2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Anyone have HP Tuners scan log for a AEM intake?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2009 | 11:32 AM
  #301  
Terminator2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by ninja44
I put the AEM on today, couldn't wait til Sunday lol! Install was easy (hell of a lot easier than the Fujita in my LSJ), and everything fits perfect with no fender liner contact. I put on about 100 kms tonight and the car drives very smooth, no hiccups or drivability issues. When I first started the car it had the fast idle to warm up the car and it sounded like Darth Vader in THX lol! I don't have data loggin capability yet so I don't know what the fuel trims are like but the car runs really good.
The fuel trims should be consistantly positive and yes the car drives just fine the idle on mine was rough a few times on cold start up but it is better now that I have the MAF calibration 98% of the way dialed in. It pulls really hard now. A ton better than the stock airbox.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2009 | 02:36 PM
  #302  
yobrigidey's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-08
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Originally Posted by Terminator2
The fuel trims should be consistantly positive and yes the car drives just fine the idle on mine was rough a few times on cold start up but it is better now that I have the MAF calibration 98% of the way dialed in. It pulls really hard now. A ton better than the stock airbox.
Do you have any lb/min #'s of stock airbox vs AEM?
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #303  
revhigh18's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-15-08
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 0
From: Lee's Summit MO
Originally Posted by yobrigidey
Do you have any lb/min #'s of stock airbox vs AEM?
where in the hell have you been you never post in the random talk thread lol
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2009 | 11:26 PM
  #304  
DoMiStIc_RuSh_06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 0
From: New Minas, Nova Scotia, Canada
So is the aem a safe intake to buy....My dejon is sold and i need something else..it is to quiet being stock
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2009 | 11:57 PM
  #305  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by yobrigidey
Do you have any lb/min #'s of stock airbox vs AEM?
I get 32-33# on the stock airbox with K&N drop in.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 12:46 AM
  #306  
Donny Brasco 2's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-02-09
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: NJ
HP Tuners FTW.

NOT.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 01:11 AM
  #307  
09turbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-03-08
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC
I get 32-33# on the stock airbox with K&N drop in.
what does this mean and is it good? lol
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 01:48 AM
  #308  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
It means I am flowing the max the turbo will push through.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 01:49 AM
  #309  
09turbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-03-08
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
with a K&N and stock tune?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 01:53 AM
  #310  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Uh, NO I haven't been on the stock tune since 1400 miles!

Nah, those numbers are tuned... on the stock tune it was about 22-23 lbs/min!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 01:59 AM
  #311  
09turbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-03-08
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC
Uh, NO I haven't been on the stock tune since 1400 miles!

Nah, those numbers are tuned... on the stock tune it was about 22-23 lbs/min!
lol i didnt know which tune you were talking about lol.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 02:01 AM
  #312  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
That was on my current tune... which is version 5-6-7 iunno I change it all the time! lol
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 02:51 AM
  #313  
Tofu's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-11-05
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by yobrigidey
Do you have any lb/min #'s of stock airbox vs AEM?
Not exactly an answer to your question, but with my Injen I was seeing upwards of 34-35 lb/min, stock box was 32-33 lb/min. I believe the AEM has a larger diameter than the Injen however, so based on MAF location and the aforementioned, they could be pretty different.

Originally Posted by Donny Brasco 2
I represent the unbiased, unaffiliated everyman that wants a nice solution for his daily-driven 2009 Cobalt SS/TC sedan.
Originally Posted by Donny Brasco 2
HP Tuners FTW.

NOT.

Nice.

Last edited by Tofu; Jul 19, 2009 at 02:51 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 03:10 PM
  #314  
Terminator2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Donny Brasco 2
HP Tuners FTW.

NOT.
At least I have a properly tuned car. You paid $400 for a canned tune that adds 20 hp yay, and if you add any mods you cannot tune for them and your airloads are so low that added mods wont add much power at all anyway.

Flow is definately up with the AEM intake. I have my MAF tables 99% of the way corrected for it and I see 34 lbs /min at only 5200 rpms and that was only a 1 second pull. I think it will flow a tad more up top maybe 35-36 lbs/min. The stock turbo's max is approx 36 lbs/min.

Last edited by Terminator2; Jul 20, 2009 at 08:44 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 04:28 PM
  #315  
Stamina's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-09-09
Posts: 4,374
Likes: 5
From: Tejas
Originally Posted by Tofu
Not exactly an answer to your question, but with my Injen I was seeing upwards of 34-35 lb/min, stock box was 32-33 lb/min. I believe the AEM has a larger diameter than the Injen however, so based on MAF location and the aforementioned, they could be pretty different.
Originally Posted by Terminator2
Flow is definately up with the AEM intake.I have my MAF tables 99% of the way corrected for it and I see 34 lbs /min at only 5200 rpms and tht was only a 1 second pull. I think it will flow a tad more up top maybe 35-36 lbs/min. The stock turbo's max is approx 36 lbs/min.
Not directed towards you all, but just putting a point out there:

