Cobalt SS Network

Cobalt SS Network (https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/)
-   2.0L LNF Performance Tech (https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l-lnf-performance-tech-153/)
-   -   LNF Throttle Body Swap Testing (https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l-lnf-performance-tech-153/lnf-throttle-body-swap-testing-171566/)

Matt M 05-17-2009 04:01 PM

LNF Throttle Body Swap Testing
 
In our quest for more power out of our 08 SS/T, we decided to try swapping to a larger TB. I didn't expect huge gains based on past experience with forced induction TB sizing, but I was hoping to see a 2-3 HP gain. The TB we chose for the upgrade was the 2.4 LE5 TB. I don't remember the exact sizes right now, but the LE5 TB is 4 or 5 mm larger than the LNF TB. Here is a pic for comparison:
http://sites.commercecreators.com/fo.../lnfle5tbs.bmp
We machined an inatke to match the LE5 TB.
http://sites.commercecreators.com/fo...swapintake.bmp
Current setup on my SS/T includes:
ZZP airbox mod on factory airbox
AEM intake tube
Stock turbo
ZZP upper charge tube
Stock intercooler and lower charge tube
ZZP ported head
ZZP offroad downpipe
ZZP custom catback
ZZP tune

When dyno testing new parts on the LNF, we use an external boost controller to keep the PCM from altering the boost level and skewing the results. After several dyno pulls in the 335-336 whp range using the stock TB, I swapped in the new intake manifold and LE5 TB. The swap was very easy and the car idles smooth and has throttle response not much different than before. Unfortunately, the dyno results were not at all what I was expecting. After 3 pulls, the best number it put down was 323 whp. There are no vacuum/boost leaks. The MAF readings decreased in correlation to the HP loss. Here is the graph:
http://sites.commercecreators.com/fo.../lnftbtest.bmp
While I realize that over-sizing the TB does not offer HP gains in many situations, this is the first time that I have witnessed a significant loss in HP from a swap of this type. I am going to look into this a little further tomorrow. I'm hoping that for some odd reason, the 2.4 TB only opens half way with the same signal that opens the LNF TB 100%. However, I'm not holding my breath, as that seems like a long-shot.

marcusicp 05-17-2009 04:51 PM

Maybe try swapping over everything from the LNF TB to the 2.4 TB?

mkriebs 05-17-2009 05:36 PM

Interesting idea. Definitely staying tuned for more info...

I would imagine more airflow would be a good thing, lol. Hope it gets panned out. Have you thought of trying this on the big turbo balt?

Mazdaboi318 05-17-2009 09:48 PM

400 tq?

Matt M 05-17-2009 09:59 PM


Originally Posted by Mazdaboi318 (Post 3879591)
400 tq?

The highest it put down so far was 411 ft lbs.:)

Mazdaboi318 05-17-2009 10:02 PM

VERY impressive man... wow. i had no idea....

BIGTAG 05-17-2009 11:06 PM


Originally Posted by Matt M (Post 3879636)
The highest it put down so far was 411 ft lbs.:)

thats sweet hopefully as soon as you guys get the head up forsale im gonna be on it like flys on shit:guns:

mkriebs 05-18-2009 12:04 AM

Wait... you are pushing 411 ft lbs from the stock turbo?!?!!?!!??!?!?

Holy smokes.

Mazdaboi318 05-18-2009 01:33 AM

I appreciate what you guys are doing Matt btw....

marcusicp 05-18-2009 01:35 AM


Originally Posted by Mazdaboi318 (Post 3880340)
I appreciate what you guys are doing Matt btw....

x 2!

mkriebs 05-18-2009 01:36 AM

x3!!!!!!!!!!!

ralliartist 05-18-2009 03:15 AM

tq falls off rediculously fast.

steddy2112 05-18-2009 03:19 AM

I have never seen a dynograph where peak HP is made at like...early as fack :lol:

And that is the tune making it spike up and fall so much

boostking 05-18-2009 07:29 AM

looks like the torque is just a boost spike. I am going to go ahead and assume the maps are clamped and your spiking the turbo in to the upper 20's to get that torque. yes/no?

