EFR 7064 vs 6758
EFR 7064 vs 6758
I've been reading on here a lot about different turbo upgrades and I'm just curious about how much slower a 7064 would spool? If it would be a lot slower, why not look into one of buying those fancy quick spool valves. In order for the valve to work you would need to buy the .92 AR to get the twin scroll housing though.
This is mostly just paper racing but I was curious if you could get a 7064 to spool in the high 3ks it would carry all the way to almost any redline right?
If I ever did go big turbo it would probably only be the 6758 because I wont want to build the motor, but this kind of stuff is really starting to interest me. If I have something fundamentaly wrong with how Im thinking please feel free to flame me!
This is mostly just paper racing but I was curious if you could get a 7064 to spool in the high 3ks it would carry all the way to almost any redline right?
If I ever did go big turbo it would probably only be the 6758 because I wont want to build the motor, but this kind of stuff is really starting to interest me. If I have something fundamentaly wrong with how Im thinking please feel free to flame me!
It prolly does spool in the mid to high 3s. You would have to source a mani without a wastegate flange or the external wg version is a t4 flange iirc so then you would have to source a t4 mani for that. It can be done but its not an easy option. The 6758 makes plenty of power...550 is what zzp got out of it
It prolly does spool in the mid to high 3s. You would have to source a mani without a wastegate flange or the external wg version is a t4 flange iirc so then you would have to source a t4 mani for that. It can be done but its not an easy option. The 6758 makes plenty of power...550 is what zzp got out of it
Also, I didn't see the 7163, what makes it so much better?
Designed for powerful performance in a compact package, BorgWarner's new EFR-7163 turbocharger achieves up to 550 horsepower while using a small B1 frame size that fits easily into a tight engine bay. Track proven in the IZOD IndyCar Series, an aluminum bearing housing reduces the turbocharger's overall weight by approximately 2 pounds. For fast response, the 63 mm mixed-flow turbine features lightweight Gamma-Ti material and innovative geometry to increase turbine flow capability while providing lower inertia than a conventional radial-flow turbine wheel. To provide the best balance of quick response at low engine speeds with high flow capacity at top engine speeds, BorgWarner engineers optimized the 71 mm (OD) compressor wheel to manage as much flow capacity as a larger conventional wheel. For added flexibility, the turbine housing accommodates either a v-band or T25 inlet connection option for engines using an open manifold or a T4 twin scroll housing for engines using a divided manifold.
Just did a quick search on the 7163. Spools stupid quick due to a new turbine wheel. They tested it on a ms6 and said at any rpms above 2400 they went from full vacuum to 22 psi in 400-500 rpms.
Yea well it's bigger than the 6758 in both exhaust and compressor turbine. It's bigger than the 7064 in the compressor turbine but smaller on the Exhaust side. So more power than both 6758 and 7064 and less lag than 7064. Shouldn't really be noticeable from 7064 to 7163. I'd go with 7163 though. Still want it too!
How much power do you think a front wheel drive car can handle? I make 400whp/400 torque on the 6758 and the tires just spin all the way through 2nd and most of 3rd. I run 235/40 Nitto 555’s.
Are you planning on running slicks year around and just changing them every few hundred miles?
The 6758 just barely fits behind the engine so if the 7064 is any bigger you’re going to have major fitment problems.
Are you planning on running slicks year around and just changing them every few hundred miles?
The 6758 just barely fits behind the engine so if the 7064 is any bigger you’re going to have major fitment problems.
How much power do you think a front wheel drive car can handle? I make 400whp/400 torque on the 6758 and the tires just spin all the way through 2nd and most of 3rd. I run 235/40 Nitto 555s.
Are you planning on running slicks year around and just changing them every few hundred miles?
The 6758 just barely fits behind the engine so if the 7064 is any bigger youre going to have major fitment problems.
Are you planning on running slicks year around and just changing them every few hundred miles?
The 6758 just barely fits behind the engine so if the 7064 is any bigger youre going to have major fitment problems.
How much power do you think a front wheel drive car can handle? I make 400whp/400 torque on the 6758 and the tires just spin all the way through 2nd and most of 3rd. I run 235/40 Nitto 555s.
Are you planning on running slicks year around and just changing them every few hundred miles?
The 6758 just barely fits behind the engine so if the 7064 is any bigger youre going to have major fitment problems.
Are you planning on running slicks year around and just changing them every few hundred miles?
The 6758 just barely fits behind the engine so if the 7064 is any bigger youre going to have major fitment problems.
thank you for wording it this way, I hate when people say "spool by x RPMS" because that's completely dependent on what RPM you start your run at.
They're larger turbos than the ZFR. Best example I can give is the ZFR is like a gt3076 compared to the 7163/7064 which is like a gt35r. Most likely have slightly more lag, but make more power all over the curve.
gotcha, See my thing is the Lag, I cant stand too much Lag and thats why when I swap my K04 out I'm going ZFR like yours, I would like to have minimal spool time and little lag. At what RPM are you fully Spooled?
I have a boost ramp. It's pretty much instant though. Feel like the k04 much more power though.


