Ported lower intake.....

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 7, 2008 | 06:05 PM

#101

ebristol

Senior Member

iTrader: (4)

Joined: 04-15-07

Posts: 5,457

Likes: 3

From: WI

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Jayson-

porting an intake manifold will actually raise IAT temps,

No. They drop.

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Jayson-

Also you should see an increase in boost because the boost pressure is measured after the laminova cores, removing the restriction will allow more boost to build after the cores.

No. It drops. My dropped about .25psi.

Nov 7, 2008 | 06:13 PM

#102

invisible

Senior Member

Joined: 08-22-06

Posts: 7,591

Likes: 1

From: In a house.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebristol

No. They drop.

No. It drops. My dropped about .25psi.

Do you have any hp changes?

Nov 8, 2008 | 12:33 AM

#103

Deathscythe

Senior Member

Joined: 07-28-06

Posts: 4,994

Likes: 0

From: Waldorf, MD

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega_5

I sure hope that wasn't directed over here....

if you're thinking the statement was directed at you then no. But when less restriction = more boost then common sense is not being applied by the person who made the statement.

Nov 21, 2008 | 04:17 PM

#104

quadracer0387

Senior Member

Joined: 05-15-07

Posts: 1,828

Likes: 0

From: Cincinnati, Ohio

bumpage

Nov 21, 2008 | 04:44 PM

#105

Deathscythe

Senior Member

Joined: 07-28-06

Posts: 4,994

Likes: 0

From: Waldorf, MD

seriously...

Nov 21, 2008 | 04:46 PM

#106

quadracer0387

Senior Member

Joined: 05-15-07

Posts: 1,828

Likes: 0

From: Cincinnati, Ohio

mines in the mail.... yay

Nov 21, 2008 | 04:58 PM

#107

Deathscythe

Senior Member

Joined: 07-28-06

Posts: 4,994

Likes: 0

From: Waldorf, MD

did I mention I hate you... just thought I'd say that. You better post the results for me.

Nov 21, 2008 | 05:10 PM

#108

USMCFieldMP

Rattlesnake Race Shop

iTrader: (1)

Joined: 06-08-06

Posts: 15,725

Likes: 410

From: Fort Worth, TX

You guys make me wanna keep my car...

Nov 21, 2008 | 05:16 PM

#109

distillion

Senior Member

Joined: 05-11-05

Posts: 6,298

Likes: 1

From: mississauga

watching this thread.

Nov 21, 2008 | 05:51 PM

#110

quadracer0387

Senior Member

Joined: 05-15-07

Posts: 1,828

Likes: 0

From: Cincinnati, Ohio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deathscythe

did I mention I hate you... just thought I'd say that. You better post the results for me.

ill post them... i need to start my winter project, then i will go to the dyno and get tuned.

Nov 21, 2008 | 11:49 PM

#111

Deathscythe

Senior Member

Joined: 07-28-06

Posts: 4,994

Likes: 0

From: Waldorf, MD

alright, but only if you promise. lol

Nov 22, 2008 | 12:04 AM

#112

raptors_67

Senior Member

Joined: 02-06-05

Posts: 645

Likes: 0

From: sk

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Jayson-

no wrong

porting an intake manifold will actually raise IAT temps, when you port the intake manifold you decrease the amount of time the air spends moving through the laminova cores spends being cooled, you also increase the amount of air going past the cores. Also you should see an increase in boost because the boost pressure is measured after the laminova cores, removing the restriction will allow more boost to build after the cores.

you're forgetting that compressing a gas causes it to create heat regardless of the cores. Less compression is less heat.

Nov 22, 2008 | 09:16 AM

#113

quadracer0387

Senior Member

Joined: 05-15-07

Posts: 1,828

Likes: 0

From: Cincinnati, Ohio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deathscythe

alright, but only if you promise. lol

ill also be putting on a h/e and new i/c pump, installing my meth kit that is tapped into the ported manifold.... lots of work to do

Nov 22, 2008 | 10:12 AM

#114

Deathscythe

Senior Member

Joined: 07-28-06

Posts: 4,994

Likes: 0

From: Waldorf, MD

not going in for a ported head?