OneCOLDBIZL272 05-18-2009 07:54 AM


Originally Posted by mkriebs (Post 3880117)
Wait... you are pushing 411 ft lbs from the stock turbo?!?!!?!!??!?!?

Holy smokes.

yeah it possible my 09ss/tc is 316hp394.6lbs tqr
all that done to mine is 3" custom intake, 2.5"custom hardened charge pipes hot/cold sides, BIGGER intercooler,3" custom downpipe, solid trans mounts, solid upper motor mount. Custom tune 23lbs of boost.

Terminator2 05-18-2009 09:02 AM


Originally Posted by Matt M (Post 3878454)
In our quest for more power out of our 08 SS/T, we decided to try swapping to a larger TB. I didn't expect huge gains based on past experience with forced induction TB sizing, but I was hoping to see a 2-3 HP gain. The TB we chose for the upgrade was the 2.4 LE5 TB. I don't remember the exact sizes right now, but the LE5 TB is 4 or 5 mm larger than the LNF TB. Here is a pic for comparison:
http://sites.commercecreators.com/fo.../lnfle5tbs.bmp
We machined an inatke to match the LE5 TB.
http://sites.commercecreators.com/fo...swapintake.bmp
Current setup on my SS/T includes:
ZZP airbox mod on factory airbox
AEM intake tube
Stock turbo
ZZP upper charge tube
Stock intercooler and lower charge tube
ZZP ported head
ZZP offroad downpipe
ZZP custom catback
ZZP tune

When dyno testing new parts on the LNF, we use an external boost controller to keep the PCM from altering the boost level and skewing the results. After several dyno pulls in the 335-336 whp range using the stock TB, I swapped in the new intake manifold and LE5 TB. The swap was very easy and the car idles smooth and has throttle response not much different than before. Unfortunately, the dyno results were not at all what I was expecting. After 3 pulls, the best number it put down was 323 whp. There are no vacuum/boost leaks. The MAF readings decreased in correlation to the HP loss. Here is the graph:
http://sites.commercecreators.com/fo.../lnftbtest.bmp
While I realize that over-sizing the TB does not offer HP gains in many situations, this is the first time that I have witnessed a significant loss in HP from a swap of this type. I am going to look into this a little further tomorrow. I'm hoping that for some odd reason, the 2.4 TB only opens half way with the same signal that opens the LNF TB 100%. However, I'm not holding my breath, as that seems like a long-shot.

larger TB will never work properly because the ECM calculates the pressure drop over the diameter of the TB. Changing the diameter skews the readings the ECM gets and it looses power as you all saw. BTF stated this fact a few months ago in a thread about ported throttle bodies and such.


Originally Posted by OneCOLDBIZL272 (Post 3880692)
yeah it possible my 09ss/tc is 316hp394.6lbs tqr
all that done to mine is 3" custom intake, 2.5"custom hardened charge pipes hot/cold sides, BIGGER intercooler,3" custom downpipe, solid trans mounts, solid upper motor mount. Custom tune 23lbs of boost.

And no one believes that I am pushing 345 whp 375 wtrq. Glad there are others with similar numbers, and more torque too. :twothumbs

Matt M 05-18-2009 01:05 PM


Originally Posted by steddy2112 (Post 3880494)
I have never seen a dynograph where peak HP is made at like...early as fack :lol:

And that is the tune making it spike up and fall so much

Most people think that tunes are making the boost spike on these cars, which is not what happens. The actual problem is that exhaust pressures get too high for the wastegate to control boost consistently. Exhaust just pushes past the gate and boost falls off. If you roll up to 5000 RPM real slow and then go WOT, the peak HP number is 10-15 WHP higher.

Having said that, yes boost is over 25psi at the start of the pull, and down to about 17 by the end of the pull.


Originally Posted by Terminator2 (Post 3880786)
larger TB will never work properly because the ECM calculates the pressure drop over the diameter of the TB. Changing the diameter skews the readings the ECM gets and it looses power as you all saw.

