Supercharger Division is the largest manufacturer of automotive superchargers in the world. They manufacture superchargers for original equipment applications for several models of Mercedes Benz, General Motors, Ford, Nissan, Aston Martin, and Jaguar with others in the works. Magnuson Products, Inc. handles service and the aftermarket for Eaton Supercharger Division and provides superchargers to a number of companies that design and manufacture the installation system for specific applications. Magnuson Products, Inc. provides more superchargers for aftermarket applications than any other supercharger manufacturer in the world."


I've heard that 14,000 rpms is the maximum that Eaton recommends but the psi-fi kit is using a 2.8 pulley in thier kit and I think you'd be ok running one as long as you can get someone to tune your computer.
Old 07-21-2005, 06:58 PM
  #9  
New Member
 
ydtrack's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-28-05
Location: China Lake, CA
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Magnuson / Eaton tend to be VERY conservative with requards to SC RPM's, however at some point you will exceed the volumetric efficiency of the blower.

Here is some interesting info I found on the CAPA website.

MP62
Old 04-09-2011, 12:06 PM
  #10  
New Member
 
ty07scss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-27-09
Location: kc ks
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well according to your same formula and i have a 2.85 pulley and redline at 7300rpm...
my stock m62 is just above 16,620rpm lol
Old 04-09-2011, 12:27 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
red06SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-10-08
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dirtySSout
Thanks guyz! That helps! DanM if your right about the ratio then the 2.8in. pulley is too small for the M62 blower. It would cause it to run 800rpm over it's max rpm. Why would manufactures produce these small pulleys without doing proper research. That could ruin our blowers!
They know EXACTLY what they're doing..

There are many people who have went all the way down to a 2.5" pulley, it's not going to be some dramatic failure - or kill your engine, it's just harder on the bearings.
Old 04-09-2011, 12:39 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
selfinfliction's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-23-05
Location: ky
Posts: 8,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dirtySSout
I talked with Magnuson today and they said our Eaton M62 Blower should not exceed 14,000 Max RPM.
i also heard that you shouldn't drive faster than 55mph on the highway too.... not sure many people care though!
Old 04-09-2011, 12:44 PM
  #13  
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
blewis13's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-22-09
Location: STL
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thread is nearly 6 years old. lol
Old 04-09-2011, 12:46 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
srt-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-04-10
Location: Edmonton,Alberta,Canada
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yea i wouldnt go by that "shouldnt go past 14,000rpm" bs...i ran a 2.8" pulley and my rev limit was 7500rpm...so i was well over the "14,000" limit and never had issues. I know guys that went to 2.6...some popped there engine but nothing happend to their blower.
Old 04-09-2011, 02:52 PM
  #15  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Zooomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-13-05
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Keep your pants on. We've gone to 20,000 rpm.
Old 04-10-2011, 12:31 AM
  #16  
New Member
 
SPLREDLINE's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-10-07
Location: california I.E.
Posts: 67
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been running a 2.85 pullies with 42 lb injectors for 5 years and over 100,000 miles. I am going to say you will alright. I have yet to rebuild my supercharger but I have changedd the oil twice.
Old 04-10-2011, 01:20 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
WickedSS2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-02-05
Location: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
For fucksake, there is a difference between SUSTAINED max rpm and max EFFICIENCY. I ran a 2.6 on an M62 for 50k miles. Not a single issue. No grinding. No knocking of the rotors. The motors of these cars are below 3k rpm which will NOT "max" the m62 out on rpms.

Use common sense.

You also do not need to change the oil until 100k
Old 04-10-2011, 11:36 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-02-06
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sure you can rev it as high as you want but anything below 2.7in pulley is just a heat pump
Old 04-10-2011, 12:42 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
WickedSS2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-02-05
Location: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
My statement is still true and I didn't have much trouble with heat. :shrug:
Old 04-12-2011, 11:40 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ebristol's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: WI
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I have ran my belt right on the hub of the SC for 100k miles with no problems! lol

I don't know how many more of these LSJ Tech threads I can handle. Must stop now....

Last edited by ebristol; 04-12-2011 at 11:40 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 04-12-2011, 11:44 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
ecot3c inside's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-31-10
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
um anyone notice it's from 2005?
Old 04-12-2011, 11:55 PM
  #22  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by WickedSS2005
For fucksake, there is a difference between SUSTAINED max rpm and max EFFICIENCY. I ran a 2.6 on an M62 for 50k miles. Not a single issue. No grinding. No knocking of the rotors. The motors of these cars are below 3k rpm which will NOT "max" the m62 out on rpms.

Use common sense.

You also do not need to change the oil until 100k
This.
Old 04-13-2011, 12:06 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
WickedSS2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-02-05
Location: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
[caps]Thank you[/caps]
Old 04-13-2011, 06:57 AM
  #24  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by ebristol
I have ran my belt right on the hub of the SC for 100k miles with no problems! lol

I don't know how many more of these LSJ Tech threads I can handle. Must stop now....
They are getting bad lately!!
Old 04-13-2011, 10:56 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
ecot3c inside's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-31-10
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well who's the tard that bumped a 6 year thread?! Then he posts it acting like he might get a response from the guy


Quick Reply: M62 Supercharger Limit!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 AM.