2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

How much does the CAT restrict HP????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 02:04 PM
  #26  
djt81185's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-19-05
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 0
From: Horseheads, NY
Originally Posted by Bad06SS
I'm just messin with you, no "oozing sarcasm". But in all honesty, there's no proof that you actually lose torque by getting rid of the cat. If I had the money, I would dyno the car with a cat, and then without to prove it's worth more than 1-2 horsepower. Also, Dan, if I recall, you were only trapping 103ish when you raced with Rob, and were getting KR. Funny how when you finally took the cat off, you trapped closer to 109 and didn't have kr?

I had 1 106 trap wth the cat...then that crappy night at muncie i ran like 104 ish all night i think...then i had cat removed and went 107+ consistantly..We had 2 car setup identical here and the one w/o the cat (mine) would always pull from 40 on...its definately worth the power and KR reduction
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 02:06 PM
  #27  
Bad06SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-10-05
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by djt81185
I had 1 106 trap wth the cat...then that crappy night at muncie i ran like 104 ish all night i think...then i had cat removed and went 107+ consistantly..We had 2 car setup identical here and the one w/o the cat (mine) would always pull from 40 on...its definately worth the power and KR reduction

It's probably worth ~1-2mph in traps, you just have to decide if it's worth the increase in sound. For me, it was.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 02:18 PM
  #28  
SS33's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-06
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by djt81185
I had 1 106 trap wth the cat...then that crappy night at muncie i ran like 104 ish all night i think...then i had cat removed and went 107+ consistantly..We had 2 car setup identical here and the one w/o the cat (mine) would always pull from 40 on...its definately worth the power and KR reduction
Ok, I'm sold now. I was already leaning towards this route anyways,,, I was having major heartburn at the thought of spending the extra cash for a high flow cat.

I love Michigan for not having sniffer tests. We don't need no stinking cat

Now the only question left is, at what boost levels would the 3" show benfit as compared to the 2.5"??

I'll probably never go further than my 2.8" pulley,,, maybe a 2.7 eventually, but not in the foreseeable future.

Is there any reason that I should NOT go with a 2.5" DP?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 02:20 PM
  #29  
djt81185's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-19-05
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 0
From: Horseheads, NY
Btw..new trans got approved today ill have it back bfore i come back to school
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 02:28 PM
  #30  
SS33's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-06
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
^^^ good news man

Last edited by SS33; Sep 21, 2006 at 03:32 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 02:40 PM
  #31  
Bad06SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-10-05
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by djt81185
Btw..new trans got approved today ill have it back bfore i come back to school

Good! Glad to hear that!
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 02:41 PM
  #32  
Bad06SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-10-05
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by SS33
Ok, I'm sold now. I was already leaning towards this route anyways,,, I was having major heartburn at the thought of spending the extra cash for a high flow cat.

I love Michigan for not having sniffer tests. We don't need no stinking cat

Now the only question left is, at what boost levels would the 3" show benfit as compared to the 2.5"??

I'll probably never go further than my 2.8" pulley,,, maybe a 2.7 eventually, but not in the foreseeable future.

Is there any reason that I should NOT go with a 2.5" DP?

Well, a 2.5" catless downpipe has been proven to be enough for 12's, if that means anything. However, I'm going with a catless 3" downpipe.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 03:04 PM
  #33  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
Originally Posted by bluecobaltss06
OK guys, I read a great article on this in a performance catalog. The did a dyno test with a straight pipe, and magnaflows high flow cat. They only showed a 1-2 hp difference with the test pipe. Now you have to realize by not having a CAT you are breaking a federal law. So is it really worth the 1-2 hp?
Sounds like the same thing I saw in Hot Rod magizine years ago. Like I said not really worth it IMO.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 03:07 PM
  #34  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
So how do you get it to not throw a CEL with no cat?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 03:18 PM
  #35  
Strider_2001's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 05-07-06
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Pekin, Il
How bout be =get some sound clips post of a CAT and no CAT so we can all decide...
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 03:35 PM
  #36  
SS33's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-06
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Jackalope
So how do you get it to not throw a CEL with no cat?
HPTuners FTW

I think I will go with the 2.5" catless. That should be good for all I'll ever wanna do with her.

Now just hafta make up my damn mind on a header.

With my luck though I'll buy the DP, and a week later someone will announce a full long tube header,
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #37  
CTCOBALTSSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-21-06
Posts: 7,917
Likes: 2
From: CT
Originally Posted by SS33
HPTuners FTW

I think I will go with the 2.5" catless. That should be good for all I'll ever wanna do with her.

