2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

ZFR Dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2015, 10:19 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Mercury
I just hit the track to get some ETs.

I am on good year all season tires, i only went to get a MPH (which still isn't good)

My best time is below:
60' ... 2.358
1/8... 9.09
MPH...82.61
1000...11.58

1/4... 13.718
MPH... 106.18

My MPH I know should be closer to 110.

I am hoping to have another tuner look at this soon.
Werts ZFR I tuned traps 121-122 all day on 93 octane. 106 trap is easily done on 91 and stock turbo at 22psi. This Mustang dyno you used seems like it reads close to the same as a dynojet based on your trap speed.
Old 07-01-2015, 10:55 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
Cobalt_Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-19-09
Location: Windsor NS
Posts: 7,705
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
i can hit high 13's at 104mph with gms1 tune on a 2.3 60ft. you should definately be faster unless you are spinning all the way down the track or on a mountain.
Old 07-01-2015, 11:26 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
colodude18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-10
Location: Greater Denver Area, Colorado
Posts: 2,692
Received 171 Likes on 142 Posts
An HPT logged 60-100 run may be a better measure versus a quarter mile. A lot of driver skill goes into the result of the latter...
Old 07-01-2015, 11:29 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
footballplaya3k's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-18-12
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,756
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by colodude18
An HPT logged 60-100 run may be a better measure versus a quarter mile. A lot of driver skill goes into the result of the latter...
The trap is a dead give away something is not right, though.
Old 07-02-2015, 07:39 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mercury's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-05
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 4,194
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cobalt_Daddy
i can hit high 13's at 104mph with gms1 tune on a 2.3 60ft. you should definately be faster unless you are spinning all the way down the track or on a mountain.
I was spinning off the line pretty bad. Keep in mind my car weights 350lbs more than a Cobalt

Originally Posted by colodude18
An HPT logged 60-100 run may be a better measure versus a quarter mile. A lot of driver skill goes into the result of the latter...
I am a pretty well versed driver, but I understand what you are saying. I am going to see if I can get the tune from my tuner and post it on here.
Old 07-02-2015, 09:21 AM
  #56  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,574
Received 836 Likes on 733 Posts
I'd have to go check out my slips, but I'm pretty sure I trapped higher than 106 on the KO4+ at over 5300' altitude

Originally Posted by colodude18
An HPT logged 60-100 run may be a better measure versus a quarter mile. A lot of driver skill goes into the result of the latter...
Trap speed gives a pretty good idea the power level. Time is greatly effected by the 60' but not so much the trap speed.
Old 07-02-2015, 09:25 AM
  #57  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
colodude18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-10
Location: Greater Denver Area, Colorado
Posts: 2,692
Received 171 Likes on 142 Posts
Originally Posted by ECaulk
I'd have to go check out my slips, but I'm pretty sure I trapped higher than 106 on the KO4+ at over 5300' altitude



Trap speed gives a pretty good idea the power level. Time is greatly effected by the 60' but not so much the trap speed.
Are you saying there's hope for me if I go to the Airstrip Attack next year and run the 1/2 mile with Luci?? They only measure trap speed...
Old 07-02-2015, 09:32 AM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by colodude18
Are you saying there's hope for me if I go to the Airstrip Attack next year and run the 1/2 mile with Luci?? They only measure trap speed...
Except your altitude is going to kill your traps in the half by a lot vs sea level 6000ft is high up lol. Good for comparing to other cars running at the event with you though.
Old 07-02-2015, 09:34 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by ECaulk
I'd have to go check out my slips, but I'm pretty sure I trapped higher than 106 on the KO4+ at over 5300' altitude



