2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Kennyspec's Turbo Tuning Thread.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 11:56 PM
  #1  
Kennyspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-06
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: winnipeg
Kennyspec's Turbo Tuning Thread.

So now that i got the car up and runing here scmes the "fun" part, tuning it.

I am basically running a stock stg2 tune with the stg2 injectors. Running the car at 10psi.

I have 60# at home i just want to get all the kinks out of it before i switch over to the 60#s...Yes i know ill have to retune everything once the 60's are in but i just want to get it running good before i start messing with injectors.

So heres my first problem......Anything above 5PSI and 3000rpm in the spark tables the cylinder airmass maxes out almost instantly. How come? LOL i know something is not right. The MAF is blow through in a 3" Pipe.

Next, when rolling into the throttle the car sputers and cuts out as soon as you hit boost. It only does this about 4 or 5 times then it runs perfectly untill you shut it off, then it does it all over again........I think it may be the plugs i need new ones and it could be how my PE curve is set up it pretty much goes to a 11.5AFR as soon as you hit boost. I think i need to ramp it into PE instead of coming on instantly. Any thoughts???

Lets iron those kinks out first then see what the next problems are ..........Arent turbos fun..
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 10:19 AM
  #2  
Kennyspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-06
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: winnipeg
Ah come on no one wants to help out?
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 10:23 AM
  #3  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
get to work.

you've got hours and hours to go.

ps- dial in the maf.....the do it again, and again, and again.

Last edited by 06black; Apr 28, 2008 at 10:23 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 12:36 PM
  #4  
Kennyspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-06
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: winnipeg
I know i got a shitload of work to be done....But the main thing i was wondering is if its normal for the Spark tables to be maxed out at 1.36 g/cyl....Or does that have something to do with my shitty MAF calibration?
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #5  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
meh, its all boost dependent. but we are all off table once boost hits.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 01:07 PM
  #6  
BlackSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-18-05
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 0
From: Canada eh!
I used to be off the timing tables, but now with the return system and higher WOT fuel pressure I stay a little bit further up it.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #7  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
you shouldn't be off the maf tables yet, nor the timing tables.

maf + pe = fun!

check for boost leaks. get the 60's in there. rise, repeat
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 02:03 PM
  #8  
06blackg85ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-06
Posts: 15,211
Likes: 20
From: New York
timing table maybe not, maf tables definitely not. I don't even max those out.
But like they said, tune, log, repeat until she's dialed in. Kill that poopy dynamic airflow, and straight maf tune the bitch. Car will be much better
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 02:09 PM
  #9  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
also. something else too. if you **** the mas air settings too much. it will jump to a different g/cyl airmass reading.

i personally hate gm for the dynamic airflow changes over the years.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 03:34 PM
  #10  
Kennyspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-06
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: winnipeg
Ya i think thats what has happened, The MAf calibration is fucked up. Im gonna start over with a stg2 maf calibration and go from there.

Just to make sure im doing this right heres what i do......

I am shooting for a 11.4AFR for now. so i set the PE table to 14.7/11.4= 1.29

then using the MAF HZ Vs. AFR ERROR histogram log that and then copy, paste by % error into the maf table right???
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #11  
06blackg85ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-06
Posts: 15,211
Likes: 20
From: New York
thats prett much it, don't get on it too hard
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 04:19 PM
  #12  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
you get to a point where you know what the numbers should be for X afr via maf Vs pe. then past this point you don't care
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 12:36 AM
  #13  
Kennyspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-06
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: winnipeg
Ok im pretty sure i know what my problems are now......

I turned up the boost to 12.5psi tonight and was trying to tune the afr to a 11.5 and the car just wasnt having it. Was way to lean and i was using the MAF HZ Vs. AFR Histo and the car just wouldnt richen up........ id richen it up by %40 and it would do nothing. Then just for fun i started playing with the VE table and copied the AFR error over into it and it works great now. The car holds a steady AFR.

I also noticed that i have a p101 MAF performance low. I think my MAF is fucked.......that would explain why i cant get the car to do anything copying the AFR error into the MAF table......but yet copying the AFR error into the VE table it works great...i do have the dynamic air tables set to 2000rpm so above 2000rpm the car "should" be using only the MAF but its running off the VE table.

The maf curve is so fucked up that at 6900hz and above i maxed out the values at 511.99 and it still didnt richen up. The MAF has gotta be hooped. Im going to be trying a new one on the weekend.

Also with the MAF values being that high i am maxing out the spark tables at 2psi. im gonna revert back to the stock stg2 maf calibration and just tune the VE table and see where that can get me untill i try out the new maf on the weekend.

Any thoughts?
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 08:17 AM
  #14  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
you either have the worst charge pipe set up ever or a jacked maff....
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 08:58 AM
  #15  
Kennyspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-06
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: winnipeg
Its 2.5 inch from the turbo to about 8" before the maf is where it goes to 3" then its 3" to the throttlebody........

Im thinking its the MAF as i keep gettin the p101 maf sensor performance low code.
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 09:01 AM
  #16  
lewisb13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-07
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
From: Home: Utica, MI Current Location: Mobile, Alabama
Post your logs
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 12:42 PM
  #17  
Kennyspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-06
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: winnipeg
im gonna try a new MAF on the weekend. If that doesnt help it then ill get some logs.
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 11:24 PM
  #18  
Kennyspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-06
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: winnipeg
ok i got some things figured out tonight.........the bog issue was a MAF MAP correlation code....the MAF values were so high that i was getting a p0068 code and it was cutting out when entering PE.

So i flashed it with a stock stg2 tune and heres where it gets werid.......In theory it should be all MAF controlled right?? i changed the dynamic airflow tables to 2200rpm. so above 2200rpm its all MAF controlled. So i went to do some runs and it was super lean, 14.5ish so i didnt even get into it hard. Then i increased the VE table %20 above 100MAP and then did a pull and the AFR is almost right in line at 11.4 where i have the PE table set to.

Why is the VE table affecting the tune so much when it really shouldnt be???

Also when using the stock stg2 MAF calibration the spark table isnt off the charts no more. I get about 1.00 g/cyl at WOT.

Still thinking that my MAF is fried. ill post up a log using the stock stg2 MAf calibration and a modified VE table. 2nd and 3rd gear pull at about 12psi.



kinda a shitty pic.......where can i hosst it on a different site?

Last edited by Kennyspec; May 1, 2008 at 11:24 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
anotherslowlnf
Parts
15
Sep 29, 2015 03:52 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM
OPCrer
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
3
Sep 27, 2015 08:11 PM
Adiaz1ss
Problems/Service/Maintenance
4
Sep 26, 2015 11:51 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 AM.