2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Premium

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 11:04 AM
  #26  
M-Dub's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-19-05
Posts: 9,704
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
All I can get around here is 91-92 so that is what I have used since day 1!! And in the install manual of the S2 kit, it states PREMIUM FUEL REQUIRED!
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 11:09 AM
  #27  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Always wanted to say this:

Or you could trade in your SS/NA/SC for a LS/LT and not have to worry about the additional .20 a gallon
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 11:14 AM
  #28  
halfj99's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-18-06
Posts: 4,883
Likes: 0
From: Madison,WI
even my ls likes the 91 a whole lot better then 87-89

Originally Posted by Cobalter LS
Always wanted to say this:

Or you could trade in your SS/NA/SC for a LS/LT and not have to worry about the additional .20 a gallon
FTMFW!!!!

Last edited by halfj99; Mar 9, 2007 at 11:14 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 11:59 AM
  #29  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by shadowfaxss
With the rise of fuel prices I predominately use 89 octane and switch to 91-93 about twice a week. Keep in mind most of my driving is done on the hiway with no noticeable loss of power or any other problems. I drive 134 miles round trip each day. My DIC says average speed 51 mph and 27.6 mpg.

You definately must use premium fuel for the stage upgrades which is why I have not put a stage kit in yet. Fuel prices will continue to rise throughout the next fuel weeks for fear of a spring fuel shortage (particularly on the west coast), refinery maintenance, and oil is trading over $61 a barrel.
yea, that extra 2 dollars a week is a killer

i don't even look at gas prices anymore... i don't get why some people do, and would even go out of their way to save 3 cents a gallon on gas, but waste that 3 cents driving the extra mile to get there... people bitch and complain about it, but really, it's 2 dollars...
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 08:14 PM
  #30  
shadowfaxss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-14-06
Posts: 1,646
Likes: 1
From: PA
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
yea, that extra 2 dollars a week is a killer

i don't even look at gas prices anymore... i don't get why some people do, and would even go out of their way to save 3 cents a gallon on gas, but waste that 3 cents driving the extra mile to get there... people bitch and complain about it, but really, it's 2 dollars...
To drive down the hiway it is really not worth buying the extra octane. I still am able to run 80 to 130 mph but I'm not out to win the Gatornationals. Two trips to Philly and I need a tank of gas. It's like drinking beer.....if I'm going to drink alot of beer and **** it away I drink Labatt's (A middle of the road beer for $3)......if I'm going to drink a few beers and enjoy I drink Guiness (a premium beer for $4-5).
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 08:56 PM
  #31  
RaineMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-02-05
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake, UT
I always run premium... I'm gonna fill up with the 100 octane one of these days... too bad it's so expensive...
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 10:01 AM
  #32  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by Acidangel_5.0
go read it again

Yeah... I read it again... it says 89...

Maybe the Canadian manual is different than the US version?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 10:13 AM
  #33  
IMADreamer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-06
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by Omega_5
Yeah... I read it again... it says 89...

Maybe the Canadian manual is different than the US version?
must be because that's not what it says here.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 10:41 AM
  #34  
bluntgasm's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-22-06
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA


this should help; sorry its so big, im not sure how to resize it
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 10:45 AM
  #35  
Kaisoboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-20-06
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB Canada
94 Oct. for the Black Balt. I go out off my way to fill it with 94.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 11:01 AM
  #36  
an0malous's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-06
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 2
From: Canada
why would you want to risk damage to your engine for the sake of a buck or 2?

if your so desparate to save 1 or 2 dollars a week on gas....why the **** did you fork out the probably 50-100 more your paying on your payment every month to get the 2.4 or 2.0L engine?

what the **** kind of backwards logic is that?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 11:14 AM
  #37  
campo165's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-15-05
Posts: 6,216
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
I run 93 octane usually, but when i make trips (like when I travel home from school on breaks, like I am tomorrow) I fill with mid-grade 89 since I do not need the added power, but I do not want to run 87 octane and screw with my timing too much. Takes a tank to get back to normal timing.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #38  
shadowfaxss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-14-06
Posts: 1,646
Likes: 1
From: PA
Originally Posted by an0malous
why would you want to risk damage to your engine for the sake of a buck or 2?

if your so desparate to save 1 or 2 dollars a week on gas....why the **** did you fork out the probably 50-100 more your paying on your payment every month to get the 2.4 or 2.0L engine?

what the **** kind of backwards logic is that?
Because with 89 Octane it doesn't knock..................but I have to say after reading the post and figuring out how much I spend and the potential savings each year I've decided to run 91 or better. Thanks.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 11:57 AM
  #39  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Well, I run 87... if you guys don't like it, too bad...
It's funny how everyone jumps and says that it hurts your engine....
It's also funny how the Tech2 says that I've never had a knock sensor go off either....
Hmmm... and I drive it in -30C weather too.... I'm really killing it...

Besides... I don't think I own a fast car,so I don't drive it like a race car.... It's my winter car... plain and simple!