Now just hafta make up my damn mind on a header.

With my luck though I'll buy the DP, and a week later someone will announce a full long tube header,
XTC downpipe and header, total $370.00 plus $50.00 shipping = $420.00

Can't beat that my friend. Good quality stuff too.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 03:47 PM
  #38  
Bad06SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-10-05
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by SS33
HPTuners FTW
With my luck though I'll buy the DP, and a week later someone will announce a full long tube header,
CTI is the most long-tube out of the current header's made, I decided to go with their header and a catless downpipe.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 03:48 PM
  #39  
SS33's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-06
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by CTCOBALTSSS
XTC downpipe and header, total $370.00 plus $50.00 shipping = $420.00

Can't beat that my friend. Good quality stuff too.
Came very close to buying that exact set-up until I noticed the 2.25" collector

Not sure I dig that very much. Now I'm back to being undecided.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 03:49 PM
  #40  
SS33's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-06
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Bad06SS
CTI is the most long-tube out of the current header's made, I decided to go with their header and a catless downpipe.
I agree,,, and I may go that route. But if I get a 3" header,,and 3" DP,, I know I'll talk myself into a 3" cat back,,, and I just don't know if I need, or want to go full 3"


decisions, decisions, lol
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 04:00 PM
  #41  
Bad06SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-10-05
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by SS33
I agree,,, and I may go that route. But if I get a 3" header,,and 3" DP,, I know I'll talk myself into a 3" cat back,,, and I just don't know if I need, or want to go full 3"


decisions, decisions, lol

Off topic: I had mine custom made to bolt up to my Corsa. I see no reason to get rid of my Corsa, it flows just fine and sounds great! So it's a CTI long-tube, with a 3" collector, 3" downpipe, flanged to bolt up to my Corsa.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 04:06 PM
  #42  
SS33's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-06
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Bad06SS
Off topic: I had mine custom made to bolt up to my Corsa. I see no reason to get rid of my Corsa, it flows just fine and sounds great! So it's a CTI long-tube, with a 3" collector, 3" downpipe, flanged to bolt up to my Corsa.
Did CTI, do that flange for you? Or did you have it done locally?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 04:14 PM
  #43  
Bad06SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-10-05
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by SS33
Did CTI, do that flange for you? Or did you have it done locally?
They supposedly did it for me (haven't got it yet, can't stand Fed Ex).
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 09:27 PM
  #44  
Matty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-27-06
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
From: eh
Originally Posted by SS33
Came very close to buying that exact set-up until I noticed the 2.25" collector

Not sure I dig that very much. Now I'm back to being undecided.
They are supposed to be coming out with 2.5 and 3" after they get rid of the 2.25" ones. Or so the story goes. Hang tight.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 09:39 PM
  #45  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by Bad06SS
Sorry, I don't agree. I would say there's a good 10whp going to a straight pipe. The stock cats are restrictive, and on top of that, they get too hot and fail alot because they can't keep up with increased boost. I've personally looked at our stock cat, and you can't even see through to the other side! Putting a straight pipe in decreases kr and boost, and I've seen nothing but benefits from mine. Also, unless I see proof, I'm calling BS on the loss of low end torque as well. With that said, you're exhaust will become alot louder, and sound more raspy, so choose you cat-back wisely. I happen to think that the Corsa Touring sounds great with no cat!

you lose a little low end torque because of the big drop in back-pressure.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 11:16 PM
  #46  
patathSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-15-05
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
From: OP, KS
Originally Posted by bluecobaltss06
OK guys, I read a great article on this in a performance catalog. The did a dyno test with a straight pipe, and magnaflows high flow cat. They only showed a 1-2 hp difference with the test pipe. Now you have to realize by not having a CAT you are breaking a federal law. So is it really worth the 1-2 hp?
What kind of car? Forced induction? 8 cylinder? 4 cylinder? What make? Displacement?

There are so many variables that it is impossible to tell if that scenario would be the same for our cars. Our cat is like a damn brick blocking the flow.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 11:23 PM
  #47  
kissmySS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-05
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
From: London, Ontario
Originally Posted by Smokem10
is the high flow CAT worth the money?

For the gains it provides, i wouldnt waste the money, not much difference...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
nathan112i
Featured Car Showcase
41
Sep 30, 2015 07:12 PM
goaliemo
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
6
Sep 28, 2015 01:37 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
Sep 26, 2015 06:44 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 AM.