2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Why do people think the K04 is so small?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2010, 09:49 PM
  #1  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
Boxing Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-02-10
Location: Washington
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why do people think the K04 is so small?

How many stock turbo cars are capable of making well over 300whp?

In reality they are not that small. Not to mention much more power is going to be a hassle in FWD cars.

I come from a 2g DSM with the t-25's. Maybe I'm just being ignorant, but I'm pretty sure cars like the WRX were having problem getting over 300whp with the stock turbo. Even with the 1g DSM's. They have the 14B which is pretty small, but not that small, and it doesn't make 300whp unless you really put work in.
Old 09-02-2010, 09:51 PM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
05Slowline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-10
Location: HBG/Hanover
Posts: 6,919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why? did you ever look at it? lmfao.
Old 09-02-2010, 09:54 PM
  #3  
Member
 
09SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-02-08
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I had an 05 Evo MR before my SS and it was possible to make good numbers from the 16g going through all 4 wheels.
Old 09-02-2010, 09:55 PM
  #4  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
Boxing Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-02-10
Location: Washington
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 09SS
I had an 05 Evo MR before my SS and it was possible to make good numbers from the 16g going through all 4 wheels.
Drivetrain loss is an issue to yes.
Old 09-02-2010, 10:01 PM
  #5  
Member
 
09SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-02-08
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My view is push the stock stuff as far as possible then start changing parts.
Old 09-02-2010, 10:01 PM
  #6  
AWD > FWD
iTrader: (2)
 
TommyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-18-09
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Want me to post a pic of the K04? It's pretty small. A turbo doesn't have to be large to make decent numbers, just efficient.
Old 09-02-2010, 10:04 PM
  #7  
Member
 
09SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-02-08
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Tommyp2010
Want me to post a pic of the K04? It's pretty small. A turbo doesn't have to be large to make decent numbers, just efficient.
Truth and a good tune is key.
Old 09-02-2010, 10:05 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
aweSOMeBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-30-06
Location: Prince Rupert BC Canada
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.
Old 09-03-2010, 06:57 AM
  #9  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
05Slowline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-10
Location: HBG/Hanover
Posts: 6,919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 09SS
I had an 05 Evo MR before my SS and it was possible to make good numbers from the 16g going through all 4 wheels.
yea if you shove 30psi in it lmao
Old 09-03-2010, 07:25 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
JPizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-28-06
Location: Tampa, fl
Posts: 5,790
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes the K04, is a tiny turbo if you ever see it... But it does produce some very good numbers.
Old 09-03-2010, 10:06 AM
  #11  
Member
 
Chandler's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-08
Location: Nashville,TN
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the ol' "size matters" thread.
Old 09-03-2010, 10:41 AM
  #12  
Member
 
Spooled's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-27-09
Location: Front Royal, VA
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I bet the Balt's in Texas have bigger turbos then the ones that arent....

Last edited by Spooled; 09-03-2010 at 11:44 AM.
Old 09-03-2010, 11:41 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by JPizzle
Yes the K04, is a tiny turbo if you ever see it... But it does produce some very good numbers.
For this displacement motor it is a medium sized turbo.
Old 09-03-2010, 03:06 PM
  #14  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
Boxing Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-02-10
Location: Washington
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess everyone see's my point. Efficiency wise, it is not small.
Old 09-03-2010, 03:20 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
mrsilent13's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 6,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but it is small...when ever mine decides to fail...hello gt28...maybe as much as a gt35
Old 09-03-2010, 03:40 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
slowbalt84's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-03-09
Location: Warrenton, MO
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why not just do a GT30? it's more efficienct than the GT28 and has about the same spool. GT35 is too big IMO
Old 09-03-2010, 03:47 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Billig ss/sc's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: Williamstown, NJ
Posts: 13,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^What's a GT2876 good for power-wise? 350-400whp?
Old 09-03-2010, 03:47 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Zdeuce4's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-16-07
Location: S.A
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spooled
I bet the Balt's in Texas have bigger turbos then the ones that arent....
true story
Old 09-03-2010, 03:59 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by slowbalt84
why not just do a GT30? it's more efficienct than the GT28 and has about the same spool. GT35 is too big IMO
There are many different turbos that fit those specs you listed. GT3071 GT3076 GT2871 GT2876 and there are different A/Rs for each turbo as well. A GT3076 with the largest exhaust housing is going to spool at least 1,000 RPMs later than a 2871 with the smallest exhaust housing. A 3071 with the smallest exhaust housing is a good choice for this car as is the GT2871 with the middle or largest exhaust housing ( I cannot remember all the A/Rs LOL)
Old 09-03-2010, 05:28 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
383_Stroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-25-08
Location: Murray, KY
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because its the size of a donut?
Old 09-03-2010, 05:44 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
padlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-20-09
Location: Platteville, WI
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aweSOMeBalt
It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.
^^ this guy should be a pshyciatrist!
Old 09-03-2010, 05:57 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
cubaniche's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-26-09
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,804
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I want to see what comes of that turbo engineer that was on the kappa forums saying he could put gt2871 internals in the K04. Said hes done it for the mazda k04s no prob.....we will see.
Old 09-03-2010, 06:06 PM
  #23  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
05Slowline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-10
Location: HBG/Hanover
Posts: 6,919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Billig ss/sc
^^What's a GT2876 good for power-wise? 350-400whp?
garrett claims up to 480 but i take it that's on a larger motor, def not gonna happen on a 2.0 lulz prob 300 give or take
Old 09-03-2010, 06:19 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
RoadconeTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-10-10
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
because the k04 is a baby turbo...
Old 09-03-2010, 06:24 PM
  #25  
Member
 
09SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-02-08
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 05Slowline
yea if you shove 30psi in it lmao
I don't want to get to sidetracked on this thread but there's a couple of Evo's that make 350 whp or more with bolt on's on 25 psi.


Quick Reply: Why do people think the K04 is so small?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 AM.