2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

M62 Supercharger Limit!

Old Jul 14, 2005 | 08:51 PM
  #1  
dirtySSout's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 07-14-05
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Lawrenceville, GA
M62 Supercharger Limit!

I talked with Magnuson today and they said our Eaton M62 Blower should not exceed 14,000 Max RPM. Does anyone know how fast our M62 Blower is spinning with the stock 3.5 inch pulley? I was told by the tech at Magnuson to measure the blower pulley and the crank pulley, then calculate the ratio between the two. Then I should be able to tell the stock operating blower rpm. uh okay....Lil help please.....
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2005 | 09:05 PM
  #2  
3fo893013L's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-30-05
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 0
14,000 is all you can get out of it anyways You would get away with the 2.8' pulley but I won't recommend any lower. Just makes a **** load of heat and won't measure any real results.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2005 | 09:08 PM
  #3  
MarcS's Avatar
The Stig
 
Joined: 05-11-05
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 1
From: New York
http://www.harrop.com.au/root_folder...eaton-m62.html

found some info on it. It says it's max output is 2bar. 1 bar is 14.7 so 2 bar must be 29.4psi.

I dont think it is even close to 14,000 rpm with the 3.5 pulley.

I doubt it's safe to run it at 2bar, It would probably decrease the life of the blower dramatically.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 10:32 PM
  #4  
DanM's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Canada
I think the stock crank pulley is 6.375". If the stock SC pulley is 3.5", that means at 6500 engine rpm, the SC is at ~11,800. With a 2.8" SC pulley, 6500 engine rpm would give you 14,800.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 01:20 PM
  #5  
dirtySSout's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 07-14-05
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Lawrenceville, GA
Thanks guyz! That helps! DanM if your right about the ratio then the 2.8in. pulley is too small for the M62 blower. It would cause it to run 800rpm over it's max rpm. Why would manufactures produce these small pulleys without doing proper research. That could ruin our blowers!
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 02:13 PM
  #6  
DanM's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by dirtySSout
Thanks guyz! That helps! DanM if your right about the ratio then the 2.8in. pulley is too small for the M62 blower. It would cause it to run 800rpm over it's max rpm. Why would manufactures produce these small pulleys without doing proper research. That could ruin our blowers!
Who says 14,000rpm is the maximum, and that damage will result if spun faster?

I'm not arguing with you, just asking where you got the information (and I don't think Magnusson, a competing company, is the best source).

Eaton's website shows the SC operating in a normal, linear region up to 14,000rpm. I would think from that, that it is probably just fine at 14,800. It may not be flowing much more (and just making more heat), but I doubt any damage will result.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 08:55 PM
  #7  
Yaj's Avatar
Yaj
New Member
 
Joined: 04-08-05
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
Just some FYI...

On the Series II M90 SC Eaton shows charts only going up to 12000 rpm. It once was thought that going over 12k rpm wouldn't yeild any positive results...well if you check with the 3800SC guys now many of them are spinning the blower over 14k...just have to have the mods to support it.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 05:21 PM
  #8  
jmonte345's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-20-05
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: At Work
Originally Posted by DanM
Who says 14,000rpm is the maximum, and that damage will result if spun faster?

I'm not arguing with you, just asking where you got the information (and I don't think Magnusson, a competing company, is the best source).
They are not competing compains.

"Eaton Supercharger Division is the largest manufacturer of automotive superchargers in the world. They manufacture superchargers for original equipment applications for several models of Mercedes Benz, General Motors, Ford, Nissan, Aston Martin, and Jaguar with others in the works. Magnuson Products, Inc. handles service and the aftermarket for Eaton Supercharger Division and provides superchargers to a number of companies that design and manufacture the installation system for specific applications. Magnuson Products, Inc. provides more superchargers for aftermarket applications than any other supercharger manufacturer in the world."


I've heard that 14,000 rpms is the maximum that Eaton recommends but the psi-fi kit is using a 2.8 pulley in thier kit and I think you'd be ok running one as long as you can get someone to tune your computer.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 06:58 PM
  #9  
ydtrack's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-28-05
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: China Lake, CA
Magnuson / Eaton tend to be VERY conservative with requards to SC RPM's, however at some point you will exceed the volumetric efficiency of the blower.

