2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Question about HP Rating

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 01:59 AM
  #1  
OneLunG's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 06-04-05
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Juneau, Alaska
Question about HP Rating

This is a big debate among my car group - They swear up and down our car is not rated by WHP - I was under the impression when Chevy put our car out they rated it 205 WHP


Am I just totally smoking crack with this? or on the ball?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 06:32 AM
  #2  
SilverSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-03-05
Posts: 4,272
Likes: 0
From: South Bend , Indiana
Gm uses crank power figures for its rated outputs . GM also has a tendancy to undertate the #'s on alot of its performance cars .
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 06:41 AM
  #3  
olddude's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-01-05
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Actually the SAE standard calls for it to be measured with the flywheel in place and all accessories attached (a/c, exhaust, alternator, w/p, etc). If the engine did not have to spin that flywheel and was measured at the crank, power numbers would jump up. Just to clarify though, no manufacturer rates power at the rear wheels (or at the rear of a transmission for that matter), it is all at the flywheel.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 10:43 AM
  #4  
OneLunG's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 06-04-05
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Juneau, Alaska
so our cars were rated at the flywheel and not WHP?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 12:16 PM
  #5  
Xenozx's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-01-05
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Yes the fake # that you where given 205 they do not claim to be from the wheels. they follow the same route as the focus civic etc. Its not at the wheels.

Now that # in most cases is complete bull crap. Most people that Ive seen dyno's from are anywhere from 210-220 to the wheels. So as someone was mentioning the 205 # was pulled out of thin air. That was probably for insurance purposes etc. Dodge did the same with the SRT 4.

your car is about 210-220 at the wheels. but GM doesnt give those #'s out.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 12:50 PM
  #6  
97cavie24ls's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-14-05
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
From: phoenix , az
well several things come into to play when giving out the rated #s for said motor

advertised power is usually done at a certain rpm , also when most companies give out that number and rpm , they have tested alot of motors , and find a commom range and power level for the motors tested

say 205 @ 5600 (example only) , and that would be the number they give out

also the 2.0s/c can run on 87 octane gas , and im guessing that the reason for the low dyno #'s compaired to what everyone is getting has to due with the motor being run on 87 during the dyno testing , and the computer pulling out the timing to make it run on 87

even though gm says to use 91

it is the only sane reason i can come up with as to why the s/c motor dyno's at the wheels higher than the rated hp
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
Zharrington_2010LNF
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
21
Feb 8, 2016 01:43 PM
brandon04
Problems/Service/Maintenance
46
Oct 21, 2015 07:04 AM
Extremespeed
South Pacific
0
Sep 29, 2015 04:34 AM
Iceberg
Drivetrain
1
Sep 28, 2015 01:31 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 AM.