Cobalt SS Network
Page 3 of 4
1
2
3
4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cobalt SS Network (https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/)
-   2.0L LNF Performance Tech (https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l-lnf-performance-tech-153/)
-   -   Some LNF #'s w/ upgrades (https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l-lnf-performance-tech-153/some-lnf-s-w-upgrades-82592/)

sn1p3rw0lf 11-05-2007 05:00 PM
Originally Posted by cakeeater (Post 1626985)
....why does everyone think that turbos are ricey? ever heard of the mustang svo, the buick grand national, the turbo firebird/TA's,
:twothumbs :twothumbs

Great cars (ugh... minus the ford! hehe:lol: )

cakeeater 11-05-2007 05:12 PM
Originally Posted by sn1p3rw0lf (Post 1639082)
:twothumbs :twothumbs

Great cars (ugh... minus the ford! hehe:lol: )
still one of the stronger turbo 4 cylinders to ever hit the market, and it started quite a trend of performance 4 cylinders...i'd say a pretty great car for its time.

OniMirage 11-05-2007 05:33 PM
Originally Posted by Pyros777 (Post 1626842)
I'll admit I jumped the gun on the S/C version, knowing that the turbo wasnt far off. When I try to visualize trading in for the SS T/C though, I just can't bring myself to do it! I love my S/C whine!!
compound charging for the win whiiiiiIIIIIIIINE pshhh whiiiiiiiiiIIIIIIIIIIINE pshhh

Scythe_Snake 11-05-2007 05:46 PM
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z (Post 1619103)
Show me an LSJ running almost 260whp from a tune alone. The guys running those numbers with the LSJ's are running delicate tunes w/ full bolt-ons and meth injection. Not to mention the Cobalt with the LNF will see higher numbers due to less drivetrain loss.
I thought ralliartist was running in the 13's on a stock LSJ (part wise) just with driver mods and tunes, and maybe traction mods?

Originally Posted by brentil (Post 1627177)
Not yet, people are still trying to get the tuning and mods down right. The Hahn Stage IV base Solstice is in the 11s though with a bolt on Turbo kit, so I'm pretty sure we can do 12s once we get everything down with the engine.
That's also a 2.4L solstice (LE5?). Not a LNF engine. The 2.4L I wouldn't doubt would be much easier to get into those numbers. That car has between 400-500rwhp.

Originally Posted by JCswoosher2 (Post 1625264)
In all the LNF will be better. We all know it. We probably just wont admit that we jumped the gun on the SC version. But for myself. I would rather have a SC car than a TC. But power wise, get ready SC's
I didn't jump the gun. I wanted the LSJ more than the LNF. :lol:

Brandon97Z 11-05-2007 07:34 PM
Originally Posted by Scythe_Snake (Post 1639216)
That's also a 2.4L solstice (LE5?). Not a LNF engine. The 2.4L I wouldn't doubt would be much easier to get into those numbers. That car has between 400-500rwhp.
Yeah that was a 2.4l but its NA from the factory, LNF being turbo from the factory would make one think it would have stronger internals. But yeah the hahn 2.4 stage 4 had 390whp the last i saw.

shabodah 11-05-2007 07:50 PM
There are Solstices in the 9's, but they aren't running I4's, lol.

SilverSS/SC 11-05-2007 09:13 PM
Originally Posted by sn1p3rw0lf (Post 1639082)
:twothumbs :twothumbs

Great cars (ugh... minus the ford! hehe:lol: )
I take it youve never seen what the lil turbo 2.3's can do , lol ....especially when their in a light notch . The original 84-86 SVO's are badass :twothumbs

SpecialK 11-05-2007 10:37 PM
Originally Posted by SilverSS/SC (Post 1639874)
I take it youve never seen what the lil turbo 2.3's can do , lol ....especially when their in a light notch . The original 84-86 SVO's are badass :twothumbs
As long as they have at least a boost controller. ;) In stock form they were pathetic.

