2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Billetflow 3.1" Pully Installed and dyno'd

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 02:45 AM
  #1  
Blue04RedLine's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 04-30-05
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
Billetflow 3.1" Pully Installed and dyno'd

I was finally able to get into the shop to have the pully installed and dyno'd, before and after the pully just like I hoped. I went to Kelly Chevrolet/Kelly Performance (for those in South Fla) and had a guy named Angel help dyno and install the pully. For most of the runs I was actually the one running the computer, which was pretty cool. So I printed out sheets for all runs in both uncorrected numbers and SAE corrected ones. The computer was using a correction factor of 1.19 all day, so I figured it would be best to have both. Well the three runs before the pully were 208/194, 214/193, 215/191 (uncorrected). Those 3 runs were with just K&N CAI. We then installed the pully (right there w/o bothering to unstrap or remove the car). It's the 3.15 inch from Billetflow. I think the ECU was pulling timing at first, because the first three runs after the install was the first time that the car was on with the pully, and it didn't quite understand the extra air. After the first two runs, I did the little boost bypass mod, and it was extremely noticable (not only in overall power, but a longer powerband as well). Those 3 runs were 211/202, 212/199, 229/199 (<-- after the bypass mod); also uncorrected numbers. I uploaded the SAE corrected sheets as well. Could that third run increase in power be caused by only the bypass mod, or was the ECU getting used to the pully? O yeah, SAE corrected numbers after the pully were 252/241, 252/237, and 273/237 (<-- after bypass mod). By those numbers, you can see why I wanted the uncorrected ones as well. Sorry for the long post also guys (and gals). BTW, runfiles 7,8, and 9 were done before the pully (with just K&N CAI) and runfiles 10,11, and 12 were done after the pully. Runfile 12 was done WITH the boost bypass mod.

Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 02:45 AM
  #2  
Blue04RedLine's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 04-30-05
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
Also, here are some pictures of the pully. It's purty .




Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 08:06 AM
  #3  
freakaccident's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 12-27-05
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
How does it feel? Much difference in the butt dyno?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 08:12 AM
  #4  
R33P3R007's Avatar
360 L337 User
 
Joined: 08-11-05
Posts: 7,454
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, Pa
Did you change the belt or the tensioner? or just swap the pully. how long was tyhe install. mine is still siting on the table. I have to get the exhaust fixed on the car before I mess with a smaller pully
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 09:17 AM
  #5  
TxLonghorn#1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-05
Posts: 587
Likes: 1
From: Altus, OK/Austin, TX
Originally Posted by Blue04RedLine
I was finally able to get into the shop to have the pully installed and dyno'd, before and after the pully just like I hoped. I went to Kelly Chevrolet/Kelly Performance (for those in South Fla) and had a guy named Angel help dyno and install the pully. For most of the runs I was actually the one running the computer, which was pretty cool. So I printed out sheets for all runs in both uncorrected numbers and SAE corrected ones. The computer was using a correction factor of 1.19 all day, so I figured it would be best to have both. Well the three runs before the pully were 208/194, 214/193, 215/191 (uncorrected). Those 3 runs were with just K&N CAI. We then installed the pully (right there w/o bothering to unstrap or remove the car). It's the 3.15 inch from Billetflow. I think the ECU was pulling timing at first, because the first three runs after the install was the first time that the car was on with the pully, and it didn't quite understand the extra air. After the first two runs, I did the little boost bypass mod, and it was extremely noticable (not only in overall power, but a longer powerband as well). Those 3 runs were 211/202, 212/199, 229/199 (<-- after the bypass mod); also uncorrected numbers. I uploaded the SAE corrected sheets as well. Could that third run increase in power be caused by only the bypass mod, or was the ECU getting used to the pully? O yeah, SAE corrected numbers after the pully were 252/241, 252/237, and 273/237 (<-- after bypass mod). By those numbers, you can see why I wanted the uncorrected ones as well. Sorry for the long post also guys (and gals). BTW, runfiles 7,8, and 9 were done before the pully (with just K&N CAI) and runfiles 10,11, and 12 were done after the pully. Runfile 12 was done WITH the boost bypass mod.




One question...what the hell is "I did the little boost bypass mod"? What exactly is that mod?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 09:19 AM
  #6  
freakaccident's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 12-27-05
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by TxLonghorn#1
One question...what the hell is "I did the little boost bypass mod"? What exactly is that mod?

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/show...ght=bypass+mod
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 10:30 AM
  #7  
zinner's Avatar
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: 08-26-04
Posts: 4,944
Likes: 2
From: RTP, NC
Your graphs say 24.97 inches of hg thats pretty low for florida. Like right now it's 30.96 inches of hg in orlando.

Might wanna ask your shop why their reading is so off.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 11:37 AM
  #8  
Blue04RedLine's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 04-30-05
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
Originally Posted by zinner
Your graphs say 24.97 inches of hg thats pretty low for florida. Like right now it's 30.96 inches of hg in orlando.

Might wanna ask your shop why their reading is so off.
Yeah, we were talking about this on the RL forums as well. That's why the correction factor was so high, and I believe inaccurate. Thus the reason i'm only going by uncorrected numbers. The butt dyno feels very good. I have to go back at the end of the month to redyno, because the way we did it was not optimal (same day=good, car not used to pully=bad). The install didn't take very long at all. The hardest part was getting the belt back onto the tensioner pully (soooooo much pressure on that thing). O, the stock tensioner is good for this size pully, no need to swap.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
dennis69
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
7
Oct 20, 2015 07:39 AM
justinchinn
General Cobalt
3
Oct 2, 2015 12:18 PM
maliki778
Dyno Results
4
Oct 1, 2015 07:39 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 AM.