I won't bother arguing with anyone, I work at a fuels research center (see below link), and should probably know what is going to hurt my car.... but hey... everyone is an expert on here!

Link to my work -> http://www.src.sk.ca/html/research_t..._sys/index.cfm
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #40  
bluntgasm's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-22-06
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
nobody is attacking you. im just pointing out what the owners manual says. i could care less what fuel you use.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 12:58 PM
  #41  
budman128's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-04-06
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Watrous, Sask.
gm wouldn't tell you you could run 87 if it was bad. However once you go stage 2 premium is required. but run whatever you want its your car
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 01:23 PM
  #42  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by budman128
gm wouldn't tell you you could run 87 if it was bad. However once you go stage 2 premium is required. but run whatever you want its your car
Exactly what I'm trying to say... thank you!
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 02:33 PM
  #43  
budman128's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-04-06
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Watrous, Sask.
No prob
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 07:23 PM
  #44  
an0malous's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-06
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 2
From: Canada
Originally Posted by budman128
gm wouldn't tell you you could run 87 if it was bad. However once you go stage 2 premium is required. but run whatever you want its your car
"you may hear an audible knocking noise, often reffered to as spark knock"

I dont know about you, but that doesnt sound good to me.
And it sure as hell doesnt sound like something worth saving $2 a week for.


Like i said. Why would you spend possibly hundreds of dollars more a month to get a 2.4 or 2.0L supercharged vehicle....and then try to save $8 a month on gas and reduce your HP, and risk damage to your engine.

doesnt make any sense.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 11:11 PM
  #45  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by an0malous
"you may hear an audible knocking noise, often reffered to as spark knock"

I dont know about you, but that doesnt sound good to me.
And it sure as hell doesnt sound like something worth saving $2 a week for.
I'm not sure if you caught this one or not...

Originally Posted by Omega_5
It's funny how everyone jumps and says that it hurts your engine....
It's also funny how the Tech2 says that I've never had a knock sensor go off either....
Hmmm... and I drive it in -30C weather too.... I'm really killing it...
In other words... I've been scanning my car regularly (and why not... I have access to a Tech2, and it's a short walk to my car), and have not seen any signs of my car knocking at all!
Therefore, 87 octane doesn't hurt a stock Cobalt SS-SC... cause if it was going to knock, it would have in the -30C, dead cold winter...

But I'm done with the subject from here... It's pointless trying to argue the point.... everyone seems to be an expert about it, and I obviously know nothing!
Again my work link is -> http://www.src.sk.ca/html/research_t..._sys/index.cfm
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 12:21 AM
  #46  
an0malous's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-06
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 2
From: Canada
You do realise that the quote I wrote there was directly from GM right?

How the hell would I know personally. I dont run low octane fuel in my car.
Im just pointing out the fact that GM says 87 octane will cause spark knock....


but all of it is moot. until someone answers for me why they can justify the cost of an ss or ss/sc every month over the far cheaper, more fuel economic, and *happily runs on 87 octane" 2.2L cobalt*

but take the risk to save $2 every fillup.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 12:27 AM
  #47  
bluntgasm's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-22-06
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Originally Posted by an0malous
You do realise that the quote I wrote there was directly from GM right?

How the hell would I know personally. I dont run low octane fuel in my car.
Im just pointing out the fact that GM says 87 octane will cause spark knock....


but all of it is moot. until someone answers for me why they can justify the cost of an ss or ss/sc every month over the far cheaper, more fuel economic, and *happily runs on 87 octane" 2.2L cobalt*

but take the risk to save $2 every fillup.
i'll cosign this.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 12:30 AM
  #48  
1gmfanatik's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-26-06
Posts: 9,753
Likes: 0
From: Marlton, NJ
93 all day everyday for sure..When even the dealership recommends running premium, I would say that would be the way to go..I'm used to runnin high octane fuel in all my rides anyways
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 12:37 AM
  #49  
budman128's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-04-06
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Watrous, Sask.
Who cares really I run 91 and have since day one thats the best fuel we got here. we can argue this point to death and it would prove nothing. As for affording it I bought the car cause I liked it its not my main mode of transportation I have other vehicles and I don't even drive it in the winter. I do agree with you that premium is better for it but if he is running reg with no problem good for him
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 02:38 AM
  #50  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by an0malous
You do realise that the quote I wrote there was directly from GM right?

How the hell would I know personally. I dont run low octane fuel in my car.
Im just pointing out the fact that GM says 87 octane will cause spark knock....


but all of it is moot. until someone answers for me why they can justify the cost of an ss or ss/sc every month over the far cheaper, more fuel economic, and *happily runs on 87 octane" 2.2L cobalt*

but take the risk to save $2 every fillup.

Dude... we drive Cobalts.... not super cars....
Cobalt = economy car
I hate to break this to everyone... but a Cobalt (SC or not) is not a high class sports car... deal with it!

And just to justify 87 octane for you.... my SC is my daily driver.... the grocery getter....
If I want speed, I have an R1...
If I want class, I'll drive my '72...
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 PM.