EFR 6758 Build and install
Hey guys, I got a stupid question for u guys. If I upgraded my turbo to the EFR, will that make me fail my smog test? I live in CA so it's really strict. I know I'm gonna have to take out my CAI, CATTED downpipe, and Hot side charge pipe so I can pass but if I uprgrade the turbo then will I have to take that out too? If yes then that's way too much work! LOL If that's the case then I"ll be happy with my current set-up at 300hp. LOL Thanks!
Hey guys, I got a stupid question for u guys. If I upgraded my turbo to the EFR, will that make me fail my smog test? I live in CA so it's really strict. I know I'm gonna have to take out my CAI, CATTED downpipe, and Hot side charge pipe so I can pass but if I uprgrade the turbo then will I have to take that out too? If yes then that's way too much work! LOL If that's the case then I"ll be happy with my current set-up at 300hp. LOL Thanks!
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 using CobaltSS
it probably is closer to 350whp on a mustang dyno.
My Trailblazer ss made 440whp on a dynojet with smoothing, and 380whp on a mustang dyno back to back. My regal is putting down 380 on a mustang and it feels like it could take the ss. Regardless, nice numbers with the blend on an efr.
My Trailblazer ss made 440whp on a dynojet with smoothing, and 380whp on a mustang dyno back to back. My regal is putting down 380 on a mustang and it feels like it could take the ss. Regardless, nice numbers with the blend on an efr.
i didnt say 350 exactly, but its proven that their is a significant % difference in dynos. Just stating the facts, i can post my dyno sheets from my tb so you know im not full of ****. I dyno'd 374whp with my efr and e85. im sure i could bump i t up with supporting mods, just throwing it out there, not meant to start a flame war.
This is what happened to a few a 30psi. Great Turbo but at 30psi i still wanted more. So 6262 it was
ULWizSS]ULWizSS EFR 6758 Shaft Play - YouTube EFR 6758 Shaft Play - YouTube
ULWizSS]ULWizSS EFR 6758 Shaft Play - YouTube EFR 6758 Shaft Play - YouTube
it probably is closer to 350whp on a mustang dyno.
My Trailblazer ss made 440whp on a dynojet with smoothing, and 380whp on a mustang dyno back to back. My regal is putting down 380 on a mustang and it feels like it could take the ss. Regardless, nice numbers with the blend on an efr.
My Trailblazer ss made 440whp on a dynojet with smoothing, and 380whp on a mustang dyno back to back. My regal is putting down 380 on a mustang and it feels like it could take the ss. Regardless, nice numbers with the blend on an efr.
i didnt say 350 exactly, but its proven that their is a significant % difference in dynos. Just stating the facts, i can post my dyno sheets from my tb so you know im not full of ****. I dyno'd 374whp with my efr and e85. im sure i could bump i t up with supporting mods, just throwing it out there, not meant to start a flame war.
Honestly though, what I really want to see is how it does at the track and what it traps. I don't car much about the number. We picked up almost 100whp from the 20psi low timing map. This turbo really shines once you turn up boost. It needs more boost but now ULWizSS has me thinking the opposite for longevity.
Oh yea Wert, nice sig LOL
But this dude bashes stupid **** all the time and his posts are so dumb. Dude needs to know wtf is up and its not all about trap speeds in the 1/4 mile. Tell him to get somewhat traction first and then talk.
There is already a how to. Super easy though.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 using CobaltSS
Last edited by Wert842; Aug 8, 2013 at 10:08 PM.
Traction is easy - slicks. I'm not stupid enough to believe though that having a .2 or .3 quicker 60 foot is going to reduce my trap speeds by 9 mph Lol. 3 mph difference in trap speeds is a large amount of change in horsepower.
Either way, there shouldn't be any grinding of the manifold needed nor will you need to remove the manifold at all for that matter. The manifold heat shield can even stay in place as long as you remove the bolt right where the turbo bolts to the manifold, otherwise that bolt will definitely interfere. Another thing to keep an eye out for as well is the length of the turbo oil feed. Mine for whatever stroke of **** luck ended up being about 1.5" too short no matter how I routed it. I ended up having to piece together two -4 fittings and make a 1/4" extension line to make mine fit correctly. Other than that, it wasn't a difficult install in the least..
Here's a pic of the extension. I also coated my turbine housing in a 2000* high temp black enamel because mine was already rusting a looked like absolute crap. It was far more rusty looking that the o2 housing it's bolted to there in the pic just to give you a point of reference. Any future installs of these that I do will 100% get the same treatment.
Like I said, I may have just had **** luck somehow then with my oil line feed. It's obviously fixed now so no worries. I won't say that I wasn't cursing out zzp for a little bit there though.. lol.. As far as the valve cover fitting, that's literally a 5 second removal if done correctly..
Like I said, I may have just had **** luck somehow then with my oil line feed. It's obviously fixed now so no worries. I won't say that I wasn't cursing out zzp for a little bit there though.. lol.. As far as the valve cover fitting, that's literally a 5 second removal if done correctly.. 



