Is the LSJ oil pan a bad design?
All I can say is read rather than argue.
There is more than you think to a PCV system.
http://www.engineprofessional.com/ar...Q315_34-44.pdf
There is more than you think to a PCV system.
http://www.engineprofessional.com/ar...Q315_34-44.pdf
All I can say is read rather than argue.
There is more than you think to a PCV system.
http://www.engineprofessional.com/ar...Q315_34-44.pdf
There is more than you think to a PCV system.
http://www.engineprofessional.com/ar...Q315_34-44.pdf
We know that on NA Ecotecs the PCV system is far from complex. they have no check valve and have a fixed restriction device. Then on an LSJ, that has nothing different other than a check valve in the IM (may have dynamic metering or may have fixed metering with a check valve that has a primary function of stopping backflow because of boost) The latter makes sense because why would the LSJ PCV system need the added complexity over it's NA siblings? If fixed metering works fine on the L61, which isn't much different conceptually than the LSJ other than a supercharger, why is it so stupid to imagine maybe it ALSO has a fixed metering device and they added a check valve because of the supercharger making boost?
We get that on many typical PCV systems the PCV valve does actually have dynamic metering. But are you sure that is the case on Ecotecs? We know that isn't the case for NA Ecotecs, so what documentation do you have, that we don't, that proves LSJ Ecotecs actually have dynamic metering and that the valve in the IM is anything but a simple check valve?
We get that on many typical PCV systems the PCV valve does actually have dynamic metering. But are you sure that is the case on Ecotecs? We know that isn't the case for NA Ecotecs, so what documentation do you have, that we don't, that proves LSJ Ecotecs actually have dynamic metering and that the valve in the IM is anything but a simple check valve?
Last edited by jdbaugh1; Mar 22, 2018 at 06:52 AM.
I think you must have misunderstood me. I never claimed there was no metering, I said the metering was fixed via orifice size and that the valve part of it is just a check valve. I still don't think the valve dynamically modulates flow like other PCV systems. So my conceptual understanding of how the system works hasnt really changed.
Pretty sure it is just a check valve from the crank case into the intake manifold. Check valve is open under vacuum and closed under boost. Under vacuum fresh air can only enter through the breather port on the valve cover. Under vacuum crank case air is sucked into the intake manifold and that air mass is replaced by blowby gasses and fresh air through the valve cover. As far as I know, the only metering mechanism is the orifice size in the head. The valve in the IM is simply a check valve and doesn't do any sort of metering.
Did you read the sentence directly above the one you highlighted in red? Also do you know what conceptual means? The concept of how the system functions does not care if the metering orifice is in the head or intake manifold.
Dammit slowbalt dont delete my whole comment explaining that on a conceptual level the orifice(metering device) being in the head or IM makes no difference. I can edit out the part of my comment that was a little snarky. It was definitely PG though
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TurboWood
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
26
Dec 1, 2015 08:01 PM



Moderator