g/cyl @ WOT to high?
g/cyl @ WOT to high?
This is on a 2.7, 3" jbp header back exhaust to a stock muffler, 45-50* temps outside, meth off.
The MAF is copy pasted from the GM stg 2 tune: ACTUAL AFR = 11.6-11.8
208 kpa, 15.x psi

--------
This is when I ran a 2.9 w/ the stock exhaust manifold, stock dp, 2.5 catback, no meth.
MAF was exactly the same as my current tune on the car, shown in the log shot above.
KPA 203 or 14.74 PSI

-----------------
By dropping to a 2.7, is my g/cyl really supposed to raise that much? According to a local tuner, I have excessive pressure. But I am no longer blowing the dipstick. And the comp. test was a pass both times I checked.
Another question... you'll notice in the top screenshot my timing at WOT is 13*, when in the editor Im commanding 18*; why am I only seeing 13*?
I'm not seeing any knock at the top of the pull; so I don't think it could be spark decay taking away timing....? CONFUSED...
Thanks
The MAF is copy pasted from the GM stg 2 tune: ACTUAL AFR = 11.6-11.8
208 kpa, 15.x psi

--------
This is when I ran a 2.9 w/ the stock exhaust manifold, stock dp, 2.5 catback, no meth.
MAF was exactly the same as my current tune on the car, shown in the log shot above.
KPA 203 or 14.74 PSI

-----------------
By dropping to a 2.7, is my g/cyl really supposed to raise that much? According to a local tuner, I have excessive pressure. But I am no longer blowing the dipstick. And the comp. test was a pass both times I checked.
Another question... you'll notice in the top screenshot my timing at WOT is 13*, when in the editor Im commanding 18*; why am I only seeing 13*?
I'm not seeing any knock at the top of the pull; so I don't think it could be spark decay taking away timing....? CONFUSED...
Thanks
Last edited by Steven Flit; Dec 27, 2008 at 04:13 AM.
OK, now this is just comedy. For a TUNER to say you have excessive cylinder pressure without knock. No significant way to make more power without more cylinder pressure. Compression / leakdown tests aren't a conclusive indicator of engine health. These mid/high 100's psi is nothing compared to what these cylinders see when there is actual combustion taking place.
By dropping to a 2.7, is my g/cyl really supposed to raise that much? According to a local tuner, I have excessive pressure. But I am no longer blowing the dipstick. And the comp. test was a pass both times I checked.
Another question... you'll notice in the top screenshot my timing at WOT is 13*, when in the editor Im commanding 18*; why am I only seeing 13*?
I'm not seeing any knock at the top of the pull; so I don't think it could be spark decay taking away timing....? CONFUSED...
Thanks
Another question... you'll notice in the top screenshot my timing at WOT is 13*, when in the editor Im commanding 18*; why am I only seeing 13*?
I'm not seeing any knock at the top of the pull; so I don't think it could be spark decay taking away timing....? CONFUSED...
Thanks
Thats what I thought to.. Though the local tuner has the same maf as me. We're both running the GM stg 2 maf. Only differences in our setup are a 2.8 pulley, and a header(im on jbp he' has the zzp mid length).
He's seeing g/cyl topping in the 1.04 cell range like my 2.9 pulley.
I'm gonna guess the 2.7 creates :that much more: g/cyl, compared to a 2.8 or 2.9 pulley. Wonder what meth will do when i turn it on...?
Last question...
Why is it I'm seeing 13* of timing in my log, when in the "EDITOR" under high octane spark advance I inputted 18* of timing in the same cell range.
He's seeing g/cyl topping in the 1.04 cell range like my 2.9 pulley.
I'm gonna guess the 2.7 creates :that much more: g/cyl, compared to a 2.8 or 2.9 pulley. Wonder what meth will do when i turn it on...?
Last question...
Why is it I'm seeing 13* of timing in my log, when in the "EDITOR" under high octane spark advance I inputted 18* of timing in the same cell range.
Thanks for the info on the g/cyl
Been having a ever so slight oil leak from the valve cover gasket on the passenger side. Since I solved the dipstick popping issue by undoing the bolt connecting it to the intake manifold, I believe that ruled out the possibility of excessive crank case pressure...
After A QUICK look at what gasket we use to mate the valve cover to the head... I'm surprised it held up for 30k of abuse on a aggressive tune.
New valve cover gasket is due to arrive some time this week... slight delay thanks to the holidays and the weekend.
Will do, I'll just do a quick copy paste when I go out and finish tuning the car.
Thanks for the info on the g/cyl
Been having a ever so slight oil leak from the valve cover gasket on the passenger side. Since I solved the dipstick popping issue by undoing the bolt connecting it to the intake manifold, I believe that ruled out the possibility of excessive crank case pressure...
After A QUICK look at what gasket we use to mate the valve cover to the head... I'm surprised it held up for 30k of abuse on a aggressive tune.
New valve cover gasket is due to arrive some time this week... slight delay thanks to the holidays and the weekend.
Thanks for the info on the g/cyl
Been having a ever so slight oil leak from the valve cover gasket on the passenger side. Since I solved the dipstick popping issue by undoing the bolt connecting it to the intake manifold, I believe that ruled out the possibility of excessive crank case pressure...
After A QUICK look at what gasket we use to mate the valve cover to the head... I'm surprised it held up for 30k of abuse on a aggressive tune.
New valve cover gasket is due to arrive some time this week... slight delay thanks to the holidays and the weekend.
I keep changing my cars power; in fact at the momment I dunno where its exactly starting to make a decent amount of trq.
we'll go to mexico and give it whirl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turbo Johnny
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
Feb 21, 2019 09:41 AM
Sl0wbaltSS
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
Nov 21, 2018 11:11 PM




