High flow intake manifold***picking off where rebel stopped**
There are some nice drawings here, good ideas and great energy from Jn2 but there is no engineering analysis here its trial by error, and someone is gonna pay for it and the cooling enginering analysis if you care to do it, says this wont work. So what did youget for your money?
im sure a air>air setup could be done using long runners going under the blower and over towards the intake side, than the blower blowing down and into 2.5" piping leading to a IC...but i dont think there would be much interest in that

that something i whiped up in 3mins :p would be something like that...but would need a car on site to make it a production model...althought it is a good idea i may look for myself later
proof? I thought I read some poor numbers on an air to air set up with the tvs and a ported head somewhere I think thats all i've seen?
LOL. the engineers at GM when we did time attack were taken by ice bath. The gains are HUGE for power. The Bonneville Balt ran an ice bath. It also weighed about 5000 lbs. They want weight coz the wheels spin. Anyway we built it. it worked. awesome. add 150 lbs of ice, get way more power, lasts about 100 seconds. Net gain? slower lap times.
We hired an ice truck for the test. It used so much ice.
end of experiment. It is a great story and its true. It will work for 1/4 mile for sure...
There are some nice drawings here, good ideas and great energy from Jn2 but there is no engineering analysis here its trial by error, and someone is gonna pay for it and the cooling enginering analysis if you care to do it, says this wont work. So what did youget for your money?
But go ahead. I dont want to squash ideas but a little scientific method would be good to justify spending all that time and money.
We hired an ice truck for the test. It used so much ice.
end of experiment. It is a great story and its true. It will work for 1/4 mile for sure...
There are some nice drawings here, good ideas and great energy from Jn2 but there is no engineering analysis here its trial by error, and someone is gonna pay for it and the cooling enginering analysis if you care to do it, says this wont work. So what did youget for your money?
But go ahead. I dont want to squash ideas but a little scientific method would be good to justify spending all that time and money.
STFU!
"Honestly, I'll never run anything but water to air in any car I ever own again that has forced induction."
... That was reffering to ANY forced induction
I SWEAR MOM, I CAN READ!!!! READING>YOU
Air to water equals better cooling because you can achieve over 100% effciency and shorter piping for quicker spool time, if turbo or centfigual supercharger. On a roots blower it's almost necessary just to allow the shortest length of piping possible.
If you knew the advantages of air to water, and how they work, you'd want one for every kind of forced induction.
If you knew the advantages of air to water, and how they work, you'd want one for every kind of forced induction.
iat1 was 96 iat 2 was 112 on third back to back pull through third gear with a small desk fan in front of car.... so ya it sucked really bad didnt cool anything hahaha, that was it hahaha. im sure street tuning with some air actually going through the intercooler would show some better numbers
iat1 was 96 iat 2 was 112 on third back to back pull through third gear with a small desk fan in front of car.... so ya it sucked really bad didnt cool anything hahaha, that was it hahaha. im sure street tuning with some air actually going through the intercooler would show some better numbers
Oh and it won't sucrifice(sp?) flow.
Air to water equals better cooling because you can achieve over 100% effciency and shorter piping for quicker spool time, if turbo or centfigual supercharger. On a roots blower it's almost necessary just to allow the shortest length of piping possible.
If you knew the advantages of air to water, and how they work, you'd want one for every kind of forced induction.
If you knew the advantages of air to water, and how they work, you'd want one for every kind of forced induction.
Secondly... Don't argue points like shorter piping will have less lag, no sh*t. But in a properly setup an air>air there will be such a minimal amount more lag from the piping it wouldn't matter...
Lastly, tell me why all these engineers who are designing the SS/TC, NSRT-4, CSRT-4, Buick Grand NAtional, EVO, ETC, ETC... are using air>air... it is because in these cases (turbocharging) air>air is more logical and cost effective... Don't tell me you will install a water to air on every forced induction setup you ever own...
If they are able to design a new water to air intake manifold for our cars. First off it will cost >$600 to break even with design time and materials... (that doesn't count markup to make a profit) and it wont yield as good of cooling numbers as a properly setup air>air...
Don't know according to slowswap you show have a 100% efficient setup which would mean the water is being cooled to ambient temps and the air going through the laminovas would cool the IAT2's down to ambient, being the system is 100% efficient.
Last edited by schamsy; Jul 15, 2009 at 10:34 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Actually, I don't really think the cooling loop is the issue. For one, I removed the foglights that would be blocking air getting to the intake. There is nothing to work around and the air has a straight shot to the intake. That most likely means that the maf sensor itself is hot and won't cool down past a certain temperature. It's reading way higher than ambient temps, before the coolant loop would even have anything to do with cooling the compressed air down. The fenderwell has also been sealed off so no hot air from the engine compartment can get inside.
Actually, I don't really think the cooling loop is the issue. For one, I removed the foglights that would be blocking air getting to the intake. There is nothing to work around and the air has a straight shot to the intake. That most likely means that the maf sensor itself is hot and won't cool down past a certain temperature. It's reading way higher than ambient temps, before the coolant loop would even have anything to do with cooling the compressed air down. The fenderwell has also been sealed off so no hot air from the engine compartment can get inside.
Lastly, tell me why all these engineers who are designing the SS/TC, NSRT-4, CSRT-4, Buick Grand NAtional, EVO, ETC, ETC... are using air>air... it is because in these cases (turbocharging) air>air is more logical and cost effective... Don't tell me you will install a water to air on every forced induction setup you ever own...
Dude get off this forum, I'm going to save you from flaming... I am making a statement right now...
If they are able to design a new water to air intake manifold for our cars. First off it will cost >$600 to break even with design time and materials... (that doesn't count markup to make a profit) and it wont yield as good of cooling numbers as a properly setup air>air...
If they are able to design a new water to air intake manifold for our cars. First off it will cost >$600 to break even with design time and materials... (that doesn't count markup to make a profit) and it wont yield as good of cooling numbers as a properly setup air>air...
There are no laminova cores on this new manifold which is why it'll work so well. It will be able to cool very effectivly.