The PCM does in fact compare the pressure readings, but what are you claiming to be the reason for the HP loss? Are you saying that the ECM closes the throttle until the pressure drop is where it would like? And if so, why would there be a loss of power instead of the same power?

revhigh18 05-18-2009 01:17 PM

how hard was it to get the head off for porting lol

PimpLay2 05-18-2009 01:23 PM

i might have to drive to MI to get my head ported :)

Terminator2 05-18-2009 04:12 PM


Originally Posted by steddy2112 (Post 3880494)
I have never seen a dynograph where peak HP is made at like...early as fack :lol:

And that is the tune making it spike up and fall so much

That was about 70 mph in third gear which is over 4K rpms. Right where my torque peaks too. Most peoples pulls start at 2-3K not 4k.


Originally Posted by Matt M (Post 3881705)
Most people think that tunes are making the boost spike on these cars, which is not what happens. The actual problem is that exhaust pressures get too high for the wastegate to control boost consistently. Exhaust just pushes past the gate and boost falls off. If you roll up to 5000 RPM real slow and then go WOT, the peak HP number is 10-15 WHP higher.

Having said that, yes boost is over 25psi at the start of the pull, and down to about 17 by the end of the pull.


The PCM does in fact compare the pressure readings, but what are you claiming to be the reason for the HP loss? Are you saying that the ECM closes the throttle until the pressure drop is where it would like? And if so, why would there be a loss of power instead of the same power?

You got it. Because the diameter is changed you are in effect fooling the ECM into thinking it has reached it target pressure drop when it has not. I think the bigger throttle body is tricking the ECM into thinking it has reached the point sooner so less power. IIRC it is kinda like the DALs when you mod it reaches the target airload sooner with less boost pressure needed. The air velocity is decreased compared to the stock opening because of the larger surface area an that is skewing readings. I wish I knew more. I would contact Baldturbofreak if you want to know more. He knows what happens exactly when you change the diameter of the throttle body on the LNF. :twothumbs


Originally Posted by revhigh18 (Post 3881787)
how hard was it to get the head off for porting lol

It is a pain.You have to remove the valvecover, cam chains, cams, manifold for the turbo, turbo itself, etc. It is a big job unless, and you are a master mechanic I would not attempt it.

1badBlueberrySC 05-18-2009 04:12 PM

THAT WAS NOT THE STOCK TURBO! CHeck their other thread people... this turbo runs out of breath well before 400ft/lbs

mkriebs 05-18-2009 04:16 PM


Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC (Post 3882536)
THAT WAS NOT THE STOCK TURBO! CHeck their other thread people... this turbo runs out of breath well before 400ft/lbs

To quote the OP:

Current setup on my SS/T includes:
ZZP airbox mod on factory airbox
AEM intake tube
Stock turbo
ZZP upper charge tube
Stock intercooler and lower charge tube
ZZP ported head
ZZP offroad downpipe
ZZP custom catback
ZZP tune

1badBlueberrySC 05-18-2009 04:18 PM

THey are yankin' someone's ding dong... in their other thread...

411ft/lbs was on an upgraded turbo!

mkriebs 05-18-2009 04:19 PM

Thats what I thought... but it also turned much more HP than 323 to the wheels. I asked in my first post, and didnt get an answer.

1badBlueberrySC 05-18-2009 04:21 PM

The turbo cannot support 411ft/lbs...

Just ask Terminator pretty much has max'd it out... at 350whp and 375wtq

I smell somethin.......

Terminator2 05-18-2009 04:21 PM


Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC (Post 3882536)
THAT WAS NOT THE STOCK TURBO! CHeck their other thread people... this turbo runs out of breath well before 400ft/lbs

Actually it was. They took their big turbo that made 400 whp 400 wtrq. They are running a ported head on their car. Heck if my car can make 375 wrtq on the stock head. 400 wtrq is possible on 23-24 psi in the midrange. It just cannot hold the pressure much past 5k when you have the boost set that high. Shaft speed is way to fast at that point. :twothumbs

1badBlueberrySC 05-18-2009 04:22 PM

I didn't see the ported head into this equation....

ls1fbody 05-18-2009 04:23 PM

are they the first to port the LNF head?

what kind of issues does that create with the DI?

Terminator2 05-18-2009 04:24 PM


Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC (Post 3882578)
I didn't see the ported head into this equation....

