2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Dear Vince at Trifecta

Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:04 AM
  #1  
gdubs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: 01-11-09
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Dear Vince at Trifecta

I Would like E-85 now that gas is an arm and a leg. Plz figure out the puzzle soon so I can put more money into your pocket and less into oil companies.

Thanks,
Geoff
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:04 AM
  #2  
Kyle4236's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-08-09
Posts: 3,111
Likes: 1
From: White Marsh, Maryland
isnt byt working on the same thing right now?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:08 AM
  #3  
gdubs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: 01-11-09
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
I do not know. But I want it so bad
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:35 AM
  #4  
BlackSS185's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-12-09
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: DELAWARE
i didn't think our stock fuel system could support the fuel pressure that is needed for e85 ? idk if that's true or not. plus i thought that was the whole reason zzp did a second fuel rail?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:36 AM
  #5  
drewbroo's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 12-21-08
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
From: TUCSON AZ
With the buick DI E85 injectors this may be possible.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:45 AM
  #6  
BLAZIN07SS's Avatar
I'm too JDM for you
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 06-05-07
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
you realize it works out to be the same right? you use approx 25-30% more fuel with e85
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:46 AM
  #7  
slowbalt84's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-03-09
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
From: Warrenton, MO
Originally Posted by BLAZIN07SS
you realize it works out to be the same right? you use approx 25-30% more fuel with e85
^this.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:47 AM
  #8  
CobaltVenomSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 02-20-07
Posts: 11,675
Likes: 0
From: Tyler,Texas
at least u can say its cheaper LOL
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:47 AM
  #9  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
I've been able to flow enough at 2800 psi to get to about 70% E in colder weather. Any more than that and I pop a low fuel rail pressure CEL, happened last week at 75% E and 40* IAT2's.

Bigger injectors will mean we need larger fuel pumps, or at least one of them me thinks. I tried backing off the midrange load a bit but had the same issues, fully bolted LNF btw. 45% injector DC ftl.

I can do 60% all year long, even in sub zero weather but it isn't any faster than the 1:1 blend (47%).
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:49 AM
  #10  
Ricer's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 07-07-09
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: Petoskey, MI
I get that it works out to be the same.. and I'm not all that smart when it comes to E85 and tunes and all that.. so correct me if i'm wrong.. but if I could run E85, use more fuel, come out to about the same cost overall.. but have more whp/wtq.. I'm not seeing a downside here..
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:53 AM
  #11  
BLAZIN07SS's Avatar
I'm too JDM for you
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 06-05-07
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
Originally Posted by Ricer
I get that it works out to be the same.. and I'm not all that smart when it comes to E85 and tunes and all that.. so correct me if i'm wrong.. but if I could run E85, use more fuel, come out to about the same cost overall.. but have more whp/wtq.. I'm not seeing a downside here..
well the way you are looking at it is the correct way to look at it, not like the OP wanting to "save money on fuel"
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:56 AM
  #12  
MoJoJoSSsc03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-21-10
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
From: central Tx
lol... im listening in as well... my ma has an 08 impala w/ the flex fuel availability, and i wanna know about spending a lil less on the fuel per gallon wise but obtain alot more whp ...please explain
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 11:16 AM
  #13  
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-09-08
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
I am happy to report that I believe we've solved 100% of this puzzle. I'll report in another thread.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 11:21 AM
  #14  
gdubs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: 01-11-09
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by VinceTrifecta
I am happy to report that I believe we've solved 100% of this puzzle. I'll report in another thread.
I would be happy to test for you Vince.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 11:22 AM
  #15  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
After just filling up with some this weekend, you aren't saving much money LOL. It was over $3/gal still. (3.02 to be specific)
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 11:38 AM
  #16  
Fastgti69's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-11
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 1
From: Encino,Ca
Originally Posted by BYT*SS*TURBO
After just filling up with some this weekend, you aren't saving much money LOL. It was over $3/gal still. (3.02 to be specific)
its honestly better than 4.30/gal
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 11:48 AM
  #17  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
$4.30 is crazy, ours is still around $3.50 for 93
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 11:50 AM
  #18  
gdubs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: 01-11-09
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Yea. Up here is 4.29
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 11:57 AM
  #19  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
How much is the E85 up there then?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:00 PM
  #20  
InfraRedline's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-08
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 6
From: Alpharetta, GA
Wow we have it good here apparently, $2.70 for E85 compared to $3.70 for 91
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:01 PM
  #21  
gdubs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: 01-11-09
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
like 2.90 about 2 weeks ago
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:02 PM
  #22  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
Thats crazy that your E is less then ours but gas is so much more lol
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:07 PM
  #23  
r3v07ut10n's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-22-10
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
I wish i could get 94 for 3.50/gal or even 4.30/gal. Canadian in Ottawa. Ultra 94. 139.9 per Litre ( 3.78 x 1.39.9 = 5.29 )
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:12 PM
  #24  
gdubs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: 01-11-09
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by r3v07ut10n
I wish i could get 94 for 3.50/gal or even 4.30/gal. Canadian in Ottawa. Ultra 94. 139.9 per Litre ( 3.78 x 1.39.9 = 5.29 )
I immidiatly wanna hang myself lol
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:17 PM
  #25  
r3v07ut10n's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-22-10
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
Good thing, car holds a small amount of gas and i get decent mileage.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.