Here is some interesting info I found on the CAPA website.

MP62
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2011 | 12:06 PM
  #10  
ty07scss's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-27-09
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: kc ks
well according to your same formula and i have a 2.85 pulley and redline at 7300rpm...
my stock m62 is just above 16,620rpm lol
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2011 | 12:27 PM
  #11  
red06SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-10-08
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
From: Richmond
Originally Posted by dirtySSout
Thanks guyz! That helps! DanM if your right about the ratio then the 2.8in. pulley is too small for the M62 blower. It would cause it to run 800rpm over it's max rpm. Why would manufactures produce these small pulleys without doing proper research. That could ruin our blowers!
They know EXACTLY what they're doing..

There are many people who have went all the way down to a 2.5" pulley, it's not going to be some dramatic failure - or kill your engine, it's just harder on the bearings.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2011 | 12:39 PM
  #12  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by dirtySSout
I talked with Magnuson today and they said our Eaton M62 Blower should not exceed 14,000 Max RPM.
i also heard that you shouldn't drive faster than 55mph on the highway too.... not sure many people care though!
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2011 | 12:44 PM
  #13  
blewis13's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-22-09
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: STL
Thread is nearly 6 years old. lol
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2011 | 12:46 PM
  #14  
srt-10's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-04-10
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton,Alberta,Canada
Yea i wouldnt go by that "shouldnt go past 14,000rpm" bs...i ran a 2.8" pulley and my rev limit was 7500rpm...so i was well over the "14,000" limit and never had issues. I know guys that went to 2.6...some popped there engine but nothing happend to their blower.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2011 | 02:52 PM
  #15  
Zooomer's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 3
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Keep your pants on. We've gone to 20,000 rpm.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2011 | 12:31 AM
  #16  
SPLREDLINE's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-10-07
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: california I.E.
I have been running a 2.85 pullies with 42 lb injectors for 5 years and over 100,000 miles. I am going to say you will alright. I have yet to rebuild my supercharger but I have changedd the oil twice.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2011 | 01:20 AM
  #17  
WickedSS2005's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
For fucksake, there is a difference between SUSTAINED max rpm and max EFFICIENCY. I ran a 2.6 on an M62 for 50k miles. Not a single issue. No grinding. No knocking of the rotors. The motors of these cars are below 3k rpm which will NOT "max" the m62 out on rpms.

Use common sense.

You also do not need to change the oil until 100k
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2011 | 11:36 AM
  #18  
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
sure you can rev it as high as you want but anything below 2.7in pulley is just a heat pump
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2011 | 12:42 PM
  #19  
WickedSS2005's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
My statement is still true and I didn't have much trouble with heat. :shrug:
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 11:40 PM
  #20  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
I have ran my belt right on the hub of the SC for 100k miles with no problems! lol

I don't know how many more of these LSJ Tech threads I can handle. Must stop now....

Last edited by ebristol; Apr 12, 2011 at 11:40 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 11:44 PM
  #21  
ecot3c inside's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: 03-31-10
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
um anyone notice it's from 2005?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 11:55 PM
  #22  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by WickedSS2005
For fucksake, there is a difference between SUSTAINED max rpm and max EFFICIENCY. I ran a 2.6 on an M62 for 50k miles. Not a single issue. No grinding. No knocking of the rotors. The motors of these cars are below 3k rpm which will NOT "max" the m62 out on rpms.

Use common sense.

You also do not need to change the oil until 100k
This.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2011 | 12:06 AM
  #23  
WickedSS2005's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
[caps]Thank you[/caps]
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2011 | 06:57 AM
  #24  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by ebristol
I have ran my belt right on the hub of the SC for 100k miles with no problems! lol

I don't know how many more of these LSJ Tech threads I can handle. Must stop now....
They are getting bad lately!!
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2011 | 10:56 AM
  #25  
ecot3c inside's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: 03-31-10
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
well who's the tard that bumped a 6 year thread?! Then he posts it acting like he might get a response from the guy
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 AM.