2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

BilletFlow.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 03:45 PM
  #26  
max_boost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit
Originally Posted by 1stbluSS
how hard is it to install a larger idler pulley ?
You only have to remove one bolt.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 03:47 PM
  #27  
1stbluSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-31-05
Posts: 8,269
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
hey max.... you are getting yours installed tomorrow right ? Let me know with complete honesty how it feels... if you like it then I will go ahead and order it.... give me a call if you feel like

313-475-9820 frank

I will also order control arm bushings after seeing a guy get a 1.8 60 ft with them
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 04:11 PM
  #28  
c7015's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-05
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by 1stbluSS
I just made up my mind I will go with stg1 and a larger idler pulley... to me stg2 is a rip off only 5 more hp and 13 lbs of tq ... that is all achieved with the smaller pulley and this I already have.... i hope this isnt going to be a waste of money !

I guess it depends on if you beleive GM quoted numbers ..I would be money that gm was being very consirvative when guessing the gains from a smaller pulley to account for people from all elevations..
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 04:12 PM
  #29  
BooSSted's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-07-05
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 0
From: Bantario
^^ That's also with a Spec Clutch, Fidanza Flywheel and Drag Radials.....Bushing definitely make it possible though!
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 04:14 PM
  #30  
BooSSted's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-07-05
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 0
From: Bantario
Originally Posted by c7015
I guess it depends on if you beleive GM quoted numbers ..I would be money that gm was being very consirvative when guessing the gains from a smaller pulley to account for people from all elevations..
A smaller pulley is going to make more power though and in most cases it is cheaper as well!

I priced it out and for me to get GM Stage 1 with a 2.7" Pulley, it is going to be about $300 cheaper. It will probably make about 10-20 more HP as well!
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 04:16 PM
  #31  
c7015's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-05
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by BooSSted
A smaller pulley is going to make more power though and in most cases it is cheaper as well!

I priced it out and for me to get GM Stage 1 with a 2.7" Pulley, it is going to be about $300 cheaper. It will probably make about 10-20 more HP as well!

thats what I am doing too when i get back from Australia ... right now its 3" ..if I ever get the Pulley mix up sorted out with UPS.

(and yes its obviously going to make more hp that was my point that 2stbluess should not beleive gm's conservative estimate to cover their ass)
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 04:20 PM
  #32  
max_boost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit
Originally Posted by c7015
I guess it depends on if you beleive GM quoted numbers ..I would be money that gm was being very consirvative when guessing the gains from a smaller pulley to account for people from all elevations..
He already has the pulley part of the system though. So it would be a waste of money to him. If I didn't already have the BF on my car I would have went with S2.

1stbluSS, I'll let you know what I think. Honestly I'm not expecting to notice that much of a difference. There will be one, but since I've been running the 3.15 already it won't be as drastic as a guy going from stock to stage 1 or 2. I know there will be a very noticable difference when I put the 2.9 on, but I'm waiting until the new cluctch is broken in before it goes on.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 07:03 PM
  #33  
BoomInIt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-24-05
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: new orleans
There is quite a noticeable difference when I switch b/w 2.9" & 2.7". I could not imagine anything bigger than 2.9" or want to go back bigger.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 07:06 PM
  #34  
max_boost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit
Originally Posted by BoomInIt
There is quite a noticeable difference when I switch b/w 2.9" & 2.7". I could not imagine anything bigger than 2.9" or want to go back bigger.
Only time I'll be going back to the 3.15 is for the winter months. NO need to wear my winter tires out faster.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 07:10 PM
  #35  
BoomInIt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-24-05
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: new orleans
Originally Posted by max_boost
Only time I'll be going back to the 3.15 is for the winter months. NO need to wear my winter tires out faster.

Ah yes I did not think of that... we don't see much of a winter down here. We only have two seasons: SUMMER and cool. Its 90 today... which is gonna suck for good track times in the next couple months.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 AM.