2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Turbo guru's explain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2008, 12:41 AM
  #1  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
MR.Pizza's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-08
Location: Michigan
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbo guru's explain



I believe this is telling me that our turbos are about at their max as it is.
Old 08-18-2008, 06:35 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
BostonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-20-07
Location: boston
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MR.Pizza


I believe this is telling me that our turbos are about at their max as it is.
nice picture, what is it?
Old 08-18-2008, 06:37 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Blackout06LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-17-06
Location: Ft. Eustis, VA
Posts: 7,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is a turbo flow chart, but why did you post? Geez.

I'll go to google.com to see if I can find out the flow chart formula again. Along with PMing this to Blake. He is good with flow charts.

It's been awhile since I've even looked at the formula. But you take in a lot of factors to figure out the turbo flow, etc. Which actually did this for a SS/TC not long ago. Let me send a few PMs to the guys who were mostly discussing it as they are not online.
Old 08-18-2008, 08:50 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Red2.4SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-06
Location: SK
Posts: 16,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe that it is running clost to peak on the OEM turbo.

This is typical as OEM is looking to get as quick of a spool up as possible so the turbo size is usually as small as they can get away with.

I cant tell you much off of just the map alone, I'm not even sure what the max boost pressure is on the SS/TC?
Old 08-18-2008, 08:53 AM
  #5  
Member
 
SSpdDmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-09-08
Location: Farmington, MI
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Red2.4SS
I believe that it is running clost to peak on the OEM turbo.

This is typical as OEM is looking to get as quick of a spool up as possible so the turbo size is usually as small as they can get away with.

I cant tell you much off of just the map alone, I'm not even sure what the max boost pressure is on the SS/TC?
Until they figure out the PCM a little more, I think we're stuck at 22~23psi. After that, the car will go into a limp mode.
Old 08-18-2008, 09:06 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
BostonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-20-07
Location: boston
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blackout06LS
It is a turbo flow chart, but why did you post? Geez.
ME??
Old 08-18-2008, 11:22 AM
  #7  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
MR.Pizza's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-08
Location: Michigan
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blackout06LS
It is a turbo flow chart, but why did you post? Geez.

I'll go to google.com to see if I can find out the flow chart formula again. Along with PMing this to Blake. He is good with flow charts.

It's been awhile since I've even looked at the formula. But you take in a lot of factors to figure out the turbo flow, etc. Which actually did this for a SS/TC not long ago. Let me send a few PMs to the guys who were mostly discussing it as they are not online.
Thanks, yeah this is the SS/TC turbo graph converted using Garretts method. I found it on the Sky/Soltice forum, however they never really discussed it other than to argue about the math.
Originally Posted by Red2.4SS
I believe that it is running clost to peak on the OEM turbo.

This is typical as OEM is looking to get as quick of a spool up as possible so the turbo size is usually as small as they can get away with.

I cant tell you much off of just the map alone, I'm not even sure what the max boost pressure is on the SS/TC?
Well I think the max boost is aprox 20 psi so looking at the graph the K04 is nearly peaked? I see that Borg Warner makes more efficient k04's we could swap in. Sorry if this has already been covered.
Old 08-18-2008, 11:25 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
XenSS06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-10-06
Location: Dracut, MA
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Efficiency chart you want to be as close as possible to middle ring or in it i believe otherwise you out of the zone and heat and other factors get greater.

I dont know though im not a turbo Guru.
Old 08-18-2008, 12:39 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
MARIN007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-22-05
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XenSS06
Efficiency chart you want to be as close as possible to middle ring or in it i believe otherwise you out of the zone and heat and other factors get greater.

I dont know though im not a turbo Guru.

