2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Question about the 2.0 Engine ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 12:16 AM
  #1  
rallyracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-09-04
Posts: 9,440
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Question about the 2.0 Engine ???

I've been wondering this for a while; If the supercharger wasn’t on the 2.0 engine. How much HP and TQ would the 2.0 engine have? Does anyone know???
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 12:22 AM
  #2  
Cody_Richardson89's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-02-06
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Bluford, Illinois
Im not for sure about the chevy 2.0 but the civic Si 2.0 has something like 194hp and 182tq
I think i read that somewhere
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 12:22 AM
  #3  
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
From: AZ
I think it was around 150 or so. I can't remember where I saw that though.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 12:30 AM
  #4  
EndZz's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-29-05
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal 605X10fwy
yeah like 130-140whp or so kind of like a fast civic lol
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 12:37 AM
  #5  
9JordonFlex9's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-08-06
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: PA
Yea...few things

Im guessing 140whp
Reg civic is 140 crank hp, and 128 crank wtq....
Cobalt 2999(around there) lbs
These are prob a few lbs off..
Civic DX is 2650
Civic LX is 2724
Civic EX is 2850
Civic Si is 2870

Even though the reg Civics are lighter...still a 1.8L ivtec(good on gas but not power) only a SOHC....

The si is the...K20Z...its the Kseries engine...same as the RSX type s... Good hp! but horrible tq...its like 180whp and like 128wtq...they have one pushing 350hp and like 280tq, nice looking also
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 12:41 AM
  #6  
JoeyCobalt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-12-05
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: GTA, Ontario, Canada
Check the compression ratio's, the SS/SC is I think 9.5:1, that lower compression would put us farther down then that I think.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 12:42 AM
  #7  
avro206's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-17-04
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
Originally Posted by Cody_Richardson89
Im not for sure about the chevy 2.0 but the civic Si 2.0 has something like 194hp and 182tq
I think i read that somewhere

A Chevy 2.0 Ecotec and a Honda 2.0 are completely different engines. And since the 2.0 Ecotec is S/C it is totally useless to compare them soley on diespalcement. I am not sure why you'd bring up the Civic here.

And 182lb-ft? Try 139.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 12:51 AM
  #8  
9JordonFlex9's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-08-06
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: PA
to put it simple...the Si are owned by the SS SC...and there is a video of a SS 2.4L taking a Si....Sis are overpriced a bit...for their "performance". I have an accord right now( FOR SALE!!!!) i love vtec...but i dunno...using the k series...bah...no tq to em...if it was like 170wtq it would rip. doesnt matter how light ur car is...u need tq to go fast quicker :P
Plus the interior of em kinda...weird...sweet ass seats n shiter though!!!
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 01:09 AM
  #9  
victory_red_SS's Avatar
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
poolboy kill one of these threads, no need for 2
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 01:12 AM
  #10  
boosted2.2's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-12-06
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: South of Pittsburgh, Pa
not a chance at 140. Less compression and less displacement than the 2.2. I think it'd be alittle lower than 140.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 01:14 AM
  #11  
97CIVIC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-11-06
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: NEW JERSEY
I Would Like And Si And An Ss/sc To Race On Some Kind Of Tv Show So That Everyone Could See And Know That The Cobalt Ss/sc Owns The Si,
"civic Si Your Going Down"
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 09:29 AM
  #12  
JoeyCobalt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-12-05
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: GTA, Ontario, Canada
If it was on TV Honda would "sponsor" it and surprize! surprize! the Si would win, just like in all the magazines.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 09:45 AM
  #13  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
there was an article from when the redlines were released that said the engine was a 140hp 2.0L with an extra 65hp provided by an eaton roots style blower

it didn't say anything about the torque but at 140hp/6500rpm it would be a whopping 113tq
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 09:51 AM
  #14  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by JoeyCobalt
If it was on TV Honda would "sponsor" it and surprize! surprize! the Si would win, just like in all the magazines.
so true... it's like this:

we're comparing 17 sport compacts to find the fastest one, after comparing and seeing that even though honda is the next to slowest (slowest was a hyundai accent) we have decided to give it 1st prize. It's not important that this test was about speed, or that the honda was no where near the top. the important thing is that i am getting a free car for declaring honda the winner
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 10:54 AM
  #15  
9JordonFlex9's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-08-06
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: PA
its fact...the SS SC gets 0-60 in what? 5.9 seconds...and the Si gets 0-60 in bout 7.5 or a lil more....bout the same weight...I dont know the compression or gear ratios or that stuff off the top of my head...but com on...its dyno fact

SS SC

WHP: 214
WTQ: 195

VS

Si

WHP:175(about)
WTQ:130(about)

Come on...about 40 more wheel horse and over 50 wheel torque...they can't bull **** their way through the hard numbers
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 11:12 AM
  #16  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by 9JordonFlex9
Come on...about 40 more wheel horse and over 50 wheel torque...they can't bull **** their way through the hard numbers

appearently you never read car & driver's "cheap speed" article, comparing the cobalt ss, srt-4 and rsx-s ( i think the wrx was in it too, but can't recall)

the rsx was the most expensive and the slowest, but they still gave it the win.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 01:41 PM
  #17  
rallyracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-09-04
Posts: 9,440
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
So back the the question.....what HP and TQ the engine have with out the supercharger???
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 01:47 PM
  #18  
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
there was an article from when the redlines were released that said the engine was a 140hp 2.0L with an extra 65hp provided by an eaton roots style blower

it didn't say anything about the torque but at 140hp/6500rpm it would be a whopping 113tq
I think that is what it said on the first episode of Street Tuner Challenge. I just can't find the video to verify.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 11:09 PM
  #19  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by poolboyz02
So back the the question.....what HP and TQ the engine have with out the supercharger???

if you'll read up a couple of posts, you'll see i posted the #'s
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 11:10 PM
  #20  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by Cobalt_Supercharged
I think that is what it said on the first episode of Street Tuner Challenge. I just can't find the video to verify.

i think i seen it on a brochure or press release from gmpp
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 11:41 PM
  #21  
mi6_'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-01-05
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: Canada
It has 140 HP with no supercharger.

Screen cap from GM Powertrain PDF:

Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 11:53 PM
  #22  
9JordonFlex9's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-08-06
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: PA
damn nice find....damn nice
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 07:28 AM
  #23  
Jmc007's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Quebec City, Quebec
Originally Posted by poolboyz02
So back the the question.....what HP and TQ the engine have with out the supercharger???
Unplug the by-pass valve hoses and you will see ahaha ...
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 08:33 AM
  #24  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by mi6_
It has 140 HP with no supercharger.

Screen cap from GM Powertrain PDF:

thanks mi6... i thought it was in a redline brochure
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 11:42 PM
  #25  
Cody_Richardson89's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-02-06
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Bluford, Illinois
Originally Posted by avro206
A Chevy 2.0 Ecotec and a Honda 2.0 are completely different engines. And since the 2.0 Ecotec is S/C it is totally useless to compare them soley on diespalcement. I am not sure why you'd bring up the Civic here.

And 182lb-ft? Try 139.

ya i knew i put the torque to high, i had the data on a table i found on the internet and was looking at the wrong line. ya i know they are different engines, and i would sure as hell hope a domestic would kill a rice burner lol a base model could prolly take a civic
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
brandon04
Problems/Service/Maintenance
46
Oct 21, 2015 07:04 AM
HEATON
Parts
12
Oct 16, 2015 07:21 PM
SSLOW06
Complete Cars
1
Oct 1, 2015 07:21 PM
patooyee
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:07 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:51 AM.