Trap speed gives a pretty good idea the power level. Time is greatly effected by the 60' but not so much the trap speed.
IIRC your cars previous owner trapped just under 110 with it.
Old 07-02-2015, 02:00 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,574
Received 836 Likes on 733 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
IIRC your cars previous owner trapped just under 110 with it.
Thats what I was recalling for my trap speed, don't have the slips at work though
Old 07-02-2015, 04:20 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
63 Nova SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-12
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,485
Received 316 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by ECaulk
Thats what I was recalling for my trap speed, don't have the slips at work though
My last 2 runs at the strip with the + were 13.56@110 and 13.30@107, but we still have 2ndgear limited a bunch. That was with a 2.32 60ft on street tires. Remember that as your time comes down your mph can drop a little cause you aren't wasting it by spinning. If I ran the times the zfr car ran with that turbo I would park it. Something's wrong.
Old 07-02-2015, 04:43 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
Knightwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-09
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, but as it's already been said, your tuner does not know how to tune this car.. my stock turbo trapped 113mph at 2500', roughly 4000 DA and my Zfr traps 124, same track. As stated before, these are considerably different than your average whatever car.. Bosch needs a different understanding so to speak.
Unless... there's something seriously wrong with your car.
Old 07-02-2015, 04:46 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
Dipped_Cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-23-12
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,215
Received 39 Likes on 37 Posts
yup. this car needs a REAL PROVEN tuner.

he tunned a STOCK car, and you praise him? you are comparing apples to oranges with that statmenet.
Old 07-02-2015, 07:04 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
theamericanautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-23-11
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 1,409
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hate to beat a dead horse but that's definitely a low trap. I trapped almost 107 mph on GMS1, intake and exhaust without even a custom tune and obviously stock turbo.
Old 07-02-2015, 07:11 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mercury's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-05
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 4,194
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I should have the dyno graph with lambda, AFR, and boost soon to help shed some light
Old 07-30-2015, 08:18 PM
  #66  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mercury's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-05
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 4,194
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Still having trouble getting the data from my tuner.

Just a thought, I am running the FORGE BPV on this turbo, could that affect the numbers?
Old 07-30-2015, 09:25 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
colodude18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-10
Location: Greater Denver Area, Colorado
Posts: 2,692
Received 171 Likes on 142 Posts
Originally Posted by Mercury
Still having trouble getting the data from my tuner.

Just a thought, I am running the FORGE BPV on this turbo, could that affect the numbers?
No.
Old 07-31-2015, 06:16 AM
  #68  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
63 Nova SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-12
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,485
Received 316 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by colodude18
No.
I am also running the forge and they are good bpv's. Correction. On my traps, after looking they were 112 spinning, and the 13:30 was 110. I should be in the high 12's by the end of the year. Hope you got your car right.
Old 07-31-2015, 01:46 PM
  #69  
Rent me! per hour
 
Area47's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
well that's festive.
Old 08-03-2015, 02:59 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CudaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-21-09
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 11,295
Received 74 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by Mercury
I want to see if this makes sense... And just to clarify, I am not doubting my tuner. (he has tuned about 4 of my cars over the past 7 years with excellent numbers.)

Here is what is done to the car.

ZZP ZFR6758
ZZP 200 Cell Catted Downpipe
Hahn IC pipes
CS FMIC
KY Stage 3 Clutch

It was an extremely hot day. 96 degrees outside! This was on a mustang dyno, tuned with HP Tuners.

318 Whp
333 Wtq

The other numbers on this graph are from the previous tune they did with the stock turbo.

Any thoughts?
previous run was a 267 whp/ 292trq? and now you see a 318whp with a ZFR and tune? Do you have any info on the previous run? temperature?

If the conditions were similar then I think 318whp for a ZFR is incredibly low.


Get a new tuner
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KMO43
Front Page News
33
01-12-2016 12:01 AM
maliki778
Dyno Results
4
10-01-2015 07:39 PM
nathan112i
Featured Car Showcase
41
09-30-2015 07:12 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
09-27-2015 08:53 PM
Shane H
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
7
09-20-2015 11:56 AM



Quick Reply: ZFR Dyno



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 PM.