Some LNF #'s w/ upgrades
Via the solstice forums:
stock LNF 239whp Hahn BSR tuner only 258whp BSR tuner w/ upgraded intercooler 268whp. All on stock intake and stock exhaust. http://www.solsticeforum.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=38345 Dyno http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k2...ntercooler.jpg |
ok the fact they had smoothing at 5 and did a run w/ shifts is just retarded.
NTM does anybody even know what ECU the 'balt will have? if it's the same then the "bsr tuner" may be compatible (barring dif OSs), if it's dif then this whole thread is (likely) moot. |
Either way, with the Cobey being turbo, I believe that there will be some pretty decent potential involved, ESPECIALLY if GM made adjustments to the drivetrain to correct some issues that were had such as the tapered axles.
I think this is good news, the turbo Cobalt part of it that is. lol |
Originally Posted by bc3tech
(Post 1617389)
ok the fact they had smoothing at 5 and did a run w/ shifts is just retarded.
NTM does anybody even know what ECU the 'balt will have? if it's the same then the "bsr tuner" may be compatible (barring dif OSs), if it's dif then this whole thread is (likely) moot. It's the same ECU as the Solstice GXP; https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/08-10-ss-turbocharged-general-discussion-152/2-0l-lnf-ss-turbocharged-frequently-asked-questions-%5Bread-me%5D-82531/ |
those solstice guy's BEAT there cars... here's a SKY RL with 275 RWHP 305 RWTQ STOCK jus retuned to 23 psi...
http://www.*******.com/forums/sky-di...nds-boost.html ^put in redlineforums post #16 |
Originally Posted by thedubsack85
(Post 1618065)
those solstice guy's BEAT there cars... here's a SKY RL with 275 RWHP 305 RWTQ STOCK jus retuned to 23 psi...
http://www.*******.com/forums/sky-di...nds-boost.html ^put in redlineforums post #16 |
Originally Posted by Spectral
(Post 1618598)
lmao that is not going to be good. atleast what im getting from all the info i have read that if you turn the boost up your going to screw your turbo in the long run because it is too small. if you want to push higher PSI you need to swap turbos.
|
those numbers are okjay...we got some ss/sc pushing 280-290whp
|
Originally Posted by Jimmys2007CobaltSS/C
(Post 1618636)
those numbers are okjay...we got some ss/sc pushing 280-290whp
|
Originally Posted by Area47
(Post 1618656)
ding ding!
|
Originally Posted by M-Dub
(Post 1618749)
yes that'd be you
|
Originally Posted by Jimmys2007CobaltSS/C
(Post 1618636)
those numbers are okjay...we got some ss/sc pushing 280-290whp
Go back and look at the ss/sc # from 2005, early 2006 we weren't in the 280-290 range. |
Originally Posted by 1gmfanatik
(Post 1617410)
Either way, with the Cobey being turbo, I believe that there will be some pretty decent potential involved, ESPECIALLY if GM made adjustments to the drivetrain to correct some issues that were had such as the tapered axles.
I think this is good news, the turbo Cobalt part of it that is. lol I believe that the spring rates were changed probably to reduce wheel hop..axles may be the same |
Originally Posted by BLKblurr06
(Post 1618778)
I believe that the spring rates were changed probably to reduce wheel hop..axles may be the same
Originally Posted by SilverSS/SC
(Post 1618804)
the axles for 2008 are new designs . They focused on dampening the harmonics that traveled thru the axles caused by wheel hop . The harmonics is what caused them to crack in the old design .
|
Originally Posted by Jimmys2007CobaltSS/C
(Post 1618636)
those numbers are okjay...we got some ss/sc pushing 280-290whp
|
thats why you swap to a twinscrew..
|
Originally Posted by 3ds138
(Post 1619116)
thats why you swap to a twinscrew..
|
Originally Posted by Jimmys2007CobaltSS/C
(Post 1618636)
those numbers are okjay...we got some ss/sc pushing 280-290whp
|
does this thing come with a front mount. I ouldnt tell in the picture all that well. If it does that seals the deal, tommorow at work ill talk to the sales manager.
|
Originally Posted by REIGN SS
(Post 1618839)
Im going to quote from another thread:
|
Originally Posted by DebadgedBALT77
(Post 1619137)
does this thing come with a front mount. I ouldnt tell in the picture all that well. If it does that seals the deal, tommorow at work ill talk to the sales manager.
|
Originally Posted by thedubsack85
(Post 1619145)
yeah ive NEVER seen the axel's crack. i HAVE granaded a driver side axel at the inner CV (the one that slide's into the hub) i hope they redisgned everything. espically the trans housing.. cause some poeple were cracking tranny housing's BEFORE snapping an axel. and ending up with a voided warrenty for racing.
|
thank god my eyes werent decieving me, A nice frount mount is all really wanted. I wonder what month exxactly these will be hitting the lots. Since I do all the PDI's at work, as soon as we get some Ill get a video and post that up. Better get my finances in order. Tradeing in my 05 2.2L for this would sure be nice.
|
^^ Think April'ish . 2nd quarter is april/may/june . They should have a more specific date by the autoshow season .
