2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Don't go above 17 psi!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 12:35 PM
  #1  
Bad GTP's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Westerville OH
Don't go above 17 psi!

The new blowers on these LSJ engines are built with extremely tight tolerances. So tight that with excessive boost/heat, they blower rotors can actually seize against the blower housing.

We haven't yet seen or reached this point in our testing, but we are being warned in advance (by people who know) that anything at or above 18 psi of boost is definitely in the danger zone.

Anyone who goes below the 2.80" supercharger pulley size needs to understand that this is a serious risk. Rest assured that we're already working on solutions to this issue though...
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 12:37 PM
  #2  
1MEANSS's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-16-05
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: ft boost
thanks for the info....i guess your 2.8 pulley i have on my car is all i can do for awhile till you guys come up with somthing else for me....
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 12:38 PM
  #3  
stuffy236's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-26-05
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: San Marcos/Mcallen, Texas
Although with an eaton blower, adding certain mods reduces psi. So when someone reaches a 2.8 pulley with the mods you have, adding a header, ported heads, etc will lower boost allowing you to run a smaller pulley.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 12:41 PM
  #4  
3fo893013L's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-30-05
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 0
We need a blower upgrade ...
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 12:47 PM
  #5  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
HA HA! this is were the head work will come in!

......hmmmm so maybe it wasent such a waste

ALSO!

what about a water injection kit that sprays before the blower? the water on the vaines in the blower may kill some of the heat?

maybe so, maybe not?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 12:53 PM
  #6  
stuffy236's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-26-05
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: San Marcos/Mcallen, Texas
although Rob swears by it, there was a huge alky/meth injection craze in the GP community at one point, but no one ever got good results..... besides Rob. People were running small pulleys on little mods, but no one ever got faster. The turbo guys had some luck with it, but not the SC's.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 01:26 PM
  #7  
BLKSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-05
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Im going with GM kit so im in the safe zone. No more mods after that.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 01:33 PM
  #8  
Bad GTP's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Westerville OH
Im going with GM kit so im in the safe zone. No more mods after that.
Anything from the stock 85 mm. all the way down to our Stage 3 2.80" supercharger pulley size should keep you below the 18 psi threshold.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 02:55 PM
  #9  
97cavie24ls's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-14-05
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
From: phoenix , az
ive been runing alky injection for a while on my cav , and with the position of my IAT it reads the temp after the blower , and with the alky injection im able to make alot of passes in short time , with out the s/c getting heat soaked

and the M45 that is on my 2.4 is on the small side , so it builds heat quickly
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:06 PM
  #10  
pclear9061's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-06-05
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: California
its mainly the rpms that will cause the most amount of heat which will ruin the s/c the fastest. with having the s/c at the high rpms for a longer than just a couple seconds will cause the s/c to heat up the bearings and the rest of the internals and cause it to impulge (sp). have 18 lbs of boost at lower rpms will not harm it as much, from what i have been told. Its keeping the s.c at the 14,000 rpm continous max that will make the s/c burn up :p ........... thats what i was told
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 06:41 PM
  #11  
Jmc007's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Quebec City, Quebec
I think it's a combination of the CONTINUOUS operation with all these parameters : High speed (past 14 000 RPM's), too much boost and too much heat !
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 07:17 PM
  #12  
FAST06SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-07-05
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by pclear9061
its mainly the rpms that will cause the most amount of heat which will ruin the s/c the fastest. with having the s/c at the high rpms for a longer than just a couple seconds will cause the s/c to heat up the bearings and the rest of the internals and cause it to impulge (sp). have 18 lbs of boost at lower rpms will not harm it as much, from what i have been told. Its keeping the s.c at the 14,000 rpm continous max that will make the s/c burn up :p ........... thats what i was told


BINGO!!!!
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 07:18 PM
  #13  
pclear9061's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-06-05
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: California
well **** at least i was right about something today
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 07:20 PM
  #14  
FAST06SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-07-05
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by stuffy236
although Rob swears by it, there was a huge alky/meth injection craze in the GP community at one point, but no one ever got good results..... besides Rob. People were running small pulleys on little mods, but no one ever got faster. The turbo guys had some luck with it, but not the SC's.
Thanks for the plug

I run a 2.6" pulley(18psi), 24deg timing on my Impala, NO IC, and i use water injection. Right now, since the wife now drives it, 3" pulley (13psi boost), 17deg timing, 87octane NO KR! ONly because of WI!!!

It works, if it didn't, we would have lost WW2 do to all our airplanes overheating and crashing!
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #15  
pclear9061's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-06-05
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by FAST06SS
Thanks for the plug

I run a 2.6" pulley(18psi), 24deg timing on my Impala, NO IC, and i use water injection. Right now, since the wife now drives it, 3" pulley (13psi boost), 17deg timing, 87octane NO KR! ONly because of WI!!!

It works, if it didn't, we would have lost WW2 do to all our airplanes overheating and crashing!

on what car do you have that 3" pulley? what s/c is it?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 07:31 PM
  #16  
max_boost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit
Originally Posted by pclear9061
on what car do you have that 3" pulley? what s/c is it?
04 Impala SS on a M90 s/c
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #17  
stuffy236's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-26-05
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: San Marcos/Mcallen, Texas
Originally Posted by FAST06SS
Thanks for the plug

I run a 2.6" pulley(18psi), 24deg timing on my Impala, NO IC, and i use water injection. Right now, since the wife now drives it, 3" pulley (13psi boost), 17deg timing, 87octane NO KR! ONly because of WI!!!

It works, if it didn't, we would have lost WW2 do to all our airplanes overheating and crashing!

im just saying that no one has duplicated your success. MANY people have had injection but it never worked out for them....
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 07:50 PM
  #18  
max_boost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit
Originally Posted by stuffy236
im just saying that no one has duplicated your success. MANY people have had injection but it never worked out for them....
There were a few that tried it on their Red Lines with no success. I think most have taken it off the car.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 08:10 PM
  #19  
FAST06SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-07-05
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
There are 2 major keys that all who have failed did NOT have.

1) Tuner software + knowledge on how to use it

2) A good PWM, computer controlled WI controller

I have been using WI for 2 years now with great success do to those 2 items

Anything less will result in frustration and failure. Just ask my racing partner who tried to go budget an built his own
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #20  
dirtySSout's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-14-05
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Lawrenceville, GA
I hope that whipple or kenne bell make an upgrade in the near future because we are so limited with the m62!
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 10:39 PM
  #21  
ptparker's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 10-03-05
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Metro DC
I don't see kenne bell making one for our cars first. Considering virtually all of their s/c's are for V8's, and depending on where you draw the line, none of them are for sport/compacts.

BUT, i think that the whipple W200AX is roughly a similar physical size and they have a million different snout kits. It is a matter of time before a vendor gets one and starts expermenting with snouts, intercooler adapter plates, and throttle plates. Hint, hint

BTW, I lurk on this forum alot, but I am a pretty heavy poster on redlineforums.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 12:17 AM
  #22  
FAST06SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-07-05
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by dirtySSout
I hope that whipple or kenne bell make an upgrade in the near future because we are so limited with the m62!
?????? That statement makes no sense! We do fine with the 3800 and a smaller blower per cuin displacement!

You guys will soon see, it's PLENTY of blower!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jesse
Parts
22
Oct 20, 2015 09:56 PM
no_ss
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
Oct 18, 2015 11:58 PM
dieGone
Complete Cars
0
Oct 1, 2015 06:27 PM
Jesse
Stuff
0
Oct 1, 2015 05:47 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 PM.