Well, if you think about it... anytime you make the turbo have to "suck" less hard (usually referred to as head or suction head) to get the air in before compressing it, the quicker it'll spool and more it will easily flow. Imagine trying to suck air very quickly through a very long straw and small diameter straw vs a short straw or a wider straw. This means SRIs and larger diameter CAIs are the way to go. That being said though, the MAFs got issues with SRI designs (any heat issues aside). This means that a large diameter CAI is the way to go at this time.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 09:28 PM
  #316  
Terminator2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Stamina
Not directed towards you all, but just putting a point out there:

Well, if you think about it... anytime you make the turbo have to "suck" less hard (usually referred to as head or suction head) to get the air in before compressing it, the quicker it'll spool and more it will easily flow. Imagine trying to suck air very quickly through a very long straw and small diameter straw vs a short straw or a wider straw. This means SRIs and larger diameter CAIs are the way to go. That being said though, the MAFs got issues with SRI designs (any heat issues aside). This means that a large diameter CAI is the way to go at this time.
Agreed. This car runs better with positive fuel trims than it does with negative ones. What impresses me the most is that it is flowing more air now at 5200 then it used to at 6200.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 11:04 PM
  #317  
ninja44's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-01-05
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
I'm gonna meet up with a local member here and he's gonna hook up HPT and scan my car to see what it's doing. I'm going to look at some of the graphs and see what can be done with this car also. I'll have some #'s on Wed or Thurs.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 03:56 AM
  #318  
DoMiStIc_RuSh_06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 0
From: New Minas, Nova Scotia, Canada
hmmm...im thinking about ordering this intake today or tomorrow
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 08:42 AM
  #319  
Terminator2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by ninja44
I'm gonna meet up with a local member here and he's gonna hook up HPT and scan my car to see what it's doing. I'm going to look at some of the graphs and see what can be done with this car also. I'll have some #'s on Wed or Thurs.
LTFT should be +7 to +10 depends on the car honestly.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 08:49 AM
  #320  
ninja44's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-01-05
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Does the +7 - +10 equate to an overly rich condition? I remember you saying that you logged someone else's car with another intake (forgot what) and it was dead on like stock.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 09:05 AM
  #321  
Terminator2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by ninja44
Does the +7 - +10 equate to an overly rich condition? I remember you saying that you logged someone else's car with another intake (forgot what) and it was dead on like stock.
Actually positive fuel trims are the ECMs response to a lean condition. Because of the larger diameter of the AEM intake the MAF sensor sees less of the incoming air molecules than it should. The O2 sensor detects that the A/F is too lean and the ECM reponds by adding more fuel until the O2 sensor sees the proper A/F mixture. The car bogs a lot less then it did with the negative fuel trims caused by Dejons intake even before I retuned the MAF. It may stumble the first time or two when you cold start it until the ECM learns the new fuel trims. After it warms up though it runs great.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 09:18 AM
  #322  
Donny Brasco's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-11-08
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Terminator2
At least I have a properly tuned car. You paid $400 for a canned tune that adds 20 hp yay, and if you add any mods you cannot tune for them and your airloads are so low that added mods wont add much power at all anyway.

Flow is definately up with the AEM intake. I have my MAF tables 99% of the way corrected for it and I see 34 lbs /min at only 5200 rpms and that was only a 1 second pull. I think it will flow a tad more up top maybe 35-36 lbs/min. The stock turbo's max is approx 36 lbs/min.

Your definition of a "properly tuned car" is based on your opinion, which last time I checked was NOT a professional opinion....
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 09:28 AM
  #323  
Terminator2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Donny Brasco
Your definition of a "properly tuned car" is based on your opinion, which last time I checked was NOT a professional opinion....
You dont know me so your ideas are based on pure conjecture and bias not facts. If you read all my posts you might realize that I know what I am talking about.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 09:32 AM
  #324  
SSlobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-22-09
Posts: 5,989
Likes: 7
From: Kathmandu
Originally Posted by Terminator2
You dont know me so your ideas are based on pure conjecture and bias not facts. If you read all my posts you might realize that I know what I am talking about.
If you've been paid to tune someone's car, you're technically a professional.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 10:01 AM
  #325  
ninja44's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-01-05
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by Terminator2
Actually positive fuel trims are the ECMs response to a lean condition. Because of the larger diameter of the AEM intake the MAF sensor sees less of the incoming air molecules than it should. The O2 sensor detects that the A/F is too lean and the ECM reponds by adding more fuel until the O2 sensor sees the proper A/F mixture. The car bogs a lot less then it did with the negative fuel trims caused by Dejons intake even before I retuned the MAF. It may stumble the first time or two when you cold start it until the ECM learns the new fuel trims. After it warms up though it runs great.
Ahhh understood but what I guess I was trying to ask was if the +7 - +10 was adding a lot more fuel than the stock fuel trim? I would assume that the intake would produce a lean condition as the intake is pushing a lot more air and require more fuel. Thanks for the answers
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 PM.