Read one of the other posts there is someone else who posted in this thread that claims 316 whp 396 wrtq at 23 psi on the stock head. :twothumbs. That is way too much torque for the stock clutch. Anything above 350 wrtq seems to make it slip some. :thumbsdow

Matt M 05-18-2009 04:31 PM


Originally Posted by Terminator2 (Post 3882455)
You got it. Because the diameter is changed you are in effect fooling the ECM into thinking it has reached it target pressure drop when it has not. I think the bigger throttle body is tricking the ECM into thinking it has reached the point sooner so less power. IIRC it is kinda like the DALs when you mod it reaches the target airload sooner with less boost pressure needed. The air velocity is decreased compared to the stock opening because of the larger surface area an that is skewing readings. I wish I knew more. I would contact Baldturbofreak if you want to know more. He knows what happens exactly when you change the diameter of the throttle body on the LNF. :twothumbs

We verified that 100% actual throttle position is what it says. When the PCM closes the throttle a little (or a lot) for various reasons, it shows on the log as doing so. In this case, it maintains 100% throttle throughout the pass. We also regulated the MAP on the intake manifold, but it didn't seem to help, although HP numbers today have been about 6-8 higher than Saturday, so who knows.


Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC (Post 3882568)
The turbo cannot support 411ft/lbs...

Just ask Terminator pretty much has max'd it out... at 350whp and 375wtq

I smell somethin.......

It can and does support 411 ft lbs. If we start the pull earlier, I bet it will make a little more yet. Why are you so quick to dispute everything we say. We are in this to support the community and make these cars fast together. Stop fighting everything we do and say.

Terminator2 05-18-2009 04:35 PM


Originally Posted by Matt M (Post 3882603)
We verified that 100% actual throttle position is what it says. When the PCM closes the throttle a little (or a lot) for various reasons, it shows on the log as doing so. In this case, it maintains 100% throttle throughout the pass. We also regulated the MAP on the intake manifold, but it didn't seem to help, although HP numbers today have been about 6-8 higher than Saturday, so who knows.


It can and does support 411 ft lbs. If we start the pull earlier, I bet it will make a little more yet. Why are you so quick to dispute everything we say. We are in this to support the community and make these cars fast together. Stop fighting everything we do and say.

I guess you are finding out how tempremental the ECM on this car is. When I did my chargepipes the car ran like complete crap for the first 100 miles or so. Drive the car around for a while and see what happens. :twothumbs. It might see gains after it relearns some. 1badblueberrysc had 11* of KR showing with his new IC that went away after a few hundred miles. These things are so funny about mods.

He did not know you are running a ported head on the car. My car would easily be over 400 wtrq with your head on it. :twothumbs. Need money for the install though. I cannot do it myself unfortunately.

1badBlueberrySC 05-18-2009 04:37 PM

I'm not disputing what you said Matt... get your panties out of your butt. I didn't not see the ported head.

Goddamn read what I wrote dude!

mkriebs 05-18-2009 04:38 PM

What Are We Yelling About!?!?!

1badBlueberrySC 05-18-2009 04:39 PM

Who's yelling?

mkriebs 05-18-2009 04:40 PM

Lol... I just hope they can get this panned out. I would be interested to see what this would do on the big turbo balt... should be able to get a few more MAF lbs/min, which would be nice.

revhigh18 05-18-2009 04:59 PM

i want a ported head :(

40rty 05-18-2009 05:00 PM

Interesting!!!

steddy2112 05-18-2009 05:01 PM

Then PM them or buy one.

:lol:

This is a thread about throttle body swapping and how it apparently is failing.

Kudos for trying, but I think I will not go through a headache for 4-5mm...but hey, more vendors should do this.

revhigh18 05-18-2009 05:02 PM

how hard was it to get the head off of this car

PimpLay2 05-18-2009 05:55 PM


Originally Posted by Terminator2 (Post 3882455)
It is a pain.You have to remove the valvecover, cam chains, cams, manifold for the turbo, turbo itself, etc. It is a big job unless, and you are a master mechanic I would not attempt it.

that answer ure question revhigh


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands