PTE 6057B turbo kit
Hptuners now has over/under boost tables
Stage kit will soon be aval. (3 bars) no need to clamp
Hptuners will have fueling aval this winter!!!!
there is no reason not to start a big turbo build
also honda, subie's etc... make more power because of more rpm. we dont have rpm yet because we dont have fueling and around 7k we may start floating valves so we will also need to upgrade the valve train but once this is done the sky is the limit!!!!!!!
The first hit is below - 415whp (on an AWD no less) at 23 PSI with minimal supporting mods, made 370whp on 19 PSI untuned. So why are some of the LNF guys stuggling so badly to make 400whp on the GT3076r, even the guys with alternate fueling bandaids?
http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-eng...hp-411wtq.html
One thing I don't get is why all these big turbo swaps are not netting more power in general.
You see honda/acuras of similar displacement are getting 400whp on less boost (<25 PSI), not to mention the evo's and STIs, although the STI has 25% displacement on us.
Is this all because of tuning or are we really that limited in terms of head flow/cams???
You see honda/acuras of similar displacement are getting 400whp on less boost (<25 PSI), not to mention the evo's and STIs, although the STI has 25% displacement on us.
Is this all because of tuning or are we really that limited in terms of head flow/cams???
I'm feeling it's the intake manifold/head. There's a vender on here... it might've been ZZP... that was saying that the intake manifold has improvement potential and inferior in some ways to the other Ecotecs.
i have heard someone on this site saying the head was realy restrictive. so custom intake manifold and port job on intake and exuast should be good for some more hp. if we can tune it correctly.
I was thinking of the 3076r on both cars - same turbo, same psi, different power levels. Check google for 3076r horsepower levels and see where we should be @ 20PSI or so - at or well over 400whp
The first hit is below - 415whp (on an AWD no less) at 23 PSI with minimal supporting mods, made 370whp on 19 PSI untuned. So why are some of the LNF guys stuggling so badly to make 400whp on the GT3076r, even the guys with alternate fueling bandaids?
http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-eng...hp-411wtq.html
The first hit is below - 415whp (on an AWD no less) at 23 PSI with minimal supporting mods, made 370whp on 19 PSI untuned. So why are some of the LNF guys stuggling so badly to make 400whp on the GT3076r, even the guys with alternate fueling bandaids?
http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-eng...hp-411wtq.html
my point is our 2.0L < other 2.0L PSI for PSI on the same turbo, but why?
I understand that, but why does it take our two liter 25 psi on the same turbo to make nearly 400whp when it takes much less on another two liter. If we didn't have the fuel, we wouldn't make the power period. when you're fueling system can't keep up, you cant just up the boost and make more power.
my point is our 2.0L < other 2.0L PSI for PSI on the same turbo, but why?
my point is our 2.0L < other 2.0L PSI for PSI on the same turbo, but why?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



