08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion Discuss the 2008 - 2009 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbocharged. On sale since the second quarter of 2008.

True 0 to 60?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2008, 07:49 PM
  #1  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
clicknd's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-16-06
Location: tampa FL
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation True 0 to 60?

I have noticed that most car manufacturers give a liberal number for the 0 to 60 times of their vehicles. For instance the SS/SC was rated at 0 to 60 in about 6.5 seconds and then you read about it doing 60 in 6 seconds flat. Will this theory hold true for the SS/TC? If so any estimates for the 0 to 60 times?
Old 01-21-2008, 07:50 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
07SSCharged248's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-17-06
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all about the driver really...
Old 01-21-2008, 07:50 PM
  #3  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
clicknd's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-16-06
Location: tampa FL
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very true but wat do you think it is capable of?
Old 01-21-2008, 07:54 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-21-06
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
probably about 6.

with a front drive, that's about where a 4 banger hovers... no matter the power level (on a stock car)
Old 01-21-2008, 07:54 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
nich7601's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-24-07
Location: a
Posts: 2,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't hold my breath. A ton of extra torque and HP, and nothing to help it all get to the ground, it's gonna hop/spin like crazy I bet
Old 01-21-2008, 08:08 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
D4u2s0t's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-18-05
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the lnf is not unerrated like the lsj was/is. i bet most lnf's will put out about 10-20whp more than a lsj, which is not enough to make too big of a difference. that being said, it will be close with a slight advantage going to the lnf.
Old 01-21-2008, 08:12 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Super_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-07
Location: N. Side Chi-Town
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
also they dont launch cars when they test 0-60 times..they just release the clutch and go..
Old 01-21-2008, 08:51 PM
  #8  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
clicknd's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-16-06
Location: tampa FL
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok.. so with a launch wat is this car capable of?...
Old 01-21-2008, 09:33 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Super_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-07
Location: N. Side Chi-Town
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by clicknd
Ok.. so with a launch wat is this car capable of?...
i myself have gotten my car to 60 in under 5.2 seconds many times..but like other members said,more power means less traction
Old 01-21-2008, 10:20 PM
  #10  
New Member
 
RForte1189's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-08
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The SS T/C was recorded doing 0-60 in 5.7 seconds.
Old 01-22-2008, 03:38 AM
  #11  
New Member
 
ghostleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-30-07
Location: PA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
the lnf is not unerrated like the lsj was/is. i bet most lnf's will put out about 10-20whp more than a lsj, which is not enough to make too big of a difference. that being said, it will be close with a slight advantage going to the lnf.
how do you think the added torque will affect it? i believe its going to be rough geting this car to 60 in much under 6 seconds...hell my buddies GTI 1.8t starts hopping like a kangaroo once it hits like 2700 rpm and thats stock with like 173 tq.
Old 01-22-2008, 03:41 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Super_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-07
Location: N. Side Chi-Town
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ghostleg
how do you think the added torque will affect it? i believe its going to be rough geting this car to 60 in much under 6 seconds...hell my buddies GTI 1.8t starts hopping like a kangaroo once it hits like 2700 rpm and thats stock with like 173 tq.
power band is diffrent...maybe his car gets full trq at 3000rpm
Old 01-22-2008, 03:46 AM
  #13  
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
 
REIGN SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-06-06
Location: Dayton, O HI O
Posts: 33,169
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
GM says "around" 5.7 seconds for the LNF balt... You have to take into consideration, the SS/TC has the no-lift shift, which im sure really helps its 0-60 time
Old 01-22-2008, 03:47 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
cobalt_driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-05-07
Location: buffalo/ny
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ghostleg
how do you think the added torque will affect it? i believe its going to be rough geting this car to 60 in much under 6 seconds...hell my buddies GTI 1.8t starts hopping like a kangaroo once it hits like 2700 rpm and thats stock with like 173 tq.
no doubt it's gonna b rough...cobalts r notorious for wheel hopping. but i don't doubt 6 seconds. it's do-able and also if u get some a/m tires and a torque dampner and get new mounts u've eliminated alot of wheel hop. i have a 2.2 and i put a stage 2+ clutch in and i hop ALOT when i launch. alot of it has to do with the driver. someone just going into a car isn't going to know alot about it, like launching, shift spots...etc. alot of it relies on the driver. i had to re-learn how to launch my car and how to just regularly drive it after installing the a/m clutch. also the electronic t/b didn't help either.
Old 01-22-2008, 03:52 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
Super_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-07
Location: N. Side Chi-Town
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by REIGN SS
GM says "around" 5.7 seconds for the LNF balt... You have to take into consideration, the SS/TC has the no-lift shift, which im sure really helps its 0-60 time
no lift helps on turbo's because they loose boost in-between shifts,where if u power shift a na/supercharged car,u wont loose any boost
Old 01-22-2008, 03:59 AM
  #16  
New Member
 
ghostleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-30-07
Location: PA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes i never even took that into consideration Super_SS...i guess that goes to show...me...gotta wait til its out...

cobalt_driver, i know where your coming from with teh wheel hop. i have a 2.2 eco fire now and it loved to hop before i got my motor mounts.
Old 01-23-2008, 04:49 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LNF Balt :

G85 : 5.5
Non G85 : 6+
Old 06-30-2009, 05:02 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
jsscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-08-07
Location: USA
Posts: 3,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the 0-60 without using no lift shift on the lnf
Old 06-30-2009, 05:07 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
austinss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-17-09
Location: Dunbar WV
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't remember if it was motortrend or automobile mag. ( I get both) They got 5.8 sec without NLS.
Old 06-30-2009, 05:14 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
OneCOLDBIZL272's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-30-05
Location: WI
Posts: 3,497
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gm says 5.7 sec 0-60 for the ss/sc & ss/tc
Old 06-30-2009, 05:58 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
wantedSS/TC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-25-09
Location: Aston, PA
Posts: 11,759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
LNF Balt :

G85 : 5.5
Non G85 : 6+
that has nothing to do with straight line performance. LSD only helps in turns
Old 06-30-2009, 06:01 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
slowstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-06-08
Location: east coast
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
LNF Balt :

G85 : 5.5
Non G85 : 6+
Damn, that's news to me. I cut a few 2.0 60ft times without LSD. If I had it i'd be getting 1.7 60ft times bone stock!
Old 06-30-2009, 10:12 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Highbeamz's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-09
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LNF was rated at 5.7 by GM, I've seen as low as 5.4 in a magazine (I believe it was Road and Track). It really depends on the driver more than anything. I find when Edmunds reviews a car, their 0-60 times usually suck compared to R&T.

I never know what my car does 0-60 because the speedometer is too damn slow lol.
Old 07-01-2009, 09:12 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
cardelino18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-15-08
Location: florida
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its very hard to use NLS from 1st to 2nd simply because the gear is to short.... or at least if u use the NLS sometime the car wont let you put in second gear.... i did 0-60 when i was stock using COMP mode in 5.4 Sec.
Old 07-01-2009, 09:23 AM
  #25  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by wantedSS/TC
that has nothing to do with straight line performance. LSD only helps in turns
x2 !! LSD is for helping in the twisties .... it has nothing to do with off the line traction, unless you have a more uneven/slicker surface under one tire than the other.

As for 0-60 for the ss/sc GM rated it at 6.1sec to 60 straight outta the box. Some magazines did better or worse than GM's rating. The ss/tc was rated at 5.7sec to 60.


Quick Reply: True 0 to 60?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 PM.