12.37 w/ turbo swap on rough tune
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
12.37 w/ turbo swap on rough tune
times were:
.8951 reaction
2.3948 60'
5.6807 330'
7.7809 594'
8.2508 1/8 @ 95.76mph
12.3728 1/4 @ 115.11mph
364whp on dynojet
using cometic head gasket, mahle 8.5:1, turbonetics gt-k 450 (bleeding off at 22~psi right now, will be cranking it up once the tune is good) and almost everything else stock except the supporting turbo equipment needed.
this is on a rough tune, since it's the first turbo my dad's shop has done, we're having some issues with the bogging on the bottom end (pretty bad) we're trying get one of the local shops that do alot of turbos to come help us with it this weekend with the tune. it is very capable of high 11's and traps of around 125~ if we can get the damn thing to stop giving us issues around 2000-2500 rpm. whatever it is i'm sure it's to do with our tune.
look for some slips in the low 11's if we hook up the bottle
.8951 reaction
2.3948 60'
5.6807 330'
7.7809 594'
8.2508 1/8 @ 95.76mph
12.3728 1/4 @ 115.11mph
364whp on dynojet
using cometic head gasket, mahle 8.5:1, turbonetics gt-k 450 (bleeding off at 22~psi right now, will be cranking it up once the tune is good) and almost everything else stock except the supporting turbo equipment needed.
this is on a rough tune, since it's the first turbo my dad's shop has done, we're having some issues with the bogging on the bottom end (pretty bad) we're trying get one of the local shops that do alot of turbos to come help us with it this weekend with the tune. it is very capable of high 11's and traps of around 125~ if we can get the damn thing to stop giving us issues around 2000-2500 rpm. whatever it is i'm sure it's to do with our tune.
look for some slips in the low 11's if we hook up the bottle
Senior Member
Joined: 07-11-05
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Hmmm...that must be selfinfliction because there is a similar thread on the RL forums 
:
:
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
i haven't been around alot because we were rebuilding my motor from when i blew it up on the dyno about 4-5 months ago, about a month ago we decided to go ahead and turbo it i won't get into the specifics of what's been done until the car is complete. and it gets tuned properly, we're having some serious bogging issues in the lower rpms
i'll post up a scan of the timeslip tomorrow when i can get to a scanner, but my times were:
.8951 reaction <edited for correct reaction time>
2.3948 60'
5.6807 330'
7.7809 594'
8.2508 1/8 @ 95.76mph
12.3728 1/4 @ 115.11mph
our biggest issue today was getting the damn thing off the line, once we get all of the bugs worked out we expect it to be in the high 11's and on the bottle we are shooting for 11 flat.
i'll post up a scan of the timeslip tomorrow when i can get to a scanner, but my times were:
.8951 reaction <edited for correct reaction time>
2.3948 60'
5.6807 330'
7.7809 594'
8.2508 1/8 @ 95.76mph
12.3728 1/4 @ 115.11mph
our biggest issue today was getting the damn thing off the line, once we get all of the bugs worked out we expect it to be in the high 11's and on the bottle we are shooting for 11 flat.
Senior Member
Joined: 07-11-05
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by memphisr24
IDK this smells fishy...technically, turbo balt never said it was a cobalt....yet, why would you have the user name turbo BALT?
how about some pics......
Senior Member
Joined: 06-28-06
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 2
From: Canada
damn almost a 2.4 60' and im presuming your on slicks too.
sounds to me like that thing isnt even close to its potential once you get it all sorted away.
I can see much faster times coming from that car.
sounds to me like that thing isnt even close to its potential once you get it all sorted away.
I can see much faster times coming from that car.