I've never seen more than 110 kPa (15.9psi) so looks like it's in the efficient ring always. I'd love to feel 19-21psi though.
Old 08-18-2008, 05:44 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
peachpuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-14-08
Location: around the world
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Who added the hp numbers to that chart? They were not on it originally. If someone can translate the bottom numbers into actual flowrate it would be easier to understand, such as lbs/min or cfm.
Old 08-18-2008, 08:21 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
IsItFast?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-21-08
Location: Creedmoor, nc
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those numbers dont line up with what we are seeing... someone did their math wrong on the HP numbers, and that calls into question the validity of the entire compressor map. However, the PSI units added to the map appear to line up with what we have discovered so far on the upper limits of the turbo - 21-22psi being about the highest safe boost you can run, and looking at the map above this is just at the top of its efficiency curve, while the stock 15 ish psi is dead center of the map. Id like to see the true, unedited version.

Maybe this is it?


Using (P1 + P2) / P2 = Pressure Ratio
P1 = Desired boost pressure in psi
P2 = ambient atmospheric pressure (14.7psi)

We get almost perfectly what whomever calculated the PSI on the left hand side, so appears to be correct.

Our engines are almost 122 CID, so at 100% VE our engines should flow close to 220 CFM. Assuming 80% VE this means approx 176 CFM at 6,250 RPM, which is approx 12 lbs/min at that rpm

Bottom line, the HP part of that map doesnt line up, but I think thats just because whoever added it didnt do the math correctly.
Old 08-19-2008, 02:40 AM
  #12  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
MR.Pizza's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-08
Location: Michigan
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, it was wonder about the HP numbers. They didn't seem to be correct but wasn't sure how to convert it. Anyway you could reconvert those hp numbers correctly?
Old 08-19-2008, 02:51 AM
  #13  
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
 
REIGN SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-06-06
Location: Dayton, O HI O
Posts: 33,169
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
http://www.s4biturbo.com/k04/RS4K04.xls

I found this on a BMW forum, it helps explain how to read a compressor map: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum...d.php?t=258035

Last edited by REIGN SS; 08-19-2008 at 02:51 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 08-19-2008, 03:13 AM
  #14  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
MR.Pizza's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-27-08
Location: Michigan
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks that explains it...
Old 08-19-2008, 06:00 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
IsItFast?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-21-08
Location: Creedmoor, nc
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MR.Pizza
Thanks, it was wonder about the HP numbers. They didn't seem to be correct but wasn't sure how to convert it. Anyway you could reconvert those hp numbers correctly?
Quick calculations (it takes several calculations to calculate a single data point on that map) show our 260hp to be at about the 0.12 mark on the X axis. I believe the X axis is Kg/s, so you can convert to lb/min if you want to by multiplying the numbers by 7. (7 is not the exact number to convert, but it will get you very very close and is easy to remember)

This also assumes many variables that are not listed here such as air temperature, altitude (assuming 14.7 psia for sea level), VE of the engine (does anyone know the VE of the LNF? 80-90%?), etc.

Using assumed variables, and assuming that this chart is the correct one (lots of assumption there), that would seem to indicate that at the very outside edge of the efficiency island is around 22 psig before the compressor will surge - this lines up with both the overboost protection in the computer and what some tuners have run into already. 21 is about the max safe boost level on the stock K04 (which is what Hahn's tuner sets the boost to, so this lines up as well).



Edit - I must be blind. The chart shows the calculation used to achieve nredV using 183.5, which means they are using 83.5% VE for their calculations. Doesn't really change what I wrote though, still close enough.

Last edited by IsItFast?; 08-19-2008 at 09:44 AM.
Old 10-02-2008, 09:26 AM
  #16  
New Member
 
cessblood's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-11-07
Location: MA
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry for bring this thread back to life but I'm going to watch this thread. I'm thinking about getting the new turbo cobalt ss.
Old 10-02-2008, 03:58 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
peachpuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-14-08
Location: around the world
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Turns out the map in the first post is from a different turbo and not the one used in the lnf, here's the real one courtesy of BaldTurboFreak
He's also stuffed a slightly larger wheel in there, he's currently testing that setup.

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Supercharged06SS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
21
12-11-2022 04:47 PM
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
05-28-2022 03:47 AM
dennis69
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
7
10-20-2015 07:39 AM
maliki778
Dyno Results
4
10-01-2015 07:39 PM
metroplex
Appearance
0
09-27-2015 07:48 AM



Quick Reply: Turbo guru's explain



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM.