Lightweight Rotors for Eaton Superchargers
Lightweight Rotors for Eaton Superchargers
Lightweight Rotors for Eaton Superchargers. fromStiegemeier Porting Services, LLC - Supercharger Rebuild and Repair
anyone know anything about this.
faster revs? less parasitic loss?
anyone know anything about this.
faster revs? less parasitic loss?
I gotta think there are bigger fish to fry in the battle for more power. Now granted those aren't real expensive so you aren't out much, but unless you are trying to skirt some rules for class racing I have to think you should be looking elsewhere.
Thats too bad, I'd love to see new high twist hollow core rotors.
Good to see more options for the SC crowd, I'm seriously thinking about sending my spare snout out to get liquid cooled.
Good to see more options for the SC crowd, I'm seriously thinking about sending my spare snout out to get liquid cooled.
i can see these freeing up a lil power because they are lighter, less rotating mass = quicker revs. i could also see these staying cooler aswell. i think its a good buy if you paired them up with a ported blower.
I like the cored rotors. I think that would be a bigger gain than neutral shafts. For anyone revving high/small pulley this might be a great mod. **** I bet with cored rotors I wouldn't have had to change to 6 rib(no belt slip with lighter weight). Depending on the price I may consider this when/if I rev the **** out of my engine later this year.
I'd like to hear about the physics of this design, everything I've read about the m62 shows it is a bullet proof low tech design with some serious limitations. How much weight could realistically be gutted from the rotor pack? I can see a faster heat soak recovery, but I'm not sure how much parasitic power is actually lost from the mass of the rotors as opposed to the inherent inefficiency of the rotor twist and the basic roots type design itself. For my cash I like the idea of cutting snout heat in 1/2 and as a direct result pulling heat off the rotors via heat convection.
Joined: 05-18-11
Posts: 39,564
Likes: 87
From: West Chicago, IL
I'd like to hear about the physics of this design, everything I've read about the m62 shows it is a bullet proof low tech design with some serious limitations. How much weight could realistically be gutted from the rotor pack? I can see a faster heat soak recovery, but I'm not sure how much parasitic power is actually lost from the mass of the rotors as opposed to the inherent inefficiency of the rotor twist and the basic roots type design itself. For my cash I like the idea of cutting snout heat in 1/2 and as a direct result pulling heat off the rotors via heat convection.



