General Cobalt General Cobalt, Pursuit, and Ion talk. Post specific discussions in the forums below

Follow up on educated CAI opinion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 01:58 PM
  #1  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Follow up on educated CAI opinion

check on the follow up.

HTML Code:
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums//showthread.php?t=7692
This is my father's reply to the comments-

After reading the responses to my comments on the Cobalt SS website I thought it appropriate to ad some additional remarks.
I should not have used the negative comments I used in my remarks. They were inappropriate, uncalled for, in bad taste, unprofessional, and many cases inaccurate. Please accept my apology.

My comments were meant to address the popular opinion that the Magnuson-Moss Act allows consumers to MODIFY their vehicle without fear of consequence as it relates to warranty.More an that in a minute.

I also did not mean to condemn CAIs as a MODIFICATION, I used a CAI as a generic example of a MODIFICATION that could result in serious ramifications.
The M-M act was passed in 1975. You can read it online as well as considerable litigation related directly and indirectly. The acts primary purpose was to give Consumers specific rights in obtaining clear information regarding what a warranty did and did not do.Of course the M-M Act grew, became more vague, and the related litigation resulted in even more confusion in some cases. The act had some very positive results for consumers and aftermarket suppliers of auto and truck parts. Without the M-M Act there might not be an Automotive Aftermarket today. All in all it works.

The M-M Act has been used to allow REPLACEMENT parts to be used on a vehicle and not void the original warranty. REPLACEMENT parts are those that are designed to fit and perform like the original parts. Items like filters, spark plugs, ignition parts, wheel bearings, accessory drive belt etc. fit into the category of REPLACEMENT parts.Time and time again the use of quality replacement parts have been protected by the M-M Act.This is a huge issue in the Heavy Equipment industry.

Parts that MODIFY a vehicle and vary from OEM design and function are not REPLACEMENT parts. The usage of parts designed to MODIFY a vehicle may not be protected by the M-M Act. A CAI is a MODIFICATION not a replacement part.

Your Warranty Manual has specific verbiage regarding vehicle modifications. Of course in the unfortunate event of a warranty claim, the repairing dealer will make the initial determination as to whether or not your mods affect your claim.

Enough about M-M. I wish we could modify our cars into full on race cars and have them covered by a warranty....I think it is unlikely.
Zinner, you are right. This board has some very knowledgeable people who contribute.

Again for those offended, I apologize.

Now my 2 cents on how to go quicker. For those concerned with acceleration from a stop ( which seems to be most of the readers based on the quoted 1/4 mile times) forget the motor moods. A stock SS overpowers the tires as is. Spend the $$$ on a pair of steelies and some drag radials and watch the e.t.s drop. Or spend your money on a CAI or a header and look good smoking the tires and racing your DYNO chart.Traction first ( it is cheaper) hp next.

Let me know what you guys think

Last edited by MarcS; Nov 10, 2005 at 02:17 PM. Reason: seperated parahraphs for readability
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 03:59 PM
  #2  
Malaclypse's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-29-05
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Nice work man. Couldn't have said it better myself unless I read the entire M-M act... =p
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 04:51 PM
  #3  
Dman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-20-04
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
From: USaaayyyy
its always been my opinion that a modification is a replacement part, just like a replacement part is a modification...you take the stock air filter out and replace it with a k&N filter, youve mad a modification. reguardless of definition of parts, the dealer has to prove that the modification or replacement part caused the problem. ive work as a service writer for chevrolet, cadillac, mitsubishi (all one dealer), and for honda and acura (one dealer as well). so i know what people can get away with and what we as the dealer have to try and prove beyond a resonable doubt.

and i didnt see the other thread so i dunno what you guys are talkin bout...lol
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 05:38 PM
  #4  
Erod's Avatar
Moderator Alumni
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 07-14-04
Posts: 6,259
Likes: 4
From: Youngstown, Ohio
Cool.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 06:24 PM
  #5  
phxSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-05
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
From: Buckeye, Az
True, a good set of tires should be one of the first things someone should buy.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 10:58 PM
  #6  
averagewhiteboy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-23-05
Posts: 8,761
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
If you have a good suspension, a good set of brakes, and some good tires on ANYTHING, the car will perform. That's just how it is. You can put all of that into a Topaz and it'll probably run very well. But why would you want to do that?!

:P
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 03:59 AM
  #7  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
yea so that made no sense at all
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
Tupp
Suspension
5
Sep 30, 2015 08:18 PM
importkiller
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
Sep 30, 2015 07:18 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM
Extreme Dimensions
South Pacific
0
Sep 24, 2015 07:51 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22 AM.