08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion Discuss the 2008 - 2009 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbocharged. On sale since the second quarter of 2008.

08 cobalt ss vs 08 caliber srt4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 07:29 PM
  #51  
MapOfTaziFoSho's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-11-08
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
From: The Mogadishu of the Midwest
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
the CSRT4 is about 3100, the SS/TC is about 2900, so a 200 lb difference.
3200 lbs according to my sources...


Having worked for both companies...driven both...Cobalt SS/TC hands down.


...I love how the Germans raped Chrysler...
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 09:02 PM
  #52  
JPizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-28-06
Posts: 5,790
Likes: 2
From: Tampa, fl
Nsrt-4 > Csrt-4
Nsrt-4 > Ss/tc
Ss/tc > Csrt-4
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 07:37 AM
  #53  
EthensCobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-21-06
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Raceland, LA
Originally Posted by billjab
ethan did you race from a roll or dig?
what rpms were you shifting at
a roll......... no-lift shift at 6k
the caliber had intake and a bolt-on muffler
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 07:42 AM
  #54  
BOOSSTED 06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Its hilarious reading these posts, you guys throw around the term WALK way too much. You act like these two cars are horribly different. They arent really that diff power wise. The weight and the looks but looks have nothing to do with a race of course. Its a drivers race, say you will walk or have walked him is just funny.

Second, ROLL "RACING" IS NOT RACING. /rant
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 08:40 AM
  #55  
kazinova's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 05-26-08
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: Twinsburg, OH
Drag "Racing" is not racing...

P.S. In fact, any race where you aren't concerned with an apex isn't really racing. And you need to brake too. Which excludes 50% of NASCAR races as well.

P.P.S. Mad props to Tazi, I'm glad a fellow '09 purchaser hates that people are only concerned with straight line acceleration. I'm in good company.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 08:41 AM
  #56  
BOOSSTED 06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by kazinova
Drag "Racing" is not racing...
See Im pretty sure you dont see a pro roll racing series, so your just being an ass now.

Learn how to launch your car or learn how to road race or auto cross. Then tell us what your racing. And I dont very well see SOLO or SCCA events for roll racing.

Ill take an auto cross or road race any day over drag, but at least you have a standard start and it takes some skill to get your car off the line efficiently in a drag race. Not HONK, HONK, HONK, Mash the pedal. Doesnt take much to get that done
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 08:45 AM
  #57  
lewisb13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-07
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
From: Home: Utica, MI Current Location: Mobile, Alabama
Originally Posted by PimpLay2
ss/tc.... drivers race tho... but if u put 2 highly skilled drivers in each car the T/C would win... caliber weighs alot but they come with like a stage 2 turbo all ready so they still have some getty up
The caliber does not "weigh" a lot. Curb weight is like 300lbs more. And the caliber has an extra 80hp to more than make up for that.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 09:34 AM
  #58  
MapOfTaziFoSho's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-11-08
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
From: The Mogadishu of the Midwest
Originally Posted by kazinova
Drag "Racing" is not racing...

P.S. In fact, any race where you aren't concerned with an apex isn't really racing. And you need to brake too. Which excludes 50% of NASCAR races as well.

P.P.S. Mad props to Tazi, I'm glad a fellow '09 purchaser hates that people are only concerned with straight line acceleration. I'm in good company.

Cheers!
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 09:56 AM
  #59  
Darcy's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-04-08
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: St. Albert, Canada
Originally Posted by lewisb13
The caliber does not "weigh" a lot. Curb weight is like 300lbs more. And the caliber has an extra 80hp to more than make up for that.
80?!?! Nice random number how about 25 horse and a whopping 5 torque.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #60  
MapOfTaziFoSho's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-11-08
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
From: The Mogadishu of the Midwest
Originally Posted by Darcy
80?!?! Nice random number how about 25 horse and a whopping 5 torque.

And if I wanted a minivan on roids I would've gotten a MS3.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #61  
FiscalFizz's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 07-23-08
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
From: East Lansing(MSU COUNTRY)
Originally Posted by kazinova
Drag "Racing" is not racing...

P.S. In fact, any race where you aren't concerned with an apex isn't really racing. And you need to brake too. Which excludes 50% of NASCAR races as well.

P.P.S. Mad props to Tazi, I'm glad a fellow '09 purchaser hates that people are only concerned with straight line acceleration. I'm in good company.
hrmmm.. where is your source for this bold statement?

