interesting read on maft vs AFC 2.2
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: 04-26-05
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: San Marcos/Mcallen, Texas
interesting read on maft vs AFC 2.2
http://zzperformance.com/cobalt_ion/...8554c55cf28e76
dont know how many of you saw this, but i thought it was interesting
dont know how many of you saw this, but i thought it was interesting
New Member
Joined: 10-25-04
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
It might be interesting but is is also totaly inaccurate:
MAFT is 2% WOT adjustment. Not 5% like they claim
MAFT is available plug-and-play for Cobalt
Faster microprocessor is MEANINGLESS DRIVEL. The PCM only
calculates fuel every 12.5 mS. The MAFT runs at ~1ms.
anything faster than the PCM has no effect. The 89 cent PIC
processor they use is less powerful than the MAFT. It works
fine as does the MAFT.
The MAFT can't really be called "heavy", it is larger than
the mini. With the label removed it is as inconspicuous as
any of the other black boxes under the hood. With the Mini
you have a box hanging off your MAF. It is easy to conceal
either device under the hood.
Mike Licht
MAFT is 2% WOT adjustment. Not 5% like they claim
MAFT is available plug-and-play for Cobalt
Faster microprocessor is MEANINGLESS DRIVEL. The PCM only
calculates fuel every 12.5 mS. The MAFT runs at ~1ms.
anything faster than the PCM has no effect. The 89 cent PIC
processor they use is less powerful than the MAFT. It works
fine as does the MAFT.
The MAFT can't really be called "heavy", it is larger than
the mini. With the label removed it is as inconspicuous as
any of the other black boxes under the hood. With the Mini
you have a box hanging off your MAF. It is easy to conceal
either device under the hood.
Mike Licht
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post