10000+ MAF Frequency
10000+ MAF Frequency
So my MAF frequency, during WOT for most of my powerband is over 10000
this can't be good
i am running stage 2 tune, 2.8" pulley, Injen CAI, and ngkbr7e's gapped at .40
should i regap? how bad is this?
should i put my stock airbox back on?
this can't be good
i am running stage 2 tune, 2.8" pulley, Injen CAI, and ngkbr7e's gapped at .40
should i regap? how bad is this?
should i put my stock airbox back on?
i'm a n00b when it comes to tuning.. is it the higher it is, the leaner it is?
or is it the higher it is, the richer it is
and also, what are ideal #'s
i thought it was supposed to be around 7000
or is it the higher it is, the richer it is
and also, what are ideal #'s
i thought it was supposed to be around 7000
Originally Posted by sethallen
i'm a n00b when it comes to tuning.. is it the higher it is, the leaner it is?
or is it the higher it is, the richer it is
and also, what are ideal #'s
i thought it was supposed to be around 7000
or is it the higher it is, the richer it is
and also, what are ideal #'s
i thought it was supposed to be around 7000
Originally Posted by sethallen
how do you up your maf freq. then?
I think the only way to physically lower the maf frequency is to put a bigger pulley back (or the stock intake) on so you are not flowing so much air.
Originally Posted by sethallen
i'm just so paranoid b/c i'm getting about 4* of knock at WOT
and i am not sure if 10000 maf freq. is safe or not
and i am not sure if 10000 maf freq. is safe or not
I don't think it's the maf frequency causing the knock. There is no reason 10,000 is unsafe as long as your injectors can keep up. In my opinion, you are running out of fuel with the 2.8 which could cause the knock. Especially since it's so cold out today.
This is part of the reason I went with a LT1 maff. I don't have to scale it back, as it has a higher "window" (it can flow more). Try changing it as mentioned, or you could look into putting an LT1 or LS1 maff on.
"Upping the limit" and "scaling" your MAF calibration (up or down) are really 2 different things.
When someone uses the terms "upping the limit" , this is really just done to prevent the MAF Hi Freq DTC from failing when you have made flow (or engine RPM) improvements that will increase the air-mass up to the FAIL limit. Very easy and common adjustment in HPT.
Rescaling the MAF is a table string adjustment is done in an attempt to correct the correlation between the sensor frequency and the actual air-mass to compensate for changes/modifications to the intake/inlet OR (as BadBoy points out) if you install a LARGER MAF to eliminate any bottle-neck in the inlet tract. Proper rescaling of the MAF can really only be done using sophisticated flow equipment connected across your intake, but the good ol' trial & error method can sometimes be successfully employed.
HTH
WOT
When someone uses the terms "upping the limit" , this is really just done to prevent the MAF Hi Freq DTC from failing when you have made flow (or engine RPM) improvements that will increase the air-mass up to the FAIL limit. Very easy and common adjustment in HPT.
Rescaling the MAF is a table string adjustment is done in an attempt to correct the correlation between the sensor frequency and the actual air-mass to compensate for changes/modifications to the intake/inlet OR (as BadBoy points out) if you install a LARGER MAF to eliminate any bottle-neck in the inlet tract. Proper rescaling of the MAF can really only be done using sophisticated flow equipment connected across your intake, but the good ol' trial & error method can sometimes be successfully employed.
HTH
WOT
Originally Posted by WopOnTour
"Upping the limit" and "scaling" your MAF calibration (up or down) are really 2 different things.
When someone uses the terms "upping the limit" , this is really just done to prevent the MAF Hi Freq DTC from failing when you have made flow (or engine RPM) improvements that will increase the air-mass up to the FAIL limit. Very easy and common adjustment in HPT.
Rescaling the MAF is a table string adjustment is done in an attempt to correct the correlation between the sensor frequency and the actual air-mass to compensate for changes/modifications to the intake/inlet OR (as BadBoy points out) if you install a LARGER MAF to eliminate any bottle-neck in the inlet tract. Proper rescaling of the MAF can really only be done using sophisticated flow equipment connected across your intake, but the good ol' trial & error method can sometimes be successfully employed.
HTH
WOT
When someone uses the terms "upping the limit" , this is really just done to prevent the MAF Hi Freq DTC from failing when you have made flow (or engine RPM) improvements that will increase the air-mass up to the FAIL limit. Very easy and common adjustment in HPT.
Rescaling the MAF is a table string adjustment is done in an attempt to correct the correlation between the sensor frequency and the actual air-mass to compensate for changes/modifications to the intake/inlet OR (as BadBoy points out) if you install a LARGER MAF to eliminate any bottle-neck in the inlet tract. Proper rescaling of the MAF can really only be done using sophisticated flow equipment connected across your intake, but the good ol' trial & error method can sometimes be successfully employed.
HTH
WOT
Great post as usual.
Originally Posted by CobaltPerformanceParts
What model number for the lt-1 maf are you using. I have a few in stock and was wondering if they would work out.
I can get you a part number monday, but any LT1 maff works (vette, f-body, b-body,etc). I just bought an IAT sensor for a w-body, and an LT1 maff connector, and it works great!
Originally Posted by CobaltPerformanceParts
Cool. Are you guys running any oversized mafs yet? What sizes are you using?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



to 12000 I think...or 11000....I would take the intake off
