2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Max HP & Torque for a Stock LNF?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #1  
agent007kimball's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-08
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
From: East Windsor, NJ & Scranton, PA
Max HP & Torque for a Stock LNF?

I just got my car dyno'd earlier today and put down 250 wtq and 256 whp. It was Mustang Dyno.


The only mod I have is a K&N filter and I use Royal purple 5-w30.


This seems pretty high to me. How underrated are these cars from the factory. Anybody putting down numbers for their stock LNF that are higher?


On a sidenote, it appears that most of you are making more Torque than HP. Seems like I am unusual in that respect.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 01:16 PM
  #2  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
regardless of mods, all stock tune SS/TC are limited to 260hp/260tq by the ecu.

your numbers are very close and every car varies a little. dont obsess about it
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 02:38 PM
  #3  
krispy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-08
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 3
From: Somewhere, MI
not all dynos are accurate

the LNF is 3rd party verified to be what GM rated it per SAE J2723
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 02:46 PM
  #4  
stage2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-28-07
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: canada
most dyno about 240whp
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 02:22 PM
  #5  
revhigh18's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-15-08
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 0
From: Lee's Summit MO
and the ecu cannot detect horsepower nor torque it just limits air flow they try to keep it constant
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #6  
INDColtsFan18's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-23-08
Posts: 2,104
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Bika
regardless of mods, all stock tune SS/TC are limited to 260hp/260tq by the ecu.

your numbers are very close and every car varies a little. dont obsess about it
Thats not a WHP rating though.

He did put down more then the average, usually they are about 245 stock to the wheels.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 03:44 PM
  #7  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
yes its slightly high, but still well within normal. definitely nothing to complain about, regardless of whether it puts out more tq than hp.

the ecu doesnt detect hp or tq, but it uses airflow numbers as an estimation and strives to achieve those airflow #s by adjusting the "output" of the turbo. the ECU can increase airflow as well as decrease to achieve the desired airflow #s.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 10:31 AM
  #8  
IsItFast?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-08
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: Creedmoor, nc
Originally Posted by Bika
yes its slightly high, but still well within normal. definitely nothing to complain about, regardless of whether it puts out more tq than hp.

the ecu doesnt detect hp or tq, but it uses airflow numbers as an estimation and strives to achieve those airflow #s by adjusting the "output" of the turbo. the ECU can increase airflow as well as decrease to achieve the desired airflow #s.
Well not just airflow numbers - temperature, timing, etc are all taken into account to estimate 260 lb ft of torque. It doesn't try to limit HP. BTW most of the dynos I've seen so far are showing the stock trq to be about what this poster got (and what I got, see my sig).
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #9  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by agent007kimball
I just got my car dyno'd earlier today and put down 250 wtq and 256 whp. It was Mustang Dyno.


The only mod I have is a K&N filter and I use Royal purple 5-w30.


This seems pretty high to me. How underrated are these cars from the factory. Anybody putting down numbers for their stock LNF that are higher?


On a sidenote, it appears that most of you are making more Torque than HP. Seems like I am unusual in that respect.
Those are very close to my stock numbers: 253 whp 247 wtrq on a loaded dynocom dyno. These cars are underrated from the factory.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 09:09 AM
  #10  
SSBalt's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-07
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Blandon, PA
That seems about right. My #'s are in my sig. Thats without the k&n btw. Probably lower with it now
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 10:20 AM
  #11  
glhs379's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-08
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville FL.
are these number corrected(sae) or not?

seems a bit higher than average, especially for a mustang dyno, which typically reads a bit lower than a dynojet
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 10:00 PM
  #12  
Chandler's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-03-08
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,TN
Mine was on a DynoDynamics and put down 228hp. These may seem low to anyone else, but to me these number are spot on. Your numbers are fine.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 10:13 PM
  #13  
Black08SSTC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-10-08
Posts: 5,678
Likes: 2
From: North Jersey
I believe those are the exact same numbers i put down, where did you get it dynoed??
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
HEATON
Parts
12
Oct 16, 2015 07:21 PM
TedSS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
26
Oct 10, 2015 04:30 PM
ThoR294
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
4
Oct 4, 2015 08:44 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 AM.