Nov 22, 2008 | 05:00 PM

#115

quadracer0387

Senior Member

Joined: 05-15-07

Posts: 1,828

Likes: 0

From: Cincinnati, Ohio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deathscythe

not going in for a ported head?

not this winter

Nov 22, 2008 | 05:05 PM

#116

selfinfliction

Banned

Joined: 06-23-05

Posts: 8,004

Likes: 0

From: ky

Quote:

Originally Posted by USMCFieldMP

You guys make me wanna keep my car...

don't keep it. many better options out there + gm running into the ground while the top 10 execs are pulling in over a billion dollars in bonuses every year EVEN THOUGH THE COMPANY IS RUNNING INTO THE GROUND

screw a bunch of chevy

Nov 25, 2008 | 10:56 PM

#117

quadracer0387

Senior Member

Joined: 05-15-07

Posts: 1,828

Likes: 0

From: Cincinnati, Ohio

received mine today... and i have to say, great quality work. +1 for ott

Nov 25, 2008 | 11:26 PM

#118

CobaltSS 16

Senior Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: 07-01-07

Posts: 4,144

Likes: 29

From: NJ

looking forward to the results and dyno numbers

Nov 26, 2008 | 01:34 AM

#119

burntorange

Senior Member

Joined: 09-13-06

Posts: 828

Likes: 0

From: San Antonio

Quote:

Originally Posted by CobaltSS 16

looking forward to the results and dyno numbers

I second that. If I feel they perform enough, I will jump in.

Oh, and good job OTTP for helping us cobalt guys out.

Thanks

Dec 4, 2008 | 10:21 AM

#120

Zooomer

Supporting Vendor

iTrader: (1)

Joined: 12-13-05

Posts: 1,693

Likes: 3

From: Grand Rapids, MI

It appears that the outlet slits from the IC are opened up. Am I seeing that incorrectly?

Dec 4, 2008 | 10:26 AM

#121

PhantomSS

Senior Member

Joined: 10-13-08

Posts: 1,198

Likes: 0

From: Georgia

can we see the dyno sheets on this? Also how about a stock m62 blower instead of a TVS blower?

Dec 4, 2008 | 11:10 AM

#122

lsjwannabe

Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: 01-23-06

Posts: 10,731

Likes: 0

From: on here

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zooomer

It appears that the outlet slits from the IC are opened up. Am I seeing that incorrectly?

Yes you are seeing correctly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhantomSS

can we see the dyno sheets on this? Also how about a stock m62 blower instead of a TVS blower?

It has been done on a m62, the gains were meger 5 whp, as far as cooling goes the gains were much much better about a 24* drop in iat's.

Last edited by lsjwannabe; Dec 4, 2008 at 11:10 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

Dec 4, 2008 | 11:13 AM

#123

PhantomSS

Senior Member

Joined: 10-13-08

Posts: 1,198

Likes: 0

From: Georgia

Quote:

Originally Posted by lsjwannabe

Yes you are seeing correctly.

It has been done on a m62, the gains were meger 5 whp, as far as cooling goes the gains were much much better about a 24* drop in iat's.

bout what i expected. im going to do dyno steps with the single pass im when i get the head on to see what kind of gains they do.

Dec 4, 2008 | 11:16 AM

#124

lsjwannabe

Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: 01-23-06

Posts: 10,731

Likes: 0

From: on here

The intake manifold is not that large of a restriction on the m62 in terms of flow, it does not disapate heat the best though.

Dec 4, 2008 | 11:23 AM

#125

PhantomSS

Senior Member

Joined: 10-13-08

Posts: 1,198

Likes: 0

From: Georgia

Quote:

Originally Posted by lsjwannabe

The intake manifold is not that large of a restriction on the m62 in terms of flow, it does not disapate heat the best though.

well yea, since the head is the bottleneck (imo, dynos will prove it). Also it was said that you need free flowing exhaust for the gains. More reason why i think the head is the bottleneck since the exhaust loses power over 3 inch on the stock m62.

i have a hunch this IM will make an extra 15 whp on a ported+rebuilt head.

Reply Share

First
Prev
5 / 7
Next
Last