Are we all supposed to just trust you.. because to me, sounds like YOUR opinion...not fact?

Is there some source I can go to that will backup what you just said.... if not.. then yeah...........
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 10:25 AM
  #62  
Darcy's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-04-08
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: St. Albert, Canada
Originally Posted by kazinova
Drag "Racing" is not racing...

P.S. In fact, any race where you aren't concerned with an apex isn't really racing. And you need to brake too. Which excludes 50% of NASCAR races as well.

P.P.S. Mad props to Tazi, I'm glad a fellow '09 purchaser hates that people are only concerned with straight line acceleration. I'm in good company.
lol at drag racing not being racing. Just because you dont enjoy something dosent make it a waste of time.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 10:34 AM
  #63  
TrevMo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-18-08
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, IL
Originally Posted by Darcy
lol at drag racing not being racing. Just because you dont enjoy something dosent make it a waste of time.
Just as they are criticizing people for only being concerned with straight line speed, they are only concerned with anything but straight line speed. I think both are important...and for anyone who does not think Nascar is racing...I'm sure you would feel differently once you hit 215 MPH on an oval...
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 10:36 AM
  #64  
firemanfrank's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-07
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by billjab
how would this turn out? lets hear some thoughts
Car & Driver

08 Cobalt SS
Weight: 2960lbs
0-to-60: 5.7 seconds
1/4 mile: 14.2 seconds


08 CSRT4
Weight: 3233
0-to-60: 5.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 14.4 seconds


The CSRT4 makes +25hp and +5 lb. feet/torque over the SS/T, but it also weighs 273 lbs. more.

CLOSE ... BUT COBALT SS WINS!
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 10:53 AM
  #65  
SS4EVER's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-08
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit, Mi
Originally Posted by JPizzle
Nsrt-4 > Csrt-4
Nsrt-4 > Ss/tc
Ss/tc > Csrt-4
I liked your comparison there! Yeah Nsrt-4 when modded are just crazy fast... But the rest of the car over-all doesn't compare to the Cobalt SS. But it just depends on what you're looking for. If you want crazy fast for a FWD car then the Neon SRT-4 is your car, if you don't care about anything but speed.

Originally Posted by kazinova
Drag "Racing" is not racing...

P.S. In fact, any race where you aren't concerned with an apex isn't really racing. And you need to brake too. Which excludes 50% of NASCAR races as well.

P.P.S. Mad props to Tazi, I'm glad a fellow '09 purchaser hates that people are only concerned with straight line acceleration. I'm in good company.
Originally Posted by BOOSSTED 06
See Im pretty sure you dont see a pro roll racing series, so your just being an ass now.

Learn how to launch your car or learn how to road race or auto cross. Then tell us what your racing. And I dont very well see SOLO or SCCA events for roll racing.

Ill take an auto cross or road race any day over drag, but at least you have a standard start and it takes some skill to get your car off the line efficiently in a drag race. Not HONK, HONK, HONK, Mash the pedal. Doesnt take much to get that done
I'm with you guys, I hate how cars are only judged by how fast they can go in a straight line... I do autocross, and did a couple track days, and I've posted quicker lap times then some cars that had twice the HP I did and I'm completely stock... Take it to a track, a real track and see how fast that Caliber or Neon SRT-4 will go... or any other car will go...

Originally Posted by firemanfrank
Car & Driver

08 Cobalt SS
Weight: 2960lbs
0-to-60: 5.7 seconds
1/4 mile: 14.2 seconds


08 CSRT4
Weight: 3233
0-to-60: 5.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 14.4 seconds


The CSRT4 has 25hp more, but it also weighs 273lbs. more than the Balt SS/T.

CLOSE ... BUT COBALT SS WINS!
Yeah, like most of us are saying it's going to be a drivers race. If I was you I'd not only race from a roll, but I'd do a couple from a dig. Fare is fare.

And again it's personal preference, 1BADASSS/SC, who used to have a Cobalt SS/SC likes his CSRT-4. And that's his personal preference, which he's entitled to and he can have whatever he wants, and as long as we're all happy with the cars we have that's all that matters.

