42's and a 2.8.....
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
The stock valve *springs are good to slightly past 7250 rpm. My rev limiter has been set at 7250 rpm for over a year, and i shift when my light on my interceptor comes on (7075 rpm). By the time I shift i am almost at the limiter. I have only bumped it once or twice.
Last edited by Staged07SS; Sep 14, 2010 at 07:15 AM.
alright i need to get an interceptor cuz im gonna get tuning done when i add meth.
It's not the valves, its the valve springs. And that's at 7600 rpms.
I set my rev limiter to 7500. I'll shift at 7250 or so. I have 60k miles on the car. Been doing this for years. At the track, freeway, etc.... Engine runs fine.....
Shift at your own risk....
Shift at your own risk....
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Yes, thats what i meant. Thank you for clarifying 
GM recommends 78lb valve springs for anything past 7250 rpm. They actually say past 7000 rpm, but i have spoke to Bill (more tq more hp) about this, and he claims they will be fine slightly past 7250 rpm. Lots of people have been shifting at 7400 rpm for years w/o issue. Like Roel said "shift at your own risk".
If you want to rev to/past 7500 rpm it's recommended upgrading to neutral balance shafts.

GM recommends 78lb valve springs for anything past 7250 rpm. They actually say past 7000 rpm, but i have spoke to Bill (more tq more hp) about this, and he claims they will be fine slightly past 7250 rpm. Lots of people have been shifting at 7400 rpm for years w/o issue. Like Roel said "shift at your own risk".
If you want to rev to/past 7500 rpm it's recommended upgrading to neutral balance shafts.
Last edited by Staged07SS; Sep 14, 2010 at 07:32 AM.
I see how this has turned into more of a redline question. LOL. Its more about will I be ok with a tune for 42s and a 2.8 if I dont rev the hell out of it and exceed the duty cycles?
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
Yes gentleman I did, and thank you. I should have been a bit more specific. I was looking for more of a concesus. Seeing as how you two have answered I will go with a YES! LOL. Thank you for your time!
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
No problem, and good luck with your setup. Let us know how you make out.
Thank you all! For some reason I have to resubmit this post. Hmm.
Yes sir.
No problems here sir. Thank you!
No problems here sir. Thank you!
Last edited by bonylad; Sep 14, 2010 at 11:33 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
Correction, post by post. There is an infinite amount of misinformation on this damn forum. No one listens to me when I comment, and they follow the "herd over the cliff". I'm not right 100% of the time, not even 90%. But damnit! This board has a 99.9% fail rate on information
I think anyone that cares about there car on here listens. I'll give anyone the opportunity to say what they think is right. I hope there wasn't anybody who got hurt feelings from my questioning them. I just haven't seen a dyno of anyone on a stock top end (head, cams, springs) "building" power to 7000 on an M62. Don't get me wrong, I'm not bagging or trying to talk crap. If it's being done I just want to know how they are doing it. I'm too damn old to be trash talking on a forum anymore.



