2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Anybody running OTTP Stage 4 cams?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2014, 09:26 AM
  #26  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Speedytec's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-19-07
Location: -
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
While talking about cams here; we have something strange going on between two similar LSJ engines:

#1; LSJ, ported head, Harrop 80mm and ZZP stage 2 cams. (Cam base circle checked!) Runs quite decent and idles @42KPa with ~7% TB. Run it with 60lb's and also with the stock tune/injectors to check idle and low load behaviour. No issues besides dialing in the tune with new injectors.

#2; LSJ, ported head, Harrop 80mm and ZZP stage 1 cams. Idle and low load is sh*t. Top power is OK though, but this one only idles @53KPa and 11-12%ETB... It should idle with more vacuum due to the milder cams, as stock LSJ cams idle @33KPa.
We quickly checked the cam install with the chain links (OK), but next step will be controlling exact "cam timing with a degree wheel and valve lift. And measure the base circles + lift.
This engine also seems to have an exhaust leak at the header, but that should not influence idle vacuum that much, right?
Old 06-03-2014, 10:24 AM
  #27  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
mrbelvedere's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-05
Location: KY
Posts: 8,165
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
The stg1 zzp cams have a lsa of 109 the stg2 is 112 that is probably the difference in manifold vacuum an exhaust leak pre upstream o2 can effect idle quality
Old 06-03-2014, 01:11 PM
  #28  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Speedytec's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-19-07
Location: -
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
The stg1 zzp cams have a lsa of 109 the stg2 is 112 that is probably the difference in manifold vacuum an exhaust leak pre upstream o2 can effect idle quality

Yeah, LSA affects vacuum and so does duration. But should be the other way around. The milder Stage 1 cams should pull more vacuum than my stage 2's...
The stage 1's do 10KPa less vacuum on his engine and needs ~11%ETC to idle @875rpm. Weird..

Last edited by Speedytec; 06-03-2014 at 01:14 PM. Reason: edited
Old 06-03-2014, 02:19 PM
  #29  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
mrbelvedere's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-05
Location: KY
Posts: 8,165
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
lsa has more effect on manifold vacuum

if you look at the spec cards it should say to install the cams at 110 or 112
Old 06-03-2014, 02:32 PM
  #30  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Speedytec's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-19-07
Location: -
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
lsa has more effect on manifold vacuum

if you look at the spec cards it should say to install the cams at 110 or 112
According to ZZP's site:
ZZP Stage 2's have 111 LSA => pulls 42KPa vacuum @idle in my engine
Stock LSJ cams have 107,5 LSA and those gave me a 33KPa vacuum

His Stage 1's have 109 LSA and that is right between those 2 , but it only pulls 53 KPa vacuum. Probably due to the 11%ETC opening that his engine needs to keep idling...
(And we checked some old logs of his engine with stock LSJ cams fitted; also ~33KPa. :-/)

Checking cam profile and timing coming days.
Old 06-03-2014, 03:34 PM
  #31  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
mrbelvedere's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-05
Location: KY
Posts: 8,165
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
my zzp stg2 cams pulled 16in my custom cams pull high 12in
but 9.7in of vacuum on stock cams tells me the stock cams were probably out of time it should pull 19in(65kpa)
Old 06-03-2014, 04:16 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
SSfamilywagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-07-08
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,387
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sub'd for info since I will be going custom specs
Old 06-03-2014, 06:49 PM
  #33  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Speedytec's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-19-07
Location: -
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
my zzp stg2 cams pulled 16in my custom cams pull high 12in
but 9.7in of vacuum on stock cams tells me the stock cams were probably out of time it should pull 19in(65kpa)
I'm a metric European, so:
Stage 2 cam 16in (merc) vacuum will be 54KPa vacuum. => ~46KPa MAP reading. (Close to my measured 42KPa MAP)
Custom cam 12in = 41KPa => 59KPa MAP value

