i was on crate engine depot and looking at replacement ecotecs. noticed the 2.2 and 2.4 are more expensive than the 2.0 whats up with that?

 

more displacement=more money
the 2.0 doesnt come with the supercharger...so its just a destroked L61 (with the stronger parts) probably putting like 120bHP

 

Yeah that what I would have said....

 

But shouldnt the stronger parts make the 2.0 engine more expensive than the 2.2?? and its more rare if you want then the 2.2, so supply demand??

 

I did notice the MSRP is the same for all 3 engines....Why the price they are offering them differs may have to do with their stock.

 

the lower comp on the 2.0 w/o f/i would make it a dog i'd think, regardless of the internals - you're going to have to boost it to make it worth driving. the 2.2 and 2.4 are good "outta the box".

convenience: that's why the 20oz soda's are as much if not more than the 2 litres.

 

^^^ He has a 2.2

 

I wouldn't place any significance on the prices. There's no hidden meanings in which is more expensive.

 

um.... ok?

 

I thought the 2.4 engine would be the most cause its the most advanced of the 3 engines

 

I was thinking the 2.0 would be because of all the forged parts, but the 2.4 could rank up there because of the VVT.

 

hey thats kinda neat. any links backing this up and some numbers posted please? thanks

 

here you go
http://www.crateenginedepot.com/stor...ines-C195.aspx