OMG .... a sporty car thats being released in the dead of winter ( solstice , 05 vette ect ) |
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
(Post 1619103)
Show me an LSJ running almost 260whp from a tune alone. The guys running those numbers with the LSJ's are running delicate tunes w/ full bolt-ons and meth injection. Not to mention the Cobalt with the LNF will see higher numbers due to less drivetrain loss.
hell i put down over 260 with a 2.8, stock tune, and an intake. how is the drivetrain loss in the lnf cars less than the lsj? |
Originally Posted by Area47
(Post 1621251)
i put down over 260 with a stage 2 pulley, intake and a cat back, and a race gas tune
hell i put down over 260 with a 2.8, stock tune, and an intake. how is the drivetrain loss in the lnf cars less than the lsj? No methanol, no cooling mods! Just Area47's tunes! http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...0/scan0009.jpg |
what about swapping with a srt4 turbo
|
999 for a tuner? Jesus christ. I thought my E55 was expensive to mod
|
Uh, why?
|
Originally Posted by Area47
(Post 1621251)
i put down over 260 with a stage 2 pulley, intake and a cat back, and a race gas tune
hell i put down over 260 with a 2.8, stock tune, and an intake. how is the drivetrain loss in the lnf cars less than the lsj? |
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
(Post 1622304)
I was talking the LNF cobalt will see higher numbers due to less drivetrain loss as opposed to the solstice GXP and sky redline. Considering all the dyno's of the LNF we have so far are from the GXP and RL, the cobalt should spit out numbers a little bit higher.
|
Originally Posted by Area47
(Post 1622426)
irs = sucks a lot of power.
The Sky should see the same 15% for the manual and 18% for the automatic People need to stop sugar coating numbers.. Ohh higher drive train loss. |
Not to mention a bitch to launch, not that FWD is any better.
|
Originally Posted by Area47
(Post 1618656)
ding ding!
|
for the ding ding guys...you realize these lnf balts with TBE's and a tune are gonna be walking all over the 2.5" pullied cars with cooling mods, the works. Don't kid yourselves into thinking it is not a worthy upgrade. "oh the turbo is so small stock, you can't up the boost that much!"
do you guys realize how much power is on the table for the aftermarket with pretty much any production turbo car without even touching the stock boost level. I dono how the turbo is set up on the lnf, but the good old up/down pipe combo's (no cats) with a catless setup from the turbo back along with a tune will yield you some great gains, throw on that intercooler and watch the 300whp. for fairly cheap. |
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
(Post 1619103)
Show me an LSJ running almost 260whp from a tune alone. The guys running those numbers with the LSJ's are running delicate tunes w/ full bolt-ons and meth injection. Not to mention the Cobalt with the LNF will see higher numbers due to less drivetrain loss.
Originally Posted by Area47
(Post 1621251)
i put down over 260 with a stage 2 pulley, intake and a cat back, and a race gas tune
hell i put down over 260 with a 2.8, stock tune, and an intake. how is the drivetrain loss in the lnf cars less than the lsj? |
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
(Post 1622459)
Not quite. Normal equation on a manual C6 would be 15% for the 6spd and 18% for the 6spd auto. Doesn't eat THAT much.
The Sky should see the same 15% for the manual and 18% for the automatic People need to stop sugar coating numbers.. Ohh higher drive train loss. there is many factors as to why irs sucks more than a solid. moving parts mainly, and rear end size itself. friction loss vis fluid. blah blah blah |
Originally Posted by Area47
(Post 1622511)
the loss from the rear end of an irs is about the same as a 9 inch rear end. the ford 8.8 sucks the least amount of power.
there is many factors as to why irs sucks more than a solid. moving parts mainly, and rear end size itself. friction loss vis fluid. blah blah blah |
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
(Post 1622496)
but how much is that tune??? exactly. a thousand bux.
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
(Post 1622496)
it's not. looks like someons is just making up new rules :lol:
|
So we might be looking at 245whp(ish) due to the slight gain in drivetrain loss from RWD to FWD. I can see these cars at 350whp about a year later.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands