2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

3.5 bar map sensor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 09:03 AM
  #1  
ryansalazan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 08-15-07
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: texas
3.5 bar map sensor

As TX2K13 begins to draw nearer, I have been slowly prepping for it and have come to a question I can't seem to quite figure out. I want to raise boost up to 30 ish maybe a little more, but for some reason we (tuner and I) can't seem to read anything abover 29psi of boost on hptuners. Also I noticed the rpd will say no data sent when boost is risen that high. Will 3.5 bar mapsensors help to correct all of this? I ask because if itll will help with it all for sure then ill buy them, but just saying $150 for 2 sensors that may not even be needed is alot. Thanks.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 09:15 AM
  #2  
Cobe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-11-12
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by ryansalazan
As TX2K13 begins to draw nearer, I have been slowly prepping for it and have come to a question I can't seem to quite figure out. I want to raise boost up to 30 ish maybe a little more, but for some reason we (tuner and I) can't seem to read anything abover 29psi of boost on hptuners. Also I noticed the rpd will say no data sent when boost is risen that high. Will 3.5 bar mapsensors help to correct all of this? I ask because if itll will help with it all for sure then ill buy them, but just saying $150 for 2 sensors that may not even be needed is alot. Thanks.
Are you talking about the 3 bar map senors that CED sells or they come with the GMS1?? I thought they were 3 not 3.5 lol I was also told our stock ones only read up to like 24 or something? I got them when ZZP tuned my car just cause I had a 50 dollar off coupon for giving them my cat lol.. not a bad upgrade for 80 bucks but in for learning.. 30 psi thats wicked man
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 09:33 AM
  #3  
ryansalazan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 08-15-07
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: texas
Ya I already have the 3 bar sensors but for some reason I cant seem to read everythiung over 29psi. So thats why I'm looking into the 3.5 bar senors. lol An we go BIG in Texas so I gotta up boost at least for the weekend! haha
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 10:02 AM
  #4  
Dart_SI's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-15-09
Posts: 7,170
Likes: 2
From: kansas
I've boosted above 30 once or twice. Lol. I use a mechanical boost gauge tho. In for 3.5 bar map info.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 10:14 AM
  #5  
RAIDERNATION 433's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-11-09
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
From: The Desert
Did not know there was 3.5. I know there is A 3 and and 4 bar map
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 10:15 AM
  #6  
jonathan923's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-07-09
Posts: 7,851
Likes: 1
From: Queens, NY
i was going to suggest manual boost controler as well lol
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 10:24 AM
  #7  
brant's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-07-09
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: cambrigde ontario
umm isnt 1bar = 14.5psi.... 3.5 bar u should be able to read no problem, i run 32psi (or ran) on my 58/57 used turbosmart controller and mech boost gauge had no issues?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 10:27 AM
  #8  
Sox-Fan's Avatar
Got Brakes?
Platinum Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 12,643
Likes: 7
From: Mt. Pleasant S.C.
I've never understood the whole 2.5 or 3.0 bar sensor thing anyway. I mean, considering that 1.0 bars = 14.5 pounds per square inch, then why is it that a "2.5 bar" sensor can't accurately measure much more than 23 or 24 psi?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 10:28 AM
  #9  
ryansalazan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 08-15-07
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: texas
I'm still tuning for boost reduction in the lower gears, therefore I do not have a manual boost controller. I wonder if this has anything to do with this situation. I have done 31 psi before however it can do it but you can't read what's going on and then it'll start missfiring at the very peak of boost. They do sell 3.5 map sensors but the are like $70 each. Haha that's why I'm just seeing if anyone had any info on this at all? Ill more than likely end up buying then but just wanted some input first, maybe I can save $140+shipping haha
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 10:30 AM
  #10  
ryansalazan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 08-15-07
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: texas
Originally Posted by Sox-Fan
I've never understood the whole 2.5 or 3.0 bar sensor thing anyway. I mean, considering that 1.0 bars = 14.5 pounds per square inch, then why is it that a "2.5 bar" sensor can't accurately measure much more than 23 or 24 psi?
^ exactly haha I believe it actually boils down to the atmospheric pressure, or sea level as well. I think that plays a role. Which is why it varies in different areas.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 10:32 AM
  #11  
09BlueBaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-09
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 0
From: Davie, Fl
14.5x3=43.5
43.5-14.5=29

14.5 is 1 bar or an atmosphere. You times that by the the resolution of the sensor then subtract the barometric pressure of your location to get the total readable psi

Last edited by 09BlueBaltSS; Feb 14, 2013 at 10:39 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 11:34 AM
  #12  
ryansalazan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 08-15-07
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: texas
^^ bam this guy! Haha genius! Well then that's what's the problem I guess. So then a 3.5 bar would benefit me correct?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 11:59 AM
  #13  
Omiotek's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 07-04-10
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 66
From: Carol Stream, IL
Would but at that rate go to a 4 bar map and rescaleI. Rpd won't ead past 30psi I don't think but I'm not too sure. Never been past 27psi in my cars and the few times with the last one I did I was using a aem boost gauge
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 02:43 PM
  #14  
ryansalazan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 08-15-07
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: texas
A 4 bar is restarted expensive haha it's like $380-400 for the 2 sensors
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 09:40 PM
  #15  
Fastgti69's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-11
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 1
From: Encino,Ca
Originally Posted by 09BlueBaltSS
14.5x3=43.5
43.5-14.5=29

14.5 is 1 bar or an atmosphere. You times that by the the resolution of the sensor then subtract the barometric pressure of your location to get the total readable psi
There you go, someone remembered physics in high school lol.