Stock cams 19-20in = 65KPa vac => 35KPa MAP; right what we measured on both stock engines. Think the LSJ cams and my Stage 2's were/are timed right...
Old 06-03-2014, 08:52 PM
  #34  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
mrbelvedere's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-05
Location: KY
Posts: 8,165
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
the other thing your missing about the stock cams is they are advanced 11deg

map and guage different post normal not metric

Last edited by mrbelvedere; 06-03-2014 at 09:03 PM.
Old 06-04-2014, 07:02 AM
  #35  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Speedytec's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-19-07
Location: -
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
the other thing your missing about the stock cams is they are advanced 11deg
Not relevant; both engines measured with stock cams ~33KPa MAP, 20in vac, so mechanically nothing wrong with the engines. This is about the odd vac/map difference we find between the Stage 1 and stage 2 cams, while both cams are timed in a similar method...


Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
map and guage different post normal not metric
Old 06-04-2014, 07:21 AM
  #36  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
I see around 15 in with my S1 cams.

My car idles nice.

Sounds like something might be off with the TVS car with the S1 cams. Maybe a vac leak somewhere.

Last edited by Staged07SS; 06-04-2014 at 08:41 AM.
Old 06-04-2014, 08:36 AM
  #37  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
mrbelvedere's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-05
Location: KY
Posts: 8,165
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
camshaft advancement is relevant as it can change manifold vacuum

map sensor reads different then gague
Old 06-05-2014, 07:27 PM
  #38  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Speedytec's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-19-07
Location: -
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Staged07SS
I see around 15 in with my S1 cams.

My car idles nice.

Sounds like something might be off with the TVS car with the S1 cams. Maybe a vac leak somewhere.
it has no vac leak, his the ETB is around 11-12% @idle. With a vac leak you would see the ecu closing the ETB more to lower rpm, and if that fails will lower spark to even negative if the actual idle rpm keeps higher tnan commanded idle. (we did have a leak before, as the ZZP dual pass plate interferes with the Harrop TVS...)

cams measure base circle 30mm, so ok. Now to check actual cam timing..
Old 06-05-2014, 09:37 PM
  #39  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
mrbelvedere's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-05
Location: KY
Posts: 8,165
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
I had no vac leaks but mine would idle in negative timing on the zzp stg2 cams it wound up being tune related
Old 06-06-2014, 07:11 AM
  #40  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Speedytec's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-19-07
Location: -
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
I had no vac leaks but mine would idle in negative timing on the zzp stg2 cams it wound up being tune related
That's why we're busy adjusting/comparing tunes and swapping injectors. Even back to stock injectors and GM settings to start fresh.
My engine idles & drives quite nice with stock GM injectors, his stage 1 cams not...

This weekend measuring cam lobe centers to rule that out.
Old 06-08-2014, 08:15 PM
  #41  
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Speedytec's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-19-07
Location: -
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So we did some measurements of the ZZP Stage 1 cams in the car. We repeated a few times with different measurement set-ups, but results were the same:

Degree wheel on the pulley, zeroed on TDC position and a measuring gauge on the valves.
Measured the crank degrees from start lift (0.050" on the gauge) to end lift at the same 0.050". Divide by 2 to get the lobe centerline degrees.

EXH: open @151*, close @346* => Lobe center = 248.5* ATDC => 111.5* BTDC (ZZP specs = 115*)
INT: open @-1*, close @193* => Lobe center = 97* ATDC (ZZP specs = 102*)

Lobe sep. angle = (111.5* + 97*)/2 = 104.25* (ZZP specs Stage 1 = 109* LSA)

These 5* less LSA degrees will create more valve overlap and very likely the cause of our poor vacuum and the idle bahaviour. Shame, as we especially bought ZZP cams because they are said to be accurately degreed for the LSJ... :-/
Old 06-08-2014, 09:18 PM
  #42  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
mrbelvedere's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-05
Location: KY
Posts: 8,165
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
I was figuring that it was out
Old 06-20-2014, 10:32 PM
  #43  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Zooomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-13-05
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Getting accurate cams from comp has been difficult at best. We're working with them on some new fixturing for their machines but it's in process. Add to that the base circle issues and misboxing and it's been a real struggle. If you were to buy an LSJ cam by part # from a random vendor who isn't checking them, the chance of it being accurate isn't very good.
We've had a lot that were close and we shipped them. This is the unfortunate reality of the state we're in.

