b&w or Hurt?
I was able to improve my B&M greatly by simply making it shorter . I got rid of the reverse lockout , so I could cut off about 1.5" ....then rethreaded the end . The end result was enuff to make me happy . The shift travel is greatly reduced and the feel is much firmer going thru the gears .
Im probably an extreme case in my opinions with the shifter , most seem to be happy with it .
I guess maybe my opinions are based more on what Im used too . Even with the aftermarkets , yes it does feel much more substantial and positive due to the beefier stick , but it still feels horrible imo . The throws arent that reduced , its still very wobbly and clumsy . To both B&M and Hursts credit though , most of the problems are the design of stock shifter base and the cables .
I was able to improve my B&M greatly by simply making it shorter . I got rid of the reverse lockout , so I could cut off about 1.5" ....then rethreaded the end . The end result was enuff to make me happy . The shift travel is greatly reduced and the feel is much firmer going thru the gears .
Im probably an extreme case in my opinions with the shifter , most seem to be happy with it .
I was able to improve my B&M greatly by simply making it shorter . I got rid of the reverse lockout , so I could cut off about 1.5" ....then rethreaded the end . The end result was enuff to make me happy . The shift travel is greatly reduced and the feel is much firmer going thru the gears .
Im probably an extreme case in my opinions with the shifter , most seem to be happy with it .
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