You always have to account that in the atmosphere generally there is 14.7* psi, or 1 ATM. You subtract that from the total boost you're seeing.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 11:01 PM
  #16  
ryansalazan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 08-15-07
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: texas
Ya^ and since I'm sea level I believe it's 14.7 exactly? Which would make complete sense why we can read anything over 29.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 11:09 PM
  #17  
Sox-Fan's Avatar
Got Brakes?
Platinum Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 12,643
Likes: 7
From: Mt. Pleasant S.C.
I knew the numbers, but not the math of it. I appreciate your having shown it to us, as it makes perfect sense to me now and I don't think I'll ever forget it. It's just common sense.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 11:31 PM
  #18  
cdnite's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-22-10
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: ATL GA
MAP sensor are only accurate up to 80% of there range.

I havent seen a 3 bar but a 4 bar would require a lot of editing tables not available with HPTuners.

If you find a Bosch sensor that has the GSM1 harness PM me a link and I'll send you a adjusted HPT file you can try.

But I'm running 32psi without issue the ECU just goes in to a default/closed loop/speed density mode.

--Christian

Last edited by cdnite; Feb 14, 2013 at 11:45 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2013 | 12:05 AM
  #19  
ryansalazan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 08-15-07
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: texas
This is where I would buy the sensors that are 3.5 bar

Home ť Shop ť Sensors ť Pressure Sensors ť Bosch 3.5 Bar TMap Map Sensor with IAT
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2013 | 01:43 AM
  #20  
Fastgti69's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-11
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 1
From: Encino,Ca
70 bucks for a sensor isnt ******* around. But then again you're pretty much at 600whp salazan. That's not ******* around either lol.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2013 | 10:43 AM
  #21  
ryansalazan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 08-15-07
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: texas
Ya true haha it's like they say pay to play, but sometimes playing is expensive haha
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2013 | 07:24 PM
  #22  
Fastgti69's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-11
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 1
From: Encino,Ca
Originally Posted by ryansalazan
Ya true haha it's like they say pay to play, but sometimes playing is expensive haha
exactly lol, I won't argue with that!
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2013 | 09:38 PM
  #23  
09CobaltSS1's Avatar
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
Most of the bosch sensors have a bit of head room built into them, so even though they are rated for xxbar they can actually register a bit higher than that.

For example, the stock 2.5 bar. Technically they are only rated for just that, 2.5bar (250kpa or 21.7psi). However, as everyone is (or should be by now) aware, the 2.5 bar can actually register up to roughly 2.62bar (262kpa or 23.5psi) when monitoring the low res map.

The same thing holds true for the 3bar sensors. They are obviously rated as 3bar (300kpa or 29psi), however they should be able to register up to roughly 3.22bar (322kpa or 32psi) according to the sensor specs if scaled correctly.

As far as your RPD goes. That thing is absolutely useless for monitoring boost beyond 25psi and even up to that isn't always accurate. If you want an accurate boost monitor, get a mechanical gauge and ditch the rpd imo.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2013 | 06:25 AM
  #24  
silverbullet08's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-12-08
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
I have always been able to read up to about 32psi with the low res on hp. The problem is reading beyond that if there is a boost spike and being put into a limp mode. Your right on the borderline. The rpd does crazy things when it sees over 29psi also.I could build a file with the correct map sensor values but its a matter of testing it to see if there are other tables being scaled in the back ground like on the stg1 file. My guess is it will be fine since you can run the 3bar values on a stock file. If anything I could build the tune on a stg1 file with the 3.5bar values. Which would be the same difference as running 3bar on the stock 2.5 file.

Your car should be about ready up at the shop ryan. Now we need to get the extra injectors set up correctly to support that 30psi before you order new sensors. I would bet 30psi with the correct fueling is going to be pretty nasty on the street. Already is on 25psi.. Your really just starting to make that turbo work. At 30psi its really going to start moving some air.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2013 | 08:43 PM
  #25  
Matt M's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by cdnite
But I'm running 32psi without issue the ECU just goes in to a default/closed loop/speed density mode.

--Christian
That doesn't make sense. If you boost beyond the limit of your MAP sensor, why would the ECM switch to speed density? Speed density uses only MAP and does not use MAF.

On the LNF, it really doesn't matter if you go past the limit of your MAP sensor. On an LSJ, it is important to have accurate MAP readings because the injector flow varies significantly with a change in boost pressure. The ECM needs to know mass air flow and injector flow rate in order to deliver the correct amount of fuel. On the LNF, it is not as important because you have nearly 3000psi fuel pressure. Adding a few more psi to your boost does not significantly alter the injector flow rate. As long as you have an accurate MAF reading, your AFR will not change much because you raised the boost from 29 to 33.

FWIW, I have run up to 45psi boost several times on the dyno, running mostly E85 as well.(with GMS1 sensors) That's where you run into some real challenges based on running out of both fuel pumps, DI injectors, and 5th injector.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03 AM.