SilverSS/SC 11-05-2007 10:40 PM
Originally Posted by SpecialK (Post 1640150)
As long as they have at least a boost controller. ;) In stock form they were pathetic.
The 2.3's I was refering to are faaaar from stock , hehehe .

cakeeater 11-06-2007 11:31 AM
Originally Posted by SpecialK (Post 1640150)
As long as they have at least a boost controller. ;) In stock form they were pathetic.
pathetic compared to what? they would smoke any of the competition on the road course EASILY.

1gmfanatik 11-06-2007 01:42 PM
*cough* GM RULEZ!! *cough* :lol:

I uh, meant GM....fanatik, as in me..That's my story and I'm stickin to it

07cobaltss 11-06-2007 01:59 PM
i personaly not a fan of numbers and not getting to drive it/see it myself. until then i'm not a fan.

cakeeater 11-06-2007 03:59 PM
Originally Posted by 1gmfanatik (Post 1641621)
*cough* GM RULEZ!! *cough* :lol:

I uh, meant GM....fanatik, as in me..That's my story and I'm stickin to it
mmmm i'd like to put an sho against a same gen trans am on a road course.... svo = 40 trillion miles out in front.

1gmfanatik 11-06-2007 04:06 PM
Originally Posted by cakeeater (Post 1641972)
mmmm i'd like to put an sho against a same gen trans am on a road course.... svo = 40 trillion miles out in front.
Blah Blah Blah...I was just talking about GM in general. Don't get your panties in a bunch. :cssNET:

chevysalesman614 11-07-2007 02:25 PM
gm, is this just more hype, or is this for real? (havent been on here in like 6 weeks)

lewisb13 11-07-2007 05:11 PM
Has anyone heard the numbers as far as what the stock LNF internals are good up to HPwise?

Suaveat69 11-08-2007 10:30 PM
Originally Posted by cakeeater (Post 1641972)
mmmm i'd like to put an sho against a same gen trans am on a road course.... svo = 40 trillion miles out in front.
Do yuo have any times from a road course from say SCAA racing or any other? Are you comparing stock vs. stock or mod vs mod?

KlugSRT-4 11-12-2007 07:00 PM
Originally Posted by blk06ss/sc (Post 1621892)
what about swapping with a srt4 turbo
........ha you can have mine.

R&C_rallySS 12-08-2007 09:08 AM
Originally Posted by XM15 (Post 1618623)
True, but at least the LNF cobalt guys won't have to be the guinea pigs like the LSJ guys are. They can look and see what works and doesn't work from the RL and GXP owners.
Its never good being a guinea pig, thats why I wish I would of went back to my old root of 60s muscle cars...

SpecialK 12-23-2007 11:47 PM
Originally Posted by cakeeater (Post 1641312)
pathetic compared to what? they would smoke any of the competition on the road course EASILY.

Compared to a moped. :lol: And as far as a road course is concerned they were some of the lightest and best balanced stangs around yes. But one bad move on a drivers part adn they lost all their momentum.

stage2 03-09-2008 04:47 PM
i would go and buy ss/tc but after putting 3,000$ mods in my car....not sure that i wanna go and buy this now

Archie 03-09-2008 11:32 PM
Originally Posted by lewisb13 (Post 1645787)
Has anyone heard the numbers as far as what the stock LNF internals are good up to HPwise?
So far, it has made 330hp and 425ft/lbs with just a tune by GM.:guns:

cakeeater 03-10-2008 02:11 AM
Originally Posted by Archie (Post 2056349)
So far, it has made 330hp and 425ft/lbs with just a tune by GM.:guns:
just a tune? i doubt that very much.

hatrickstu 03-10-2008 02:13 AM
Originally Posted by cakeeater (Post 2056764)
just a tune? i doubt that very much.
tune and 3 inch catless. its on their site

EtyrnuSS 03-10-2008 02:41 AM
Originally Posted by BULLETSSMOKE (Post 1625684)
They should've kept the SC, its just American and non-rice (IMO!!!) for a American car to have its power from a fat V8 or a whiny ass supercharger tearin up the streets.
Well, you can blame our "wonderful" enviromentalist hippie I-want-to-tell-you-how-to-live asshats and congress for the demise of supercharged production cars. ZR1 excepted of course;).

On topic, its cool. If I didn't already have the SC, I would be looking at one of these.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 AM.
Page 3 of 4
1
2
3
4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands