True 0 to 60?
#1
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 01-16-06
Location: tampa FL
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
True 0 to 60?
I have noticed that most car manufacturers give a liberal number for the 0 to 60 times of their vehicles. For instance the SS/SC was rated at 0 to 60 in about 6.5 seconds and then you read about it doing 60 in 6 seconds flat. Will this theory hold true for the SS/TC? If so any estimates for the 0 to 60 times?
#6
the lnf is not unerrated like the lsj was/is. i bet most lnf's will put out about 10-20whp more than a lsj, which is not enough to make too big of a difference. that being said, it will be close with a slight advantage going to the lnf.
#9
Banned
Join Date: 01-12-07
Location: N. Side Chi-Town
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#11
how do you think the added torque will affect it? i believe its going to be rough geting this car to 60 in much under 6 seconds...hell my buddies GTI 1.8t starts hopping like a kangaroo once it hits like 2700 rpm and thats stock with like 173 tq.
#12
Banned
Join Date: 01-12-07
Location: N. Side Chi-Town
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
power band is diffrent...maybe his car gets full trq at 3000rpm
#13
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
GM says "around" 5.7 seconds for the LNF balt... You have to take into consideration, the SS/TC has the no-lift shift, which im sure really helps its 0-60 time
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-05-07
Location: buffalo/ny
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no doubt it's gonna b rough...cobalts r notorious for wheel hopping. but i don't doubt 6 seconds. it's do-able and also if u get some a/m tires and a torque dampner and get new mounts u've eliminated alot of wheel hop. i have a 2.2 and i put a stage 2+ clutch in and i hop ALOT when i launch. alot of it has to do with the driver. someone just going into a car isn't going to know alot about it, like launching, shift spots...etc. alot of it relies on the driver. i had to re-learn how to launch my car and how to just regularly drive it after installing the a/m clutch. also the electronic t/b didn't help either.
#15
Banned
Join Date: 01-12-07
Location: N. Side Chi-Town
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no lift helps on turbo's because they loose boost in-between shifts,where if u power shift a na/supercharged car,u wont loose any boost
#16
yes i never even took that into consideration Super_SS...i guess that goes to show...me...gotta wait til its out...
cobalt_driver, i know where your coming from with teh wheel hop. i have a 2.2 eco fire now and it loved to hop before i got my motor mounts.
cobalt_driver, i know where your coming from with teh wheel hop. i have a 2.2 eco fire now and it loved to hop before i got my motor mounts.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: 01-02-09
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LNF was rated at 5.7 by GM, I've seen as low as 5.4 in a magazine (I believe it was Road and Track). It really depends on the driver more than anything. I find when Edmunds reviews a car, their 0-60 times usually suck compared to R&T.
I never know what my car does 0-60 because the speedometer is too damn slow lol.
I never know what my car does 0-60 because the speedometer is too damn slow lol.
#24
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 10-15-08
Location: florida
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its very hard to use NLS from 1st to 2nd simply because the gear is to short.... or at least if u use the NLS sometime the car wont let you put in second gear.... i did 0-60 when i was stock using COMP mode in 5.4 Sec.
#25
As for 0-60 for the ss/sc GM rated it at 6.1sec to 60 straight outta the box. Some magazines did better or worse than GM's rating. The ss/tc was rated at 5.7sec to 60.