Currently we've taken LSJ cams out of stock. we have piles of them if someone wants a deal and knows how to use them with adjustable gears. Brand new, boxes say the right things, cams aren't what they say tho.
Old 06-21-2014, 12:11 AM
  #44  
South Central *********
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
JapEatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-14-05
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,176
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
I need some adj gears
Old 06-21-2014, 12:22 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Spawne32's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-08
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why not run comp XE264HR-13, at the very least those arent regrinds and you shouldnt have any issues with the lash adjusters.

113400 - Cast core version Hydraulic Roller Camshafts
Old 06-27-2014, 09:03 AM
  #46  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Zooomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-13-05
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Spawne32
Why not run comp XE264HR-13, at the very least those arent regrinds and you shouldnt have any issues with the lash adjusters.

113400 - Cast core version Hydraulic Roller Camshafts
None of the ZZP LSJ cams from Comp are regrinds.
The above cams would not be as spec'd when you receive them.
Old 06-27-2014, 09:28 AM
  #47  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
mrbelvedere's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-05
Location: KY
Posts: 8,165
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
zoomer why don't you all offer better cam sets
Old 06-27-2014, 12:32 PM
  #48  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (4)
 
Josh@ottp's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-26-07
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,286
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Zooomer
Getting accurate cams from comp has been difficult at best. We're working with them on some new fixturing for their machines but it's in process. Add to that the base circle issues and misboxing and it's been a real struggle. If you were to buy an LSJ cam by part # from a random vendor who isn't checking them, the chance of it being accurate isn't very good.
We've had a lot that were close and we shipped them. This is the unfortunate reality of the state we're in.

Currently we've taken LSJ cams out of stock. we have piles of them if someone wants a deal and knows how to use them with adjustable gears. Brand new, boxes say the right things, cams aren't what they say tho.
I would say 1 out of 4 have too large of a base circle. A real pain in the ass.
Originally Posted by Spawne32
Why not run comp XE264HR-13, at the very least those arent regrinds and you shouldnt have any issues with the lash adjusters.

113400 - Cast core version Hydraulic Roller Camshafts
I don't think anyone sells regrinds for the LSJ anymore. You can get them done but why.
Old 06-27-2014, 08:27 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Spawne32's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-08
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Zooomer
Getting accurate cams from comp has been difficult at best. We're working with them on some new fixturing for their machines but it's in process. Add to that the base circle issues and misboxing and it's been a real struggle. If you were to buy an LSJ cam by part # from a random vendor who isn't checking them, the chance of it being accurate isn't very good.
We've had a lot that were close and we shipped them. This is the unfortunate reality of the state we're in.

Currently we've taken LSJ cams out of stock. we have piles of them if someone wants a deal and knows how to use them with adjustable gears. Brand new, boxes say the right things, cams aren't what they say tho.
What are you using to measure the cams that you say are out of spec directly from comp?
Old 06-27-2014, 08:35 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Spawne32's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-08
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Josh@ottp
I would say 1 out of 4 have too large of a base circle. A real pain in the ass.


I don't think anyone sells regrinds for the LSJ anymore. You can get them done but why.
Not sure what you mean "but why?". Regrinds are the only way car's that don't have a large aftermarket normally get into the aftermarket camshaft game, and typically when there are issues with running out of base circle for more aggressive profiles you can just hardweld the cam. I just had a set of LE5 cams reground to Kelford's EVO 9 272 cam design only in a single pattern setup, no issues there, just gotta know your lift limits more than anything. I stopped at .425/.425. No reason to run any higher than that unless the head supports it.


Quick Reply: Anybody running OTTP Stage 4 cams?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:10 AM.