New DP makes 303 whp???
#76
With fuel out of the equation, composites have a lot of advantages.
VV
Last edited by VetteVert; 09-13-2008 at 07:31 PM.
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-30-08
Location: Gainesville FL.
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Composites do have alot of ads, like less heat, they usually can be removed pretty easy and swapped cause they don't have any fluids running thru them.
The ls motors from gm are a very good example of that, you can swap from an ls1 to an ls6/lsx pertty easy.
My z28, you could run it all day long and still lay your hand on the intake and not be burned at all.
The ls motors from gm are a very good example of that, you can swap from an ls1 to an ls6/lsx pertty easy.
My z28, you could run it all day long and still lay your hand on the intake and not be burned at all.
#79
Senior Member
Before you get too high and mighty (not making a cut, just a statement)...you do realize that since only air passes through the intake manifold these days, there are MANY cars that have composite intake manifolds. Look under the hood of GM's finest...the Corvette. Now I'm sure the ZR1 has an alum manifold underneath that supercharger, but probably for a W/W intercooler.
With fuel out of the equation, composites have a lot of advantages.
VV
With fuel out of the equation, composites have a lot of advantages.
VV
#80
Senior Member
Besides being less expensive to manufacturer, the composite manifold had a lot of other advantages such heat transfer characteristics, but from a performance aspect something even more important is that it had much smoother passages. The composite design also allowed the runners to be shaped to a more optimal design than could be done cost effectively on a cast manifold. He ended up letting the PT community know that in internal testing they were seeing 10-15 hp increases just from switching out the older, more restrictive cast manifold to the plastic unit (the SRT-4 manifold already flows pretty well despite being cast due to the better packaging space provided in the Neon).
A lot of early GM and other manufacturer's designs got a lot of bad press on their composite manifolds due to leaks but that can be attributed a lot to things such as bi-metal engine construction (i.e. different expansion rates from iron blocks and aluminum heads), poor flange design, and bad gaskets (which for GM was an issue when the DEXCOOL sludge-o-death started eating the gasket material). Properly designed there is no reliability concerns with newer composite manifolds on a forced induction application. Then again for a simple design like the one on the LNF that also has to support the weight of the electronic throttle body, a cast unit may work just as well and have its own advantages.
#81
The Csrt4 m,akes 285 hp, so it's more like a 30bhp gain, no whlhp.
Also, the SS\TC Cpe is 2950lbs and the CSRT4 is 3190. 240 lbs difference.
The SS\TC Sedan is also 65 lbs heavier than the coupe.
Also, the SS\TC Cpe is 2950lbs and the CSRT4 is 3190. 240 lbs difference.
The SS\TC Sedan is also 65 lbs heavier than the coupe.
Last edited by SportredSS; 09-14-2008 at 11:38 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#82
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ur cars ******* stock i will race u right now for 100bucks. i will ******* pull that ****. ur car looks like ****. and horrible numbers for a 285hp/260tq 0-60 6.2 and 1/4 mile 14.6. my car stock could pull urs with those numbers and those numbers are from caliberforums and the offical dodge specs.
#85
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#86
Senior Member
#88
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post