look here to see good news on the 2.4 engine
look here to see good news on the 2.4 engine
http://www.solsticeforum.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=18833
future is looking good for durability and the solstice being the test mule lol
future is looking good for durability and the solstice being the test mule lol
Originally Posted by celicacobalt
http://www.solsticeforum.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=18833
future is looking good for durability and the solstice being the test mule lol
future is looking good for durability and the solstice being the test mule lol
Originally Posted by g5mike
Im surprised they did all this without lowering the compression
Thats alot of power( stage 3), this is why i would not go that far,I love the car as a daily driver and I think I would stop at stage 2
Originally Posted by JMHZ2401
But why?? Higher compression is not that bad of a thing. You just have to have it tuned correctly. Lower compression is more forgiving on bad tunes. YOu can make more power with higher compression on the same boost level if tuned correctly. This is how most of the race teams in FWD racing do. With HPTuners out you have better tuning. I think more boost will be possible than where they are currently.
Wait until you get addicted to the power!!!
Wait until you get addicted to the power!!!
I dont know... what really impressed me about that thread is that they are running a stage 3 kit on stock internals. That's pretty amazing.... especially considering the amount of boost they were running. So much for the theory that our engines can't handle boost.
Originally Posted by PpAzZ1101
I dont know... what really impressed me about that thread is that they are running a stage 3 kit on stock internals. That's pretty amazing.... especially considering the amount of boost they were running. So much for the theory that our engines can't handle boost.
Originally Posted by YoAdrian
I was thinking the same thing.
who is making those stage kits for them?...hahn?....and also that just goes to show you that our cars are gonna be badass once we get a urbo an some stage ks...i think the ss/sc is good...but it is limited on how much powr it can make...where as a tubo for our car is pretty much lmitless for the tie being...thats just what i think though
i don't understand this concept of lower compression = more boost. it's not that simple. a supercharger does not "ram" more air and fuel in, it raises the air pressure on the inlet side of the motor. the intake stroke still is what fills the engine with air/fuel. the same volume of air with the same amout of fuel will produce ROUGHLY the same power regardless of where that air comes from.
high compression engines actually do better under low boost situations because there is less possibility of surge at low boost. if you think a knock is bad, try a boost surge. that'll ruin your night.
high compression engines actually do better under low boost situations because there is less possibility of surge at low boost. if you think a knock is bad, try a boost surge. that'll ruin your night.
You guy! if I have a change of heart, and get a truck also,then maybe, i just might Turbo only if i have that second vehicle,Insurance is stupid here they make you take out individual policies if you own two vehicles instead of stacking them
Originally Posted by mike25
who is making those stage kits for them?...hahn?....and also that just goes to show you that our cars are gonna be badass once we get a urbo an some stage ks...i think the ss/sc is good...but it is limited on how much powr it can make...where as a tubo for our car is pretty much lmitless for the tie being...thats just what i think though
Originally Posted by PpAzZ1101
So much for the theory that our engines can't handle boost.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



.
