E10 and 0.87 Lambda
So changing the lambda doesn't change the AFR? lol...
Tested out the .83 on the way home.
23psi @ .88 lambda got me ~4.5 seconds from 60-100
23psi @ .83 lambda was 4.7 seconds on the nose 60-100.
This doesn't mean anything one way or another, and I didn't change a thing other then the Lamba value and then adjust the trims for it. The car will vary slightly on the 60-100 times depending on weather and maybe even just the day LOL! So Im going to run it like this for the week taking times and see what the best I can do is on .83.
Tested out the .83 on the way home.
23psi @ .88 lambda got me ~4.5 seconds from 60-100
23psi @ .83 lambda was 4.7 seconds on the nose 60-100.
This doesn't mean anything one way or another, and I didn't change a thing other then the Lamba value and then adjust the trims for it. The car will vary slightly on the 60-100 times depending on weather and maybe even just the day LOL! So Im going to run it like this for the week taking times and see what the best I can do is on .83.
Last edited by BYT*SS*TURBO; Jul 12, 2010 at 05:19 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
So changing the lambda doesn't change the AFR? lol...
Tested out the .83 on the way home.
23psi @ .88 lambda got me ~4.5 seconds from 60-100
23psi @ .83 lambda was 4.7 seconds on the nose 60-100.
This doesn't mean anything one way or another, and I didn't change a thing other then the Lamba value and then adjust the trims for it. The car will vary slightly on the 60-100 times depending on weather and maybe even just the day LOL! So Im going to run it like this for the week taking times and see what the best I can do is on .83.
Tested out the .83 on the way home.
23psi @ .88 lambda got me ~4.5 seconds from 60-100
23psi @ .83 lambda was 4.7 seconds on the nose 60-100.
This doesn't mean anything one way or another, and I didn't change a thing other then the Lamba value and then adjust the trims for it. The car will vary slightly on the 60-100 times depending on weather and maybe even just the day LOL! So Im going to run it like this for the week taking times and see what the best I can do is on .83.
So changing the lambda doesn't change the AFR? lol...
Tested out the .83 on the way home.
23psi @ .88 lambda got me ~4.5 seconds from 60-100
23psi @ .83 lambda was 4.7 seconds on the nose 60-100.
This doesn't mean anything one way or another, and I didn't change a thing other then the Lamba value and then adjust the trims for it. The car will vary slightly on the 60-100 times depending on weather and maybe even just the day LOL! So Im going to run it like this for the week taking times and see what the best I can do is on .83.
Tested out the .83 on the way home.
23psi @ .88 lambda got me ~4.5 seconds from 60-100
23psi @ .83 lambda was 4.7 seconds on the nose 60-100.
This doesn't mean anything one way or another, and I didn't change a thing other then the Lamba value and then adjust the trims for it. The car will vary slightly on the 60-100 times depending on weather and maybe even just the day LOL! So Im going to run it like this for the week taking times and see what the best I can do is on .83.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: 02-09-09
Posts: 4,374
Likes: 5
From: Tejas
Rent me! per hour
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Careful, the ethanol is used to raise octane, more timing is not warranted because there is more ethanol, you'll ping just the same as you would otherwise at the same octane.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: 02-09-09
Posts: 4,374
Likes: 5
From: Tejas
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
meister
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
20
Jul 20, 2006 10:18 PM