Obviously modded SRT-4's are notorious for being crazy fast, but now that GM finally got smart and offered a turbocharged powerplant for the SS when they both start doing heavy mods the gap will be real small now... Now it's a different story with the Cobalt SS/TC...
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 12:18 PM
  #66  
malachii's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-27-08
Posts: 126
Likes: 2
From: Toronto
Considering that in another thread I posted the 5-60 times for the Cobalt SS TC as 6.1 and 6.2 (from magazines), then I don't see why you state that from a street start the CSRT4 would win, when your numbers are 6.7. As most are stating, it's a driver's race with a slight edge to the SS/TC.

Mal.


Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
O really?



On the dyno the Caliber proved it's got the power. We measured 281 hp and 261 lb-ft of torque — numbers that pretty much establish it as underrated from the factory.



http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...cleId=122859#8

Mustang GT vs CSRT4

Standing ź mile………………13.8 sec @ 102 mph
110mph………………16.5 sec
120mph………………20.1 sec
130mph………………26.1 sec
Street start 5-60………5.9 sec

On a SRT-4 Caliber they tested, it preformed the following.
Standing ź mile………………14.4 sec @ 103 mph
110mph………………16.8 sec
120mph………………20.0 sec
130mph………………26.2 sec
Street start 5-60………6.7 sec

CSRT4 trapped higher than the GT. Roll race, you will lose. From a dig, it will be close. Most run low 14's stock. One guy is running ~300 Hp to the wheels from an exhaust and drop in filter only.

Its got a big turbo, bigger than the SS/TC. You better be careful.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 12:33 PM
  #67  
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-16-05
Posts: 13,306
Likes: 0
From: UNDER YOUR BED
Originally Posted by lewisb13
The caliber does not "weigh" a lot. Curb weight is like 300lbs more. And the caliber has an extra 80hp to more than make up for that.

its 200....

I have the title:

CSRT4: 3100 lbs and some change
SS/SC: 2900 lbs and some change



Im pretty sure the SS/TC weighs about the same as the SS/SC.

Originally Posted by malachii
Considering that in another thread I posted the 5-60 times for the Cobalt SS TC as 6.1 and 6.2 (from magazines), then I don't see why you state that from a street start the CSRT4 would win, when your numbers are 6.7. As most are stating, it's a driver's race with a slight edge to the SS/TC.

Mal.
CSRT4 pulls hard in the top end. One of its primary sweet spots starts at 60-65 mph in 3rd. I agree though, drivers race by far.

Last edited by 1BADSS/SC; Aug 14, 2008 at 12:37 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #68  
MapOfTaziFoSho's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-11-08
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
From: The Mogadishu of the Midwest
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
its 200....

I have the title:

CSRT4: 3100 lbs and some change
SS/SC: 2900 lbs and some change



Im pretty sure the SS/TC weighs about the same as the SS/SC.



CSRT4 pulls hard in the top end. One of its primary sweet spots starts at 60-65 mph in 3rd. I agree though, drivers race by far.

Let's see the difference on a road course.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 12:40 PM
  #69  
Grimlakin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-02-06
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Ok this race happend. Lets stop saying who should win. I want to know WHO DID WIN?
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 12:40 PM
  #70  
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-16-05
Posts: 13,306
Likes: 0
From: UNDER YOUR BED
Originally Posted by MapOfTaziFoSho
Let's see the difference on a road course.
hehe. Yeaaaaa, my brick is far from aero dynamic. Im sure you could lower it to help a little...

Pooey. I like straight line better
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 12:41 PM
  #71  
evilgoat's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 07-18-07
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: florida
is the Neon SRT-4 faster than the new Turbocharged Cobalt SS ? stock for stock obviously
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 12:41 PM
  #72  
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-16-05
Posts: 13,306
Likes: 0
From: UNDER YOUR BED
Originally Posted by Grimlakin
Ok this race happend. Lets stop saying who should win. I want to know WHO DID WIN?
same here. I think OP is MIA...

FTL
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 12:48 PM
  #73  
lewisb13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-07
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
From: Home: Utica, MI Current Location: Mobile, Alabama
Originally Posted by Darcy
80?!?! Nice random number how about 25 horse and a whopping 5 torque.
LSJ
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 12:50 PM
  #74  
MapOfTaziFoSho's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-11-08
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
From: The Mogadishu of the Midwest
Originally Posted by evilgoat
is the Neon SRT-4 faster than the new Turbocharged Cobalt SS ? stock for stock obviously

I think the Cobalt SS/TC is faster...stock v. stock
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 12:59 PM
  #75  
evilgoat's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 07-18-07
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: florida
Thats what i thought
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 AM.