2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

2007 HP increase torque decrease

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 03:26 PM
  #1  
tonio5555's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-05
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 0
From: USA
2007 HP increase torque decrease

For the model years 2005 and 2006 the stock 2.2 L61 engine was rated at 145hp and 155lbs. of torque, however http://www.chevrolet.com/cobalt/specifications/ lists the 2.2 Ecotec at 148hp and 152lb.-ft of torque. Why the change? Is the factory tuning for the 2007 model year different or are these new numbers just a revalution of what the L61 was always putting out?
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 03:27 PM
  #2  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by tonio5555
For the model years 2005 and 2006 the stock 2.2 L61 engine was rated at 145hp and 155lbs. of torque, however http://www.chevrolet.com/cobalt/specifications/ lists the 2.2 Ecotec at 148hp and 152lb.-ft of torque. Why the change? Is the factory tuning for the 2007 model year different or are these new numbers just a revalution of what the L61 was always putting out?
i actually think hm has a new rating system. I don't remember where i heard it, but i did hear it somewhere.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 03:36 PM
  #3  
YellowLT's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-24-05
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
The SAE is pushing it's new HP rating Standard.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 08:33 PM
  #4  
YSUsteven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-19-06
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
From: North Carlonia
Originally Posted by tonio5555
For the model years 2005 and 2006 the stock 2.2 L61 engine was rated at 145hp and 155lbs. of torque, however http://www.chevrolet.com/cobalt/specifications/ lists the 2.2 Ecotec at 148hp and 152lb.-ft of torque. Why the change? Is the factory tuning for the 2007 model year different or are these new numbers just a revalution of what the L61 was always putting out?
Probably has same amount of power, notice the torque is rated at a different rpm, 155 @ 4000 (2006) 152 @ 4200 (2007)

hp only jumped by 3, not worth anything.

Just retested the motor, manufacturing chould have change tollerances by a few thousandths, chould be the reason for the 3 hp up and 3 tq down.

Bottom line
Its the same engine and has the same amount of power. (not enough for me )
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 05:27 AM
  #5  
IonNinja's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-29-05
Posts: 7,915
Likes: 0
From: AZ
what really sucks is the Ion is still rated at 140HP and 145HP, I wonder if you guys REALLY have us on tq or is that just Chevy BS.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 10:58 AM
  #6  
RedBaseBolt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-28-05
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 1
From: Oshawa, ONT
It's probably in the way our exhaust works or intake ducts or something. Or Chevy BS
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 09:02 AM
  #7  
forcedgminduction's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-09-05
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: texas
the ion has the elctric power steering also, right? cuz the last year cavs didnt and they had the same 2.2 with 5 horses and 5 lbs of torque missing.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 09:07 PM
  #8  
IonNinja's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-29-05
Posts: 7,915
Likes: 0
From: AZ
the Ions have electric steering

ion 2.2's dyno at 120whp stock, haven't really seen a 2.2 cobalt stock dyno
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 05:12 PM
  #9  
nomoreavril's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
my auto cobalt dynod at 117/119
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zharrington_2010LNF
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
21
Feb 8, 2016 01:43 PM
RaginChopsuey
War Stories
16
Oct 27, 2015 01:27 PM
agentirons
Electronics, Audio, and Video
2
Oct 16, 2015 02:11 AM
TedSS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
26
Oct 10, 2015 04:30 PM
Jesse
Problems/Service/Maintenance
